pornhub | Serena Fleites | The sexual video of a minor under 13 published on Pornhub for which Visa will be prosecuted in the United States | MindGeek | WORLD

A victim of sexual abuse will sue Visa for videos of her published on the porn platform Pornhubafter a court in the United States ruled that it can go against the payment company.

Serena Fleites She was 13 in 2014 when, she alleges, a boyfriend pressured her to do an explicit video that he later posted on Pornhub.

MIRA: The man who wants to dig up a city dump to find a hard drive containing a fortune in bitcoins

Flutes claims that Visaprocessing ad revenue, conspired with Pornhub’s parent company, MindGeekto earn money from the videos of their abuse.

Visa had sought to be removed from the case.

Fleites’ story was featured in the “Children of Pornhub” article on the New York Timeswhich upon publication prompted MindGeek to remove millions of videos and make significant changes to its policies and practices.

The victim’s allegations are summarized in a pre-trial ruling from the Central District Court of California.

million views

The initial explicit video, posted on Pornhub without the victim’s knowledge or consent, had 400,000 views when discovered by the victim.

She alleges that after learning of the video, she contacted MindGeek posing as her mother “to inform her that the video qualified as child pornography.” A few weeks later she was eliminated.

But users who had downloaded the video re-uploaded it several times, and one of the reposts was viewed 2.7 million times, he argues.

A man tries to abuse a teenage girl by touching her without consent. (GETTY IMAGES).

The complainant alleges that MindGeek earned advertising revenue from these reposts.

Fleites says her life “spun out of control” (she had several failed suicide attempts and her family relationships deteriorated) and then, while living at a friend’s house, an older man introduced her to heroin.

To finance his addiction, while still a minor, he created more explicit videos at the behest of this man, some of which were uploaded to Pornhub.

“While MindGeek profited from the child pornography it presented to Plaintiff, Plaintiff was intermittently homeless or living in her car, addicted to heroin, depressed, suicidal, and without the support of her family,” the report reads. summary of Judge Cormac J. Carney’s brief.

GETTY IMAGES.
GETTY IMAGES.

MindGeek told the BBC that at this point in the case, the court has yet to rule on the veracity of the allegations and must conclude that all of the plaintiff’s allegations are true and accurate.

“When the court can actually consider the facts, we are confident that the plaintiff’s claims will be dismissed for lack of merit,” the company said.

“Tool to commit the crime”

The judge ruled that, at the current stage of the proceedings, “the court can infer the strong possibility that the Visa network was involved in at least some advertising transactions directly related to the plaintiff’s videos.”

But the payments company argued that “the allegation that Visa recognized MindGeek as an authorized merchant and processed payment to its websites does not suggest that Visa agreed to engage in any form of sex trafficking.”

He also argued, according to the judge’s account, that a business relationship alone does not establish a conspiracy.

But Judge Carney said that, again at this stage in the proceedings, “the court can comfortably infer that Visa intended to help MindGeek monetize child pornography from the fact that Visa continued to provide MindGeek with the means to do so and knew that MindGeek was doing it.”

Pornhub logo on a phone and US dollar bills behind it.  (GETTY IMAGES).
Pornhub logo on a phone and US dollar bills behind it. (GETTY IMAGES).

“Put another way, Visa is not alleged to have merely created an incentive to commit a crime, it is alleged to have knowingly provided the tool used to commit a crime,” he explained.

A Visa spokesman told the BBC that the company condemns sex trafficking, sexual exploitation and child sexual abuse material.

“This pre-trial ruling is disappointing and mischaracterizes Visa’s role and its policies and practices. Visa will not tolerate the use of our network for illegal activity. We continue to believe that Visa is an inappropriate defendant in this case,” he added.

Zero tolerance

Last month, MindGeek’s CEO and COO resigned.

Top executive departures followed more negative press in a magazine article The New Yorker which examined, among other things, the company’s moderation policies.

MindGeek told the BBC that:

The company also said any suggestion that it is not serious about removing illegal material is “categorically false.”

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.