‘Breaking through head-on’ by stipulating “reporting that is not true”
A counterattack against the criticism of ‘destroying national dignity’
It seems that President Yoon Seok-yeol has switched to offensive mode in response to the controversy over ‘slang words’ during his visit to New York last week.
There is also an evaluation that President Yoon, who seemed to refrain from making direct comments, chose to break through the various criticisms raised by the opposition over the fact that he put off his expression of regret for the time being and made a ‘remark’.
President Yoon met with reporters at the President’s Office in Yongsan on the morning of the 26th, his first commute to work after a five-night, seven-day tour to Britain, the United States and Canada.
On the 21st (local time) after meeting with US President Joe Biden in New York on the 21st (local time), there was a scene that seemed to say, “If the National Assembly does not approve these xxs, what will happen to OOO?” He made it clear that he wasn’t ‘Biden’ as reported in the press.
This is a direct reconfirmation of Kim Eun-hye’s explanation during the tour that he said ‘if (budget) is blown’, not ‘Biden’, and that the target of the remark also refers to our National Assembly (opposition), not the US Congress.
He even defined linking the remarks with Congress or President Biden as “undermining the alliance and putting the people at risk,” and further emphasized the need to find out the truth.
It is in line with the pouring argument that President Yoon’s remarks themselves have been reported distorted within the power of the people and that we need to take tough measures against MBC.
Immediately after President Yoon’s return to Korea, there was an air of active response to the controversy within his passport.
President Kim Dae-gi’s remarks on ‘fighting fake news’ at the high-ranking party council held on the day after the president’s return to Korea (25th) was read as a preview of this trend.
In the end, when the opposition continued to raise the offensive level, saying that it was a ‘diplomatic disaster’ and ‘damage of national dignity’, it is interpreted that President Yoon took a head-on response, even using the expression “damage of the alliance.”
Such a response seems to be underpinned by concerns that the diplomatic achievements of notifying the international community of the principles of freedom and solidarity through a speech at the UN General Assembly and self-proclaiming that important issues have been resolved through meetings with the leaders of the United States and Japan are being buried in the ‘controversy of profanity’. .
/yunhap news