The Evolving Definition of NBA Dominance: Beyond MVP to Year-Long Impact
The Oklahoma City Thunder’s Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is having a season for the ages. A championship, Finals MVP, and a historic start to the following season have cemented his place at the top of many lists. But a fascinating debate is brewing in NBA circles: how do we truly define the “best” player? Is it solely based on regular season accolades like the Kia MVP award, or is there a growing recognition of a more holistic, year-round impact that extends from playoff runs into the next season’s opening tip?
The Rise of the “Finish-to-Start” Player
Traditionally, the NBA’s Most Valuable Player award has been the pinnacle of individual achievement. However, a new metric is gaining traction – a “Player of the Year” designation, informally recognized by basketball analysts, that assesses performance across the finish of one season and the start of the next. This approach acknowledges the momentum and carryover effect a player can have, particularly after a deep playoff run. It’s about identifying those who don’t just peak during the regular season, but sustain excellence through the crucible of the postseason and into the following year.
Shaun Powell’s recent analysis highlights a top 10, with SGA and Nikola Jokic unsurprisingly leading the charge. But the real intrigue lies in the players ranked 3 through 10 – Anthony Edwards, Jalen Brunson, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Donovan Mitchell, Cade Cunningham, Luka Dončić, Tyrese Haliburton, and Jayson Tatum. Each possesses a unique narrative, a blend of brilliance and circumstance that shapes their position in this evolving conversation.
Injury’s Impact on the Hierarchy
A recurring theme in this year’s assessment is the impact of injuries. Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jayson Tatum, perennial MVP contenders, find themselves lower on the list due to playoff exits and subsequent injury setbacks. This underscores a critical point: sustained dominance requires health. The ability to not only perform at an elite level but also *remain* on the court is becoming increasingly vital. The modern NBA, with its emphasis on physicality and pace, demands resilience.
The Value of Playoff Experience and Momentum
Players like Anthony Edwards and Jalen Brunson are benefiting from deep playoff runs. Edwards’ Timberwolves reached the Western Conference Finals, and Brunson led the Knicks to the Eastern Conference Finals and an NBA Cup victory. This experience isn’t just about statistics; it’s about the intangible benefits of high-pressure situations, the development of clutch performance, and the building of team chemistry. These factors translate directly into success at the start of the following season, creating a positive feedback loop.
The Shifting Landscape of Superstar Value
The trade of Luka Dončić to the Lakers adds another layer of complexity. While his individual brilliance remains undeniable, his impact is now being evaluated within a new context. Can he elevate the Lakers to championship contention, particularly as LeBron James nears the end of his career? This scenario highlights the importance of team fit and the ability to adapt to new surroundings. NBA.com provides further analysis on player trades and team dynamics.
Cade Cunningham’s Ascent and the Pistons’ Revival
Perhaps the most compelling story is that of Cade Cunningham. His breakout season coincided with the Detroit Pistons’ surprising rise in the Eastern Conference. Cunningham’s health, combined with his improved scoring and playmaking, has transformed the Pistons from a lottery team to a legitimate playoff contender. This demonstrates the power of a homegrown superstar to elevate an entire franchise.

Looking Ahead: The Future of NBA Player Evaluation
The debate over “Player of the Year” versus traditional MVP awards isn’t just about semantics. It reflects a broader shift in how we evaluate NBA players. The game is becoming increasingly complex, and a single statistic or award can no longer fully capture a player’s value. The ability to sustain excellence across multiple seasons, navigate injuries, and lead a team through the playoffs is becoming paramount.
As analytics continue to evolve, we can expect to see even more sophisticated metrics emerge that attempt to quantify a player’s overall impact. However, it’s crucial to remember that basketball is still a human game, and factors like leadership, chemistry, and resilience will always be difficult to measure. The players who can excel in all these areas – like Shai Gilgeous-Alexander – will be the ones who truly define dominance in the years to come.
What are your thoughts on the evolving criteria for evaluating NBA players? Share your opinions in the comments below!