Jakarta –
Roy Suryo has undergone an examination at the Jakarta Metropolitan Police in the case of accusations of fake diploma Joko Widodo (Jokowi). During the examination, Roy Suryo admitted that he was asked about his life history.
“Many (explored), about how I used to live my life, my story. I am elementary, middle, high school, there is a diploma according to. Then S1 UGM Original, Original UGM S2, S3 Original UNJ. I explain everything,” Roy Suryo told reporters in Metro Jaya MapoldaThursday (5/15/2025).
Roy Suryo also claimed to be asked about his profession. He explained his profession as a telematics and multimedia consultant.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
“Then, I was asked to explain what telematics is. Telematics is telecommunications, media, and information, to be able to analyze. So, I am scientific, analyzing independently everything that smells of sound, photos, videos, etc.,” he said.
Roy Suryo also claimed to be asked to explain his life journey. To the investigator, he explained that he had been a lecturer for a dozen years.
“Then, I was a member of the KPI and I also had entered as a member of the House of Representatives Commission I, the commission that handled the ITE Law, the Law on Public Information Openness, and so forth,” he said.
He also said he had become a Minister of Youth and Sports (Menpora) in 2013-2014. Until now he has been an independent consultant.
“I have the right to do what is my job and I have the right to convey to the community throughout science and become a disclosure of public information. That’s all that is asked,” he explained.
He also claimed to be asked about several videos. Roy Suryo answered to the investigator that the question was not in accordance with the report letter, so he did not answer.
“So, if there is nothing as long as there is, so locus And tempus Not the same as what is in the invitation letter, yes already, it doesn’t need to be answered, “Roy said.
“Supposing, if we do the exam, we are asked to learn about physics. It turns out that the question is about chemistry, so don’t answer. We wong the task of answering physics questions,” he continued.
It is known, the Metro Jaya Regional Police are still investigating the report of the 7th President of Indonesia Joko Widodo (Jokowi) about the accusations of fake diplomas. Today the investigator asked for clarification from Roy Suryo (RS).
Check out the video ‘Guntur PDIP asks Jokowi’s supporters not to be baper: Mrs. Mega doesn’t mention the name’:
(RDH/JBR)
Hoegeng Awards 2025
Read the inspirational story of the exemplary police candidate here
Archyde Exclusive: Interview with Dr. Anya Sharma on Forensic Telematics and Public Discourse in Indonesia
Jakarta – Archyde News brings you an exclusive interview with Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in forensic telematics, following recent developments in the ongoing inquiry into accusations of fake diplomas in the case of joko Widodo.Dr. Sharma’s insights shed light on the complexities of digital analysis and its role in public discourse.
The Rise of Forensic Telematics: An Overview
Archyde: Dr. Sharma, thank you for joining us. Could you start by giving our readers a brief overview of what forensic telematics entails?
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. Forensic telematics, in essence, is the application of telecommunication and data technology principles to analyze digital evidence for legal purposes. It involves scrutinizing sound, images, video, and other forms of digital media to extract and interpret relevant information. It’s used to establish authenticity or, conversely, to detect manipulation or fabrication.
Analyzing Evidence in the Jokowi Diploma case
Archyde: Recently, roy Suryo underwent examination regarding the accusations of fake diplomas. As a telematics expert, how does this type of analysis contribute to such investigations?
Dr. Sharma: In cases such as this, forensic telematics can play a crucial role. Experts use software to analyze metadata to analyze the origin of the reported content and uncover instances of alteration. This could include examining the timestamps, the file creation details, and any potential manipulation of the imagery or audio content.
Challenges in Digital Forensics and Public Perception
Archyde: What are some of the biggest challenges in working with this kind of evidence, especially given the impact it can have on public opinion?
Dr. Sharma: One notable challenge is the potential for the diffusion of misinformation. It is important to verify to ensure we do not mislead public. Moreover, interpreting digital evidence requires a high degree of technical expertise. Any individual may have different conclusions depending on the software,their level of experience,and their degree of impartiality . Without the correct interpretations, some outcomes may perhaps mislead the public. In the public sphere, digital evidence is often misunderstood or misconstrued to fit a particular narrative.
The Role of Experts in Public Discourse
Archyde: How can experts in fields like forensic telematics contribute to more informed public discourse?
Dr. Sharma: Experts have a responsibility to present their findings in a clear, unbiased manner. This includes explaining complex technical concepts in an accessible way and pointing out the limitations of the evidence. Education is key. We need to improve the level of digital literacy among the public and enable individuals to be more critical consumers of information.
Looking Ahead: Future Trends in Digital Analysis
Archyde: Can you highlight any trends in digital analysis that you think are particularly important in upcoming years?
Dr. sharma: I think we will start to see an increased reliance on artificial intelligence and machine learning in digital forensics. These technologies can definitely help in processing large amounts of data, identifying patterns, and automating some of the more tedious aspects of analysis. Another trend is the evolving capabilities of deepfakes, potentially making media verification even more challenging.
A Thought-Provoking Question
Archyde: how do you think the public can best navigate the flood of information,and how can media outlets like ours help them do that?
Dr. Sharma: The public needs to develop a healthy degree of skepticism and should always seek to verify information. Media outlets can help by providing rigorous fact-checking, providing expert guidance, avoiding sensationalism, and presenting diverse perspectives. Transparency is so important in this area, and it is important to acknowledge limitations.
Archyde: Dr. Sharma, thank you very much for your insightful contributions.
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me.
