Defense department Faces Security Questions Over “Digital Escort” Tech Support
Washington D.C. – A former top official for the Defense Department has voiced serious concerns regarding a tech support practice involving “digital escorts,” a system he believes poses a meaningful security risk. John Sherman, who served as the Pentagon’s chief information officer under the Biden administration, stated he should have been aware of the arrangement. “This system is a major security risk for the department,” Sherman commented, calling for an immediate and extensive review by key agencies including the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and Cyber command.
DISA, responsible for the system, clarified that these experts operate under supervision and do not have direct, hands-on access to government systems. Instead,thay provide guidance and recommendations to authorized administrators who carry out the necessary tasks.Evergreen Insight: The reliance on external support for critical infrastructure, even with oversight, highlights a perennial challenge in government IT security. Ensuring that third-party personnel, nonetheless of their access level, adhere to the strictest security protocols is paramount. This situation underscores the need for continuous auditing and robust vetting processes for all individuals interacting with sensitive government data and systems.The existence of these “digital escorts” was not without prior warnings. Concerns about the escort strategy were raised by multiple individuals, even during its development phase. A former Microsoft employee involved in the company’s cybersecurity strategy reportedly opposed the concept, flagging it as too risky from a security standpoint.
Further complicating the issue, around 2016, Microsoft sought to engage Lockheed Martin to hire escorts for their project. A project manager involved in this interaction expressed reservations, questioning whether the escorts would possess the necessary “right eyes” for the job, citing concerns about the relatively low pay for such a critical role.microsoft has not provided comment on these specific points.
Evergreen Insight: The principle of “right eyes” is fundamental to cybersecurity. It refers to the expertise, judgment, and trustworthiness required to identify and mitigate threats. When compensation or training is misaligned with the criticality of the task, the risk of overlooking subtle but hazardous vulnerabilities increases considerably.This is a reminder that investing in skilled and motivated personnel is not merely an operational cost, but a cornerstone of effective security.
The practice’s exclusivity remains unclear, as other major cloud service providers serving the federal government declined to confirm if they also utilize similar digital escort arrangements. Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud opted not to comment on the record, while Oracle did not respond to requests for information.
Evergreen Insight: Transparency in the supply chain for cloud services is crucial for national security. When critical government functions rely on third-party providers,understanding their operational practices,including support models and personnel vetting,is essential. The reluctance of some major players to disclose such details raises questions about accountability and the potential for systemic vulnerabilities that could be exploited. This underscores the ongoing need for government agencies to demand greater transparency from their technology partners.
How does ProPublica’s non-profit funding model influence the types of investigations it undertakes?
Table of Contents
- 1. How does ProPublica’s non-profit funding model influence the types of investigations it undertakes?
- 2. ProPublica: A Deep Dive into Investigative journalism
- 3. The Origins and Mission of ProPublica
- 4. Core Areas of Investigative Focus
- 5. ProPublica’s Investigative Process: A Detailed Look
- 6. Landmark investigations & Their Impact
- 7. ProPublica’s Data Journalism & Tools
- 8. Benefits of Supporting Investigative Journalism Like ProPublica
- 9. Staying Informed: Following ProPublica’s Work
ProPublica: A Deep Dive into Investigative journalism
The Origins and Mission of ProPublica
ProPublica, established in 2007, stands as a unique force in American journalism.Unlike conventional news organizations reliant on advertising revenue, ProPublica operates as an independent, non-profit newsroom. This funding model – supported by philanthropy, grants, and individual donations – is central too its mission: to produce investigative journalism in the public interest. Its founders recognized a shrinking space for in-depth reporting at mainstream media outlets, creating a dedicated platform for uncovering abuses of power and exposing wrongdoing. Key to understanding ProPublica is its commitment to holding the powerful accountable.
Core Areas of Investigative Focus
ProPublica’s reporting spans a wide range of critical issues, but several areas consistently receive notable attention. These include:
government Accountability: Examining federal and state government operations, lobbying, and political influence.This often involves analyzing public records and utilizing data journalism techniques.
Corporate Accountability: Investigating the practices of large corporations, notably those impacting public health, safety, and the environment.
Social Justice: Reporting on systemic inequalities related to race, class, and gender, with a focus on civil rights and civil liberties.
National Security: Scrutinizing government surveillance, military contracting, and foreign policy.
Health & Medicine: Uncovering issues related to healthcare access, pharmaceutical safety, and medical malpractice.
ProPublica’s Investigative Process: A Detailed Look
ProPublica’s success isn’t simply about choosing crucial topics; it’s about how they investigate.Their process is rigorous and often lengthy, involving:
- Initial Tip & Research: Investigations often begin with a tip from a source, a public records request, or a pattern identified through preliminary research.
- Document Gathering: ProPublica journalists are adept at utilizing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, court records, and other publicly available data.
- Source Progress: building trust with confidential sources is crucial. Protecting these sources is a paramount concern.
- Data Analysis: Large datasets are frequently analyzed to identify trends and patterns that would otherwise remain hidden.This is where data analysis skills are vital.
- Fact-Checking & Legal Review: Every story undergoes multiple layers of fact-checking and legal review to ensure accuracy and minimize legal risk.
- Publication & Collaboration: ProPublica often partners with other news organizations to amplify the reach of its investigations.
Landmark investigations & Their Impact
ProPublica’s work has led to significant real-world consequences. Here are a few notable examples:
Lost Mothers (2017-2018): This series investigated the rising maternal mortality rate in the United States, particularly among Black women. The reporting prompted congressional hearings and spurred legislative action to address the crisis.
Machine Readable (2020): Revealed how hospitals routinely charge patients significantly more for the same services, highlighting a lack of price clarity in healthcare.
Dollars for Docs (Ongoing): A running database tracking payments made by pharmaceutical companies to physicians, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
Inside Track (2016): Exposed how elite universities give preferential treatment to wealthy applicants, sparking a national debate about college admissions.
Patient Zero (2023): Investigated the origins of the mpox (monkeypox) outbreak, revealing failures in public health response.
These investigations demonstrate the power of public interest journalism and the importance of independent reporting.
ProPublica’s Data Journalism & Tools
ProPublica is a leader in the field of data journalism. they not only analyze data but also make it accessible to the public. Key resources include:
The Nonprofit Explorer: A searchable database of nonprofit organizations’ finances.
Dollars for Docs: As mentioned above,a thorough database of pharmaceutical payments to physicians.
Documenting Hate: A collaborative project tracking hate groups and extremist activity in the United States.
Open-Source Tools: ProPublica frequently develops and releases open-source tools for data analysis and visualization, benefiting other journalists and researchers.
Benefits of Supporting Investigative Journalism Like ProPublica
Investing in organizations like propublica yields significant benefits for society:
Increased Transparency: Holding power accountable forces greater transparency in government and corporate operations.
Policy Change: Investigative reporting can led to legislative reforms and policy changes that address systemic problems.
Public Awareness: Raising awareness about critical issues empowers citizens to make informed decisions.
Strengthened Democracy: A well-informed public is essential for a functioning democracy.
Protection of Civil Rights: Exposing abuses of power helps protect the rights and liberties of individuals.
Staying Informed: Following ProPublica’s Work
There are several ways to stay up-to-date with ProPublica’s investigations:
Website: [https://www.propublica.org/](https://www.propublic