The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI had filed bails in the Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the potential legal ramifications for Imran Khan following the rejection of his bail pleas?
## Imran Khan’s Bail Plea Rejected in 8 May 9 Cases
**Interviewer:** Joining us today is legal analyst Alex Reed to discuss the latest developments in the Imran Khan case. The Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore has rejected bail applications in eight cases related to the May 9 riots. Can you shed some light on the details of these cases?
**Alex Reed:** Certainly. These eight cases stem from the unrest that erupted following Imran Khan’s arrest in May. The court has rejected bail pleas for various charges, including the attack on Jinnah House and arson incidents at Shadman police station, Rahat Bakery Chowk, and Zaman Park. Additionally, charges related to the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 incidents are also included.
**Interviewer:** Mr. Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, presented a strong argument for his client. Can you summarize the key points of his defense?
**Alex Reed:** Yes, Mr. Safdar argued that the public’s response was a reaction to Mr. Khan’s opinions and not a premeditated act. He highlighted the numerous cases filed against Mr. Khan, arguing that accusations are being made indiscriminately without solid evidence. Interestingly, he pointed out that Mr. Khan has received relief in several cases from lower courts, suggesting a pattern of inconsistent accusations.
**Interviewer:** The court ultimately rejected the bail pleas. What are the implications of this decision for Mr. Khan and his supporters?
**Alex Reed:** This decision is a significant setback for Mr. Khan, as it means he will remain in custody while these cases proceed. It is essential to remember that these are initial court decisions, and Mr. Khan’s legal team will likely appeal the rulings. This further prolongs the legal battle and continues to fuel political tensions in the country.
**Interviewer:** This case continues to be a complex and often contentious matter. Thank you for providing your insights on these developments, Alex Reed. We appreciate your time.
