Bob Odenkirk: Why a ‘Better Call Saul’ Revival is Unlikely (And What It Means for the Future of Prestige TV)
Three years after the critically acclaimed finale of “Better Call Saul,” Bob Odenkirk has effectively closed the book on his iconic portrayal of the morally flexible lawyer, Saul Goodman. While the prospect of revisiting the meticulously crafted world of Jimmy McGill remains tempting for the actor, his recent statements suggest any immediate return to the courtroom, or rather, the prison yard, is highly improbable. This isn’t just a matter of one beloved show’s potential hiatus; it speaks volumes about the evolving landscape of serialized storytelling and the creative demands placed on its architects.
The Unyielding Prison Walls of Saul Goodman
Bob Odenkirk, speaking on the Today show, was candid about the unlikelihood of a “Better Call Saul” revival. He stated, “I don’t think so. I think they’ve all moved on to some more amazing projects that you’ll soon see.” This sentiment directly addresses the fate of his character, Saul Goodman (aka Jimmy McGill), who in the August 15, 2022, series finale, “Saul Gone,” accepted responsibility for his extensive criminal activities. The result? An 86-year prison sentence. As Odenkirk himself pointed out, “He’s not getting out [of prison]. If there’s another Saul show, it takes place inside prison.” This definitive conclusion, while perhaps satisfying in its finality for the character’s arc, presents a significant narrative hurdle for any continuation.
The Enduring Legacy of a Moral Compass Gone Awry
“Better Call Saul,” a prequel and sequel to the monumental “Breaking Bad,” carved its own niche in television history. Running for six seasons on AMC from 2015 to 2022, it explored the complex transformation of Jimmy McGill into the flamboyant, ethically compromised Saul Goodman. The show garnered numerous accolades, including multiple Golden Globe and Emmy Award nominations, testament to its compelling character development and masterful storytelling by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould. Odenkirk’s personal connection to the role is profound, stating, “That part turned my life around, and I’ve given more to that part than anything I’ve done.” For fans, the idea of more of this world, even within prison walls, holds undeniable appeal.
Beyond the Cell Block: What’s Next for “Better Call Saul” Creators?
Odenkirk’s assertion that Gilligan and Gould are focused on “more amazing projects” hints at a broader trend in television. The era of long-running, character-driven dramas that span multiple decades of a character’s life may be giving way to more focused, thematic explorations. The success of “Better Call Saul” was built on the intricate weaving of its narrative, a process that requires immense creative energy. It’s understandable that its creators would seek new challenges and avenues for storytelling. This shift away from sequels and revivals, particularly for shows that have reached a satisfying, albeit somber, conclusion, reflects a growing maturity in how television is conceived and executed.
The Rise of the Contained Narrative
The television landscape is increasingly valuing contained, self-contained narratives. Shows that offer a complete story with a clear beginning, middle, and end, even if lengthy, are becoming the gold standard. This approach allows creators to meticulously craft every element, ensuring thematic resonance and a powerful emotional impact without the pressure of endless continuation. For audiences, it offers a more curated viewing experience, knowing that the story will be told in its entirety. While the allure of revisiting beloved characters is strong, the artistic integrity of allowing a story to conclude definitively often trumps the temptation of perpetual sequels.
Implications for the Future of Television Storytelling
Bob Odenkirk’s comments serve as a subtle reminder that creative evolution is paramount. The success of “Better Call Saul” demonstrates the power of nuanced character studies and the potential for spin-offs to stand on their own. However, it also highlights the importance of knowing when a story has reached its natural end. As audiences become more discerning, demanding sophisticated narratives and meaningful conclusions, creators are empowered to pursue novel concepts rather than rehashing old ones. This bodes well for the future of television, suggesting a continued drive towards originality and artistic ambition.
The Value of Creative Closure
The “Better Call Saul” experience, from its inception as a “Breaking Bad” offshoot to its poignant finale, exemplifies the benefits of a well-planned arc. The show wasn’t afraid to delve into the darker aspects of its protagonist’s journey, offering a nuanced look at the choices that define us. The creators’ decision to bring the story to a definitive close, even if it means no further installments, ultimately serves the narrative and the characters involved. This commitment to creative closure, rather than an indefinite extension, is a hallmark of high-quality television and something audiences are increasingly coming to expect and appreciate.
The willingness of talents like Odenkirk to acknowledge the natural progression of creative endeavors, even when it means closing doors on beloved characters, is a sign of a healthy industry. While we may not see Saul Goodman navigating new legal (or illegal) predicaments anytime soon, the legacy of his story, and the creative prowess behind it, will undoubtedly shape future television narratives. What are your thoughts on the current trend of TV revivals and continuations? Share your opinions in the comments below!
