MÉRIDA.- The subject accused of shoot at a driver in the peripheral of Mérida in days gone by was set free and the hearing before a judge for the accusation was postponed for next December 21, official sources reported.
Although the judicial process continues, the man was released because the Control Judge declared the arrest illegal.
as posted Yucatan Diaryon Monday, November 28, a subject shot in the peripheral of Merida against the driver of a Courier van, an employee of a pest control company.
How was the attack with a firearm in the peripheral of Mérida?
Apparently the attack was due to the fact that at a certain moment he argued with the driver of a gray Ford Lobo truck, with Yucatan license plates, who shot him after passing the bridge located at the height of the road to Xmatkuil.
To understand better: Aggression in the Peripheral of Mérida; Subject suffers from a gunshot wound
It was found that the attacker would be an agent of the Ministry of Public Security assigned to the custody of the governor Mauricio Vila Dosal. However, the state government denied that it is an operational element of the SSP or the custodian of any official.
Yesterday Thursday, at 6:58 p.m. the state government sent to the editorial staff of the Daily a bulletin stating the following:
After the events recorded at the beginning of the week in the peripheral of Mérida, CJCC was presented before the First Control Judge for the initial hearingwhich it was deferred to December 21so the process will continue.
The victims did not recognize the detainee as their aggressor
The State Attorney General’s Office initiated the investigation into the case from which criminal case 388/2022 derived, making available to the judicial authority the person who, given the evidence, there is a presumption of being the one who activated the weapon against their victims.
Last Monday, after the report that a subject activated a firearm from his vehicle injuring a person after a traffic disturbance and after the description of the alleged aggressor and the vehicle in which he was transported given by the victims, corroborated the data with search images of the C5i, giving way to the location operation until his arrest, finding a firearm in your vehicle.
At the hearing, after being presented before the judicial authority, the victims’ adviser mentioned to the Control Judge that they they did not recognize the detained person as their aggressor despite the fact that evidence was gathered before the Public Prosecutor’s Office that showed that he was the person whom the victims had described.
Why did the judge release the alleged perpetrator of the attack on the peripheral?
This resulted in the opinion of the Control Judge the detention was declared illegalwithout entering the context of the detention itself, for which reason ordered that the subject be released.,
He set a new hearing date in which the process against him will continue and the ministerial authority may state the evidence that supports its accusation and were not dismissed by the Judge.
In view of the judicial decision, The FGE immediately requested a hearing to imputegranting the Control Judge the aforementioned date of December 21 of this year.
The newspaper questions
In this case, Yucatan Diary yesterday sent the following questions to the Department of Public Securitythe State Attorney General and the direction of Social Communication of the state government:
- Did the state police arrest the person wrong?
- If the person presented is not the shooter, then who did? He fled?
- Is it the person but the affected received pressure to declare how he did it?
- Why does the judge declare the detention illegal if the information of those affected was crossed with images of the C5i?
- Have footprints of the detainee the firearm that was in the seized vehicle? whatmatch the gun with the characteristics of the bullets found in the victim’s vehicle?
- Do you have the stopped and presented (CJCC) links with the SSP? Are you the governor’s custodian?
- Who is he van owner arrested? Is it from the alleged attacker? Is it owned by the state government? whatstill detained the vehicle or was it also released?
- What tests of the Public Ministry showed that the detainee is the person described for the victims?
- What will happen at the hearing December 21?
- To what is dedicated C.J.C.C.?
- How many time passed between the moment of the shot and the interception of the alleged offender?
- How long was it?followed” the vehicle of the aggressor by the SSP C5i?
- What distance between the site of the attack and the place where he was arrested the alleged perpetrator?
- What was the “route” that the defendant followed from the shooting to his arrest?
Until the closing of the edition, none of the official instances had responded to the questions of this newspaper.