Hong Kong Condemns UK and Australia for Granting Asylum to Opposition Activists
Hong Kong authorities have issued strong rebukes against Australia and the United Kingdom, accusing them of harbouring criminals after both nations granted asylum to prominent opposition activists.
Published: October 27, 2023
The Hong Kong government has vehemently criticized countries that offer refuge to individuals it identifies as fugitives wanted under its national security laws. This strong reaction follows separate announcements this past weekend by former lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung and activist Tony Chung Hon-lam, confirming they have received asylum in Australia and the United Kingdom, respectively.
Accusations of ‘Criminal Harbouring’ and Disregard for Law
In a statement released early Sunday morning, a spokesperson for the Hong kong government declared “strong disapproval and opposition against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country.” While not explicitly naming any nation or individual, the message was clear.
The government further articulated its stance, stating, “Any country that harbours Hong Kong criminals in any form shows contempt for the rule of law, grossly disrespects Hong Kong’s legal systems and barbarically interferes in the affairs of hong Kong.” The statement warned that nations turning a blind eye to alleged offences and potential security threats would “eventually bear the consequences of what they have done.”
The authorities characterized the actions of those absconding from national security charges as “out-and-out shameful and cowardly acts,” asserting that these individuals continue to engage in activities that endanger national security from abroad.
Key Figures Granted Asylum
Ted Hui Chi-fung,a former Legislative Council member,is reportedly residing in Adelaide,Australia. Tony chung Hon-lam, an activist, announced his asylum status from London. Both individuals had faced serious charges related to national security offences within Hong Kong.
Did You know?
the application of national security laws in Hong Kong has been a significant point of international concern and debate as its implementation in 2020.
| Activist | Granted Asylum In | Previously Based In |
|---|---|---|
| Ted Hui Chi-fung | australia | Hong Kong (Fugitive) |
| Tony Chung Hon-lam | United Kingdom | hong Kong (Based) |
International Law and Asylum: An Evergreen Outlook
The granting of asylum is a complex process governed by international law, including the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, to which both Australia and the UK are signatories. These treaties outline the conditions under which individuals fleeing persecution or serious harm can seek protection in another country. Countries have the sovereign right to assess asylum claims based on their national laws and international obligations.
Though, Hong Kong’s assertion of jurisdiction over its citizens abroad, particularly in relation to national security, creates friction with the asylum principles upheld by nations like Australia and the UK. This situation underscores a broader geopolitical tension concerning the interpretation and extraterritorial reach of national security legislation, as discussed by organizations like Human Rights Watch.
Pro Tip:
Understanding asylum laws requires looking at both international treaties and the specific domestic policies of the granting country.
The Broader Implications of National Security legislation
The events highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the impact of national security laws on civil liberties and political dissent. Countries that grant asylum frequently enough do so after determining that the individuals face a credible threat of persecution in their home country.This often involves assessing whether the charges are politically motivated or if fair trial guarantees are upheld.
The Hong kong government’s strong reaction signals its intent to assert its legal authority internationally,while the asylum grants by Western democracies reflect their commitment to human rights and the protection of individuals fleeing potential political persecution. This dynamic is highly likely to remain a significant factor in the bilateral relations between Hong Kong, China, and the countries offering refuge.
Frequently Asked Questions About Hong Kong Asylum Cases
Why did Hong Kong authorities react strongly to the asylum granted to activists?
Hong Kong authorities view the granting of asylum as ‘harbouring criminals’ and a sign of contempt for their legal system and the rule of law,as well as interference in their internal affairs.
Which opposition activists were granted asylum?
Fugitive former lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung, now in Adelaide, and activist Tony Chung Hon-lam, based in London, were granted asylum.
What was the Hong Kong government’s official stance on the asylum cases?
The Hong Kong government expressed strong disapproval and opposition,stating that any country harbouring their ‘criminals’ shows contempt for the rule of law and disrespects Hong Kong’s legal systems.
What are the implications of these asylum grants for international relations?
These actions highlight ongoing tensions regarding national security laws and the differing interpretations of legal and political freedoms between Hong Kong and countries offering asylum.
What are considered ‘national security offences’ in Hong Kong?
While specific details vary, offences typically relate to acts deemed to endanger national security, such as secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces under the national security legislation.