Home » Technology » Mastering Go Strategy: Insights from Myung-hoon Kim and Yuta Iyama’s Round of 32 Match

Mastering Go Strategy: Insights from Myung-hoon Kim and Yuta Iyama’s Round of 32 Match

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

2024-01-11 15:02:01

〈Round of 32〉 ○ Myung-hoon Kim 9th dan ● Yuta Iyama 9th dan

Scene ④=AI’s strategy is mostly ‘throw away’. It is also consistent with the ‘10 Baduk results’ that repeatedly emphasize throwing away. However, the 9th Dan of Iiyama decided on a strategy of ‘catching’ instead of throwing away. That was the first step to defeat.

Black 1 is a huge mistake. The win rate is dropping by regarding 30% at once. Iyama wanted to break with the black 3 and catch the white of his ears. He thought that the practical benefits were great and that the black problem on the right would be solved by itself. However, Black 3 made a bigger mistake and ended up losing. Iyama would have wanted to cry later while recalling it. He would have repeatedly lamented that he was blind to catching stones.

◆AI’s solution 1=For AI that hates being blocked the most, Black 1 is very natural. White breaking with 2 and trying to catch with 4 does not work well on black 7. AI determines that if Black goes 1, it is a 5-on-5 fight from this point on and Black has the slightest advantage.
◆AI’s solution 2=It’s a little late, but I had to endure it with black 1 and 3 instead of quitting even now. The back four had to be allowed to connect. He may have made a decisive decision, thinking that cutting off was the only way to win, but that was the path to defeat. It’s surprising that even a master like Iyama sometimes falls into such delusion.

Park Chi-moon, Baduk columnist

1704991295
#삼성화재배 #AI와 #함께하는 #바둑 #해설 #Iyama #blind

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.