Another blow to Heard in Johnny Depp’s defamation case

<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="

It was lawyers Heard They asked Judge Benny Azcaret to overturn the jury’s ruling ordering Heard to pay damages Ladeb The value of ten million dollars, in addition to declaring the trial null and void, but their request was rejected by the judge.

The reason for Heard’s request for a retrial was that a member of the jury was not the man summoned by the court but his son, in an error that occurred because the names of the two men were similar.

Azkaret confirmed that "There is no evidence of fraud or irregularity"and that the juror "He meets the legal requirements to provide this service"as quoted "AFP".

added: "He was investigated, sat in front of the entire jury, deliberated on the case and reached the verdict".

A jury concluded on June 1 that Depp and Heard were responsible for the defamation, but sided with the star of the movie series. "pirates of the caribbean" After an intense six-week trial, during which they accused each other of violent practices.

The trial, broadcast live in front of millions of people, provided bitter and intimate details of my star’s life Hollywood own.

The jury concluded that Heard had defamed Depp in an article she published in 2018, in which she spoke about "sexual violence" She was subjected to it, and the commission’s decision required the actress to pay ten million dollars in compensation to Deeb.

Deeb filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife over an article she published in a newspaper "Washington Post" She did not mention his name, but described herself as "public figure exposed for domestic violence".

“>

It was lawyers Heard They asked Judge Benny Azcaret to overturn the jury’s ruling ordering Heard to pay damages Ladeb The value of ten million dollars, in addition to declaring the trial null and void, but their request was rejected by the judge.

The reason for Heard’s request for a retrial was that a member of the jury was not the man summoned by the court but his son, in an error that occurred because the names of the two men were similar.

Azcaret confirmed that “there was no evidence of fraud or irregularity,” and that the sworn member “had fulfilled the legal requirements to provide this service,” according to “AFP.”

She added, “He was investigated, sat before the entire jury, deliberated on the case and reached a verdict.”

A jury on June 1 concluded that Depp and Heard were responsible for the defamation, but sided with the star of the movie series “pirates of the caribbeanAfter an intense six-week trial, during which they accused each other of practices of a violent nature.

The trial, broadcast live to millions of people, provided bitter and intimate details of my star’s life Hollywood own.

The jury concluded that Heard had defamed Depp in an article she had published in 2018, in which she talked about “sexual violence“I was exposed to him, and the commission’s decision required the actress to pay ten million dollars in compensation to Deeb.

Depp filed a lawsuit against his ex-wife over an article she published in the “Washington Post” newspaper, in which she did not mention his name, but described herself as a “public figure exposed to for domestic violence“.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.