Scientists disputed in their legitimacy by Mrs. and Mr. “Everyone” … Stop delirium, implores the physicist Etienne Klein.
In his latest book The long-term emergency (The Observatory), the physicist and doctor of philosophy of science Etienne Klein puts words on a phenomenon of which professors Raoult and others are more or less voluntary vehicles: scientific populism. At a time when the excitement of personal opinion and the exhaustion of the elites guaranteed comfortable electoral scores, it would have been surprising if this systematic liquidation of expertise did not also affect science. Only here: having an opinion does not mean having the truth, recalls Etienne Klein. Extract.
“At the beginning of the pandemic, about such or such treatment whose possible effectiveness was not yet formally established […], we were able to read short statements from Internet users, including certain political leaders, starting with: ‘I am not a doctor, but I think that …’ So we have had large-scale confirmation that it is become possible to have enough confidence in your only feeling (boosted intravenously by an oversizing of the ego) to decide with a simple sentence – while honestly acknowledging that you know nothing about it! – questions which finally appeared to be dizzyingly complex. […].
Article reserved for subscribers
To continue reading, subscribe and take advantage of our offer
1 € the 1st month
I subscribe now
Included in the Digital and Audio subscription
- Audio magazine and augmented digital magazine
- L’Express Masterclass
- Unlimited access to articles without ads
- Access to all newsletters
Already subscribed? To log in