“It’s only damage if you rebuild it”… The sale of Leemun 3 and Bangbae 5 has been delayed until next year

◆ Raw materials and housing supply crisis ◆

picture explanationThe construction site of the Bangbae District 5 reconstruction complex located in the middle of Seocho-gu, Seoul. The sale of this complex, which includes 1,686 households for general sale, has been delayed until June next year as controversy arose over the sale price. [이충우 기자]

The reconstruction association in the area of ​​136 Munjeong-dong, considered one of the best reconstruction complexes in Songpa-gu, Seoul, completed a report on the start of construction in October last year, but it has had difficulties in calculating the sale price and continues to delay the sale of 286 households. Since the outbreak of the Ukrainian War, the cost of procurement of materials has been snowballing due to the increase in raw material prices. This is because existing members are opposed to delaying the sale schedule as they cannot arbitrarily raise the sale price. According to the association, the sale price is expected to be notified from the Songpa-gu Office at the end of June or early July of this year. The expected sale price is 34 million won per 3.3 square meters, but the union explained that it must be at least 38 million won to get the consent of the union members. Otherwise, the sale schedule is likely to be delayed again.

A union official said, “The contribution per member is only 430 million won, and each person has to pay an additional 80 million won through the reconstruction excess profit recovery system.” It is a situation where the burden on the members may be greater than that,” he said. In the case of reconstruction, it is a structure in which members and contractors secure business feasibility through profits obtained from general sales. This is the reason for the reaction from the members’ point of view, “It is better not to do it at a loss.”

In fact, there are cases in which the sale price of union members must be higher than the general sale price in order to proceed with the business. In the case of the 1st reconstruction of Daechiwooseong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, a briefing session was held for members based on its own pre-sale price estimate earlier this year, and when the plan with the member’s sale price set higher than the general sale price was revealed, a great controversy arose among union members.

An official from the housing division of a large construction company said, “I know that there are not a few cases where the sale price of union members is higher than the general sale price in the Seoul area.” Because of this situation, there are even arguments for using tricks. Another member of the reconstruction complex in Songpa-gu said, “I’m getting worried because the executive department doesn’t tell me the sale price even at the request of the union members.”

The price of construction raw materials soaring due to global inflation and the war in Russia and Ukraine is also acting as a double high. The Bangbae District 5 reconstruction project, which contains 1,686 households for general sale, is also experiencing difficulties in calculating the sale price due to the rise in construction costs. A union official said, “Before the construction price rose, the general sale price was estimated to be around 50 million won per 3.3㎡. Subcontractors have also announced plans to suspend construction work. The Association of Window and Curtain Wall Manufacturers announced that they would suspend construction indefinitely from the 2nd of next month if the increase in raw material prices is not reflected.

According to the subscription home under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on the 23rd, the number of newly sold apartments in Seoul this year was only 1,727. Seoul, which lacks new land, has no choice but to rely on reconstruction and redevelopment for most of its supply, as setbacks are occurring everywhere. The biggest obstacle is the price ceiling system. Construction costs are rising due to the rise in the price of construction materials, but the ceiling is blocked by the ‘ceiling’, making it difficult to secure business feasibility.

In fact, most of the maintenance project associations in the metropolitan area, including Seoul, are in a position to wait for the new government’s policy to ease the price ceiling system and then start a full-scale sale schedule. An official from the Bangbae District 5 association said, “The situation is that we have no choice but to closely monitor the easing of the sale price ceiling system by the Yoon Seok-yeol government.” The redevelopment association of Imun 3 District, Dongdaemun-gu also aimed to sell the units at the end of last year, but the schedule has been delayed. An official from the association said, “Only sale to members of the union will be held in October, and general sale will wait until the ceiling on sale price is eased.”

Construction companies are rather reluctant to win orders as business feasibility deteriorates due to the rise in construction costs. The residents’ representative meeting for the redevelopment project in Shinheung 1 district, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, held an on-site briefing session on the 4th to select a contractor, but it failed. Not a single construction company participated in the briefing. Although it is a large-scale project with more than 4,000 households, it was carried out as a public redevelopment, so the construction cost was set at 4.95 million won per 3.3 square meters. It seems that the current raw material price situation makes it difficult to afford. The 3rd district of Udong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, with 2918 households, was also auctioned off because there were no construction companies participating in it, although the association recently made two bids for construction companies.

Construction companies that have already won orders are delaying the start of construction. Reconstruction orders increased sharply in March in anticipation of the new government’s deregulation, but the actual construction has not started. Park Cheol-hwan, a researcher at the Construction Industry Research Institute, said, “Construction usually starts within six months of a contract, but these days, material prices are so high that construction companies do not start construction.” It’s not,” he said.

Experts point out that it is desirable to abolish or drastically reduce the price ceiling system, saying that it loses the function of price suppression and produces only the side effect of blocking supply. Park Hap-soo, an adjunct professor at Konkuk University’s Graduate School of Real Estate, said, “At the beginning, the goal of the sale price ceiling was to reduce the surrounding market price to the same as the sale price to promote price stability, but now it only produces lottery sales that leave only market profit.” “It has lost its function.” did.

[이석희 기자 / 연규욱 기자]
[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.