Li Zhanshu’s report to the National People’s Congress provokes scholars: highlights the CCP’s perverse practices | Hong Kong | Democracy | Sino-British Joint Statement

[The Epoch Times, March 10, 2022](The Epoch Times reporters Zhao Fenghua and Luo Ya interviewed and reported) Li Zhanshu, chairman of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, said in this year’s work report that last year’s work reportHongkongThe new electoral system hasPatriots rule Hong Kong“Successfully implemented, the comprehensive governance of Hong Kong and international legal struggles will be strengthened in the future. Li’s report has caused controversy internationally. Some scholars believe that using the much-maligned Hong Kong’s new electoral system as a political achievement propaganda highlights the CCP’s totalitarian system and universalism. World values ​​are fundamentally opposed.

scholar:”Patriots rule Hong Kong“It’s actually “pro-Communist people govern Hong Kong”

In March 2021, the National People’s Congress passed the “National People’s Congress Improvement”HongkongDecision on the Election System”, tightening elections at all levels in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to cooperate with the CCP’s implementation of the “patriots ruling Hong Kong” governance model for Hong Kong. Western countries generally expressed strong opposition to this. The United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many other countries, as well as the European Union, issued a statement sternly condemning the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China for subverting and directly interfering in Hong Kong’s electoral system and destroying the “Hong Kong electoral system”.One country, two systems“anddemocracydevelopment, in complete violation of theSino-British Joint Statement》。

Chen Hua, a lawyer from Beijing and a doctor of law, said in an interview with The Epoch Times recently that “patriots ruling Hong Kong” actually forced Hong Kong civil servants to obey the CCP.

Dr. Chen Hua said: “The so-called patriotic rule of Hong Kong itself is closely related to the concept of patriotism.Sino-British Joint Statementthe Basic Law of Hong Kong, the high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong promised by the CCP,One country, two systems, is completely contradictory, and this is a specious and extremely deceptive statement, an extremely evil statement that can represent the CCP, an evil autocratic rule. “

“On the other hand, it is a concept of stealing. It is in the name of patriotism to force and force Hong Kong civil servants to love the CCP. In the final analysis, it is an attempt to make all Hong Kong civil servants obey the CCP.”

In an interview with The Epoch Times recently, Dr. Lin Song, an immigrant from Hong Kong and a senior media person, said that the so-called “patriots ruling Hong Kong” is actually “pro-CCP people ruling Hong Kong.”

Dr. Lin Song said: “The CCP believes that all people in Hong Kong who do not like the CCP and criticize the CCP are all unpatriotic. In fact, the CCP is unpatriotic. The CCP is an autocratic ruler, so the CCP now wants to rule the country. People in Hong Kong, the so-called Hong Kong people, are all fake. In fact, they may all be undercover party members of the CCP. The so-called patriots ruling Hong Kong are actually pro-CCP people ruling Hong Kong and pro-Beijing people ruling Hong Kong. right.”

Scholar: Subversion of “one country, two systems” highlights the CCP’s chaos in Hong Kong

Dr. Chen Hua told The Epoch Times that the CCP under the banner of “patriots ruling Hong Kong” undermined Hong Kong’sdemocracysubverting “one country, two systems”.

Chen Hua said: “The real right to examine whether candidates are eligible to be elected lies with the voters, and this is true democracy. The CCP uses the lofty banner of ‘patriots ruling Hong Kong’, in fact, to restrict and deprive them of The electoral rights of Hong Kong voters are meant to subvert and overturn one country, two systems in essence.”

Dr. Chen Hua believes that the CCP’s willingness to use the National People’s Congress to amend the electoral law to undermine Hong Kong’s democracy stems from the CCP’s fear of the democracy, the rule of law and the constitutional system that Hong Kong already has.

Dr. Chen Hua said: “Because these two regimes, the rule of law, constitutionalism, human rights, and democracy in Hong Kong, are in stark contrast with the authoritarian regime in the mainland. Anyone who has contact with Hong Kong Yes, anyone who has a perceptual understanding of Hong Kong and who has been to Hong Kong will know when they come back, which of the two systems is better and which is the real democracy, and will have a negative perception of the CCP system from the bottom of their hearts. Hong Kong has already formed a good rule of law and a good system such as constitutional government, which has been messed up, and then a totalitarian system that is autocratic and mainlandized is imposed on Hong Kong.”

Veteran media personality Dr. Lin Song said Hong Kong’s new electoral system also undermined the rule of law in Hong Kong.

Dr. Lin Song said: “It turns out that the Basic Law of the Sino-British Joint Declaration stipulates that the chief executive of Hong Kong must be elected by universal suffrage. Later, the CCP revised the Basic Law and then came up with a new thing. The current set of this fundamentally violates the original Hong Kong’s legal system is a mess, and if you make a set of things, it is new, but in fact, it is the rule of man, not the rule of law.”

Scholar: The CCP is the biggest obstacle to the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation

On March 8, Li Zhanshu declared in his report that in terms of foreign affairs, the National People’s Congress formulated the “Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law” to address “issues related to Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, Taiwan, sea, epidemic and human rights. “Clarify China’s position and fight to the end all forces that attempt to subvert the leadership of the CCP and China’s socialist system and block the process of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

Regarding Li Zhanshu’s murderous struggle remarks, Dr. Chen Hua told The Epoch Times that the CCP cannot represent the Chinese nation, and the CCP’s autocratic regime is the biggest obstacle to the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.

Chen Hua said: “What does the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation depend on? It does not depend on the totalitarian and tyrannical evil system of the Communist Party, but on constitutional democracy and the legal system, the protection of human rights, and the conscious participation of all citizens. Only by implementing true and thorough democracy can the Chinese nation be realized. great revival.”

He said that the most unfavorable factor for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is the CCP. “From the Great Leap Forward and the anti-rightist movement in 1957 and 1958, to the three years of man-made disasters, to the death of tens of millions of people, to the turmoil of the Cultural Revolution in 10 years, From the suppression of 18964, to the brutal suppression of citizens, rights defenders, lawyers, benign intellectuals, Falun Gong, etc. in the past ten years. What really hinders the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is the CCP itself. The CCP is the biggest obstacle to China’s renaissance.”

Regarding Li Zhanshu’s struggle remarks, senior media person Dr. Lin Song said that Li’s remarks completely reversed right and wrong, and completely reversed black and white. He said that the Republic of China is the national rejuvenation, and the CCP is the main culprit for dividing China.

Dr. Lin Song said: “The Chinese nation has changed from the fall of the Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China. The Republic of China is already a national rejuvenation, and now the CCP is talking about dividing China. In fact, the most typical and most powerful division of China is the Chinese Communist Party. Subverting China, making China very unstable, and creating so-called Hong Kong independence, Taiwan independence, Tibet independence, Xinjiang independence, it turns out that China does not have these things, but the CCP created it.”

Responsible editor: Gao Jing#

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.