Is US Chicken Chlorinated & Safe?

“Chlorinated Chicken” Controversy: Unpacking the U.S.-europe Food Safety Divide

WASHINGTON — A recent remark by President Trump about Europe’s reluctance to import American chicken has reignited a longstanding and contentious trade dispute. At the heart of the matter lies the perception,particularly in Europe,of U.S. poultry as “chlorinated chicken,” a term that evokes concerns about food safety and processing standards.

The phrase “chlorinated chicken” refers to the practise of using chlorine-based rinses in poultry processing plants to reduce harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Campylobacter on chicken carcasses after slaughter. While this practice was once common in the United States,the European Union banned it in 1997,along with other “pathogen reduction treatments.”

The debate over chlorinated chicken has become a symbol of broader differences in food safety philosophies between the U.S. and Europe.Fears of chlorinated chicken entering the U.K. animated debates during Brexit. Over the weekend, the U.K. business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said his country will “never change” its food standards, when asked during a Sky News interview if “chlorinated chicken was on the table or off the table” during trade talks.

While the term “chlorinated chicken” persists, its accuracy has diminished, according to experts.

“The vast majority of chicken processed in the United States is not chilled in chlorine and hasn’t been for quite a few years,” said Dianna Bourassa, an applied poultry microbiologist at Auburn University. “So that’s not the issue.”

According to the National Chicken Council, an industry group that surveyed its members, less then 5% of poultry processing facilities still use chlorine in rinses and sprays.Those that do utilize a highly diluted solution at concentrations deemed safe.

Instead, the

, nsito a driver’s ed class.

“Chlorinated Chicken” Controversy: An Interview with Dr. Anya Sharma on Food Safety Standards

WASHINGTON — The “chlorinated chicken” debate continues too simmer, highlighting important differences in food safety standards between the United States and Europe. To shed light on this complex issue, we spoke with Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading food safety expert and Director of the Institute for Food Standards at the University of California, Davis.

Understanding the “Chlorinated Chicken” Issue

Archyde: Dr. Sharma,thank you for joining us. Let’s start with the basics. What exactly is “chlorinated chicken,” and why has it become such a flashpoint in trade discussions?

Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. The term “chlorinated chicken” refers to poultry that has been treated with chlorine-based rinses during processing. This is done to reduce the presence of harmful bacteria like Salmonella and Campylobacter. However, the use of these treatments has raised concerns, especially in Europe, about the safety of U.S. food processing methods. The U.S. and Europe have fundamentally different approaches to food safety,causing trade tensions.

Diverging Food Safety Philosophies

Archyde: The EU banned chlorine washes in 1997. Can you elaborate on the differing philosophies between the U.S. and Europe regarding food safety when it comes to poultry processing?

Dr. Sharma: Certainly.The U.S. food safety approach, in many ways, relies more heavily on pathogen reduction at the end of the processing line. Chlorine washes are one example. The EU, on the other hand, emphasizes a preventative approach, focusing on hygiene and control from farm to fork, to minimize contamination throughout the entire production chain. This is a crucial difference.

The Current Reality of U.S. Poultry Production

Archyde: The article mentions that the term “chlorinated chicken” might not be entirely accurate anymore. Can you clarify the situation regarding chlorine use in U.S. poultry processing today?

Dr. Sharma: That’s correct. Industry data suggests that the prevalence of chlorine use has decreased. The vast majority of chicken processed in the US does not use chlorine at all. Those plants still utilizing chlorine, use highly diluted solutions, often at concentrations deemed safe by the FDA and USDA.

Trade implications and Consumer Perception

Archyde: This has significant implications for international trade. From the current situation concerning the U.K. and the EU. How do you assess the impact on market access?

Dr. Sharma: Absolutely. The UK’s decision to maintain its food standards, highlights how seriously the consumers and regulators view this issue.The “chlorinated chicken” debate is a symbol of a broader consumer perception and how different processing standards are viewed. While the focus is on chlorine washes, the heart of the matter is consumer perception, and the question if consumers trust the food safety systems in other geographic locations. It makes trade more difficult, as businesses that follow the standards of one market may not be able to enter the other market.

Future Outlook and Outlook

Archyde: What’s next? Given the evolving dynamics and consumer concerns, what practical steps can be taken to bridge the gap, address consumer concerns, and promote better understanding?

Dr. Sharma: Transparency and education are key. Openly communicating the current processing methods, alongside continuous research and validation of food-safety measures, can assist in trust and address concerns. Harmonizing standards might be a long-term goal, but for the short term, increased cooperation on food safety risk assessment tools would be beneficial.

Archyde: Brilliant points.Now, what thought-provoking question or observation would you offer our readers to ignite a further discussion about this topic?

Dr. Sharma:Considering that both the U.S. and the EU have robust food safety systems, how can we better facilitate the exchange of scientific and best practices, and where is there space for consumer choice and preferences within trade agreements?

Archyde: Dr. sharma, thank you for your insightful perspective. It’s been a pleasure.

Dr. Sharma: The pleasure was all mine.