write a title which is good for an website to rank high in google searches about this content Chancellor Karl Nehammer is fighting against the end of new combustion cars. E-fuels should be the solution – an expert takes a stand.
The EU plans to no longer allow new cars with petrol and diesel combustion engines from 2035 – the end has already been decided by the EU countries and the car manufacturers also want to rely fully on electromobility. In Austria, however, Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) is fighting against the combustion engine – as he did on Wednesday with a “car summit”. There, Nehammer reiterated the compromise that combustion engines should continue to be approved with e-fuels. E-fuels are synthetic fuels made from hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2).
Their production is complex and energy-intensive. E-fuels are therefore – like e-cars – at most as green as the power plants that produced the electricity required for them. But what use is it if Austria wants to rely on e-fuels, but the manufacturers don’t want to produce such cars at all? Accordingly, the e-fuels expert Jürgen Rechberger from the company AVL List calculated with this plan late on Wednesday evening. “In principle, we generally support openness to technology,” says Rechenberger, nobody questions batteries and e-fuels are needed in some areas.
E-fuels only “where there are no alternatives”
Then came the but: Over the next 20 or 30 years, renewable electricity will become a “rare commodity,” says Rechenberger, which is why e-fuels have to be used “where there are no alternatives.” And that would be aviation and shipping and not the car, according to the expert.
Work and production machines would then follow behind planes and ships, and only then would it make sense to talk about cars. “But it won’t be possible across the board,” says Rechenberger. In addition, almost all car manufacturers have already declared that they want to rely entirely on electromobility, despite the e-fuel option.
Rechenberger is also “skeptical” as to whether it makes sense to bring a relevant proportion of e-fuel vehicles onto the market at all. The most efficient technology is “battery-electric”, so it makes sense to rely on this technology, according to the expert.
From his point of view, “the electric motor will prevail in the long term”, there will also be hydrogen drives, but e-fuels will tend to fill the gaps where there are still no electric and hydrogen drives. In general, a lot will be done on the e-car market by 2030, according to the expert, model prices from 20,000 euros would become suitable for the masses.
What is behind “E-Fuels”.
E-fuels are highly praised by their supporters as a climate-neutral alternative to battery-powered electric cars, but that is only partially true.
These are synthetic fuels made from hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2). However, their production is complex and energy-intensive. E-fuels are therefore – like e-cars – at most as green as the power plants that produced the electricity required for them.
Although e-fuels have certain advantages (can be filled up normally, lower weight than a battery, etc.), the crux of the matter is their horrendous energy balance compared to other types of drive due to the production process.
The ADAC (an e-fuel advocate) calculates that a 3-megawatt wind turbine could supply 1,600 e-cars. If you use the electricity for hydrogen conversion, only 600 vehicles could move out with it. In the end, there are only 250 vehicles with e-fuel combustion engines.
The future areas of application for e-fuels are therefore often seen more in aviation and shipping than in private transport.
rfi | Akt:
The EU plans to no longer allow new cars with petrol and diesel combustion engines from 2035 – the end has already been decided by the EU countries and the car manufacturers also want to rely fully on electromobility. In Austria, however, Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) is fighting against the combustion engine – as he did on Wednesday with a “car summit”. There, Nehammer reiterated the compromise that combustion engines should continue to be approved with e-fuels. E-fuels are synthetic fuels made from hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2).
Their production is complex and energy-intensive. E-fuels are therefore – like e-cars – at most as green as the power plants that produced the electricity required for them. But what use is it if Austria wants to rely on e-fuels, but the manufacturers don’t want to produce such cars at all? Accordingly, the e-fuels expert Jürgen Rechberger from the company AVL List calculated with this plan late on Wednesday evening. “In principle, we generally support openness to technology,” says Rechenberger, nobody questions batteries and e-fuels are needed in some areas.
E-fuels only “where there are no alternatives”
Then came the but: Over the next 20 or 30 years, renewable electricity will become a “rare commodity,” says Rechenberger, which is why e-fuels have to be used “where there are no alternatives.” And that would be aviation and shipping and not the car, according to the expert.
Work and production machines would then follow behind planes and ships, and only then would it make sense to talk about cars. “But it won’t be possible across the board,” says Rechenberger. In addition, almost all car manufacturers have already declared that they want to rely entirely on electromobility, despite the e-fuel option.
Rechenberger is also “skeptical” as to whether it makes sense to bring a relevant proportion of e-fuel vehicles onto the market at all. The most efficient technology is “battery-electric”, so it makes sense to rely on this technology, according to the expert.
From his point of view, “the electric motor will prevail in the long term”, there will also be hydrogen drives, but e-fuels will tend to fill the gaps where there are still no electric and hydrogen drives. In general, a lot will be done on the e-car market by 2030, according to the expert, model prices from 20,000 euros would become suitable for the masses.
What is behind “E-Fuels”.
E-fuels are highly praised by their supporters as a climate-neutral alternative to battery-powered electric cars, but that is only partially true.
These are synthetic fuels made from hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2). However, their production is complex and energy-intensive. E-fuels are therefore – like e-cars – at most as green as the power plants that produced the electricity required for them.
Although e-fuels have certain advantages (can be filled up normally, lower weight than a battery, etc.), the crux of the matter is their horrendous energy balance compared to other types of drive due to the production process.
The ADAC (an e-fuel advocate) calculates that a 3-megawatt wind turbine could supply 1,600 e-cars. If you use the electricity for hydrogen conversion, only 600 vehicles could move out with it. In the end, there are only 250 vehicles with e-fuel combustion engines.
The future areas of application for e-fuels are therefore often seen more in aviation and shipping than in private transport.
2023-04-19 20:25:24 Chancellor Karl Nehammer is fighting against the end of new combustion cars. E-fuels should be the solution – an expert takes a stand. The EU plans to no longer allow new cars with petrol and diesel combustion engines from 2035 – the end has already been decided by the EU countries and the … Read more
