Beyond the Mount Rushmore: Why Pro Wrestling’s Legends Are Now Ranked by ‘Grandfathers’
The very question of who deserves a spot on professional wrestling’s Mount Rushmore has become predictable, even stale. But CM Punk’s recent suggestion of a “Six Grandfathers” approach isn’t just a clever way to avoid the overdone debate – it signals a fundamental shift in how wrestling fans, and the industry itself, are evaluating legacy. It’s a move away from simply crowning ‘the greatest’ and towards recognizing the multifaceted contributions that truly build a sport, and it hints at a future where wrestling history is viewed with far more nuance.
The Problem with Four: Why Wrestling Needs a Wider Lens
Punk, speaking on “Pardon My Take,” articulated the core issue: four is simply too limiting. As he pointed out, selecting just four figures from baseball’s history in any era is a far more straightforward task than choosing wrestling’s quartet of icons. This isn’t because wrestling lacks talent, but because its impact is so diverse. The sport blends athleticism, storytelling, character work, and business acumen in a way few others do. Reducing a lifetime of contribution to a single, easily digestible ranking feels reductive.
“Four is hard!” Punk admitted. His “Six Grandfathers” concept, referencing the original name of the monument before the presidential faces were carved, acknowledges this complexity. It allows for a broader representation of the different pillars that support professional wrestling’s foundation. This isn’t just about adding more names to a list; it’s about acknowledging the different *types* of greatness within the industry.
Who Makes the Cut? Punk’s Initial Pantheon
Punk’s initial picks offer a glimpse into this evolving criteria. Bret Hart, lauded for his technical mastery and in-ring psychology, topped his list. Punk rightly highlighted Hart’s near-perfection across all aspects of the craft, even acknowledging criticisms of his microphone skills. The swift addition of Roddy Piper, a master of promo work and chaotic energy, underscored the importance of charisma and the ability to connect with an audience.
Further names floated – Terry Funk, embodying hardcore wrestling’s rebellious spirit; Eddie Guerrero, a captivating performer with unparalleled storytelling ability; and Harley Race, a symbol of old-school toughness and championship prestige. These aren’t simply “great wrestlers”; they represent distinct eras, styles, and contributions to the art form. The struggle to land on a sixth name, however, reveals the inherent difficulty – and the value – of this expanded perspective.
The Rise of the ‘All-Rounder’ and the Dismissal of the Flash-in-the-Pan
Punk’s preference for wrestlers who “wore different hats” is a crucial insight. He explicitly steered clear of simply naming the most technically gifted or the biggest box office draws. Instead, he valued those who excelled in multiple areas. This trend reflects a growing appreciation among fans for wrestlers who can seamlessly transition between roles – from in-ring competitors to compelling characters to effective storytellers.
The swift dismissal of Logan Paul as a potential candidate, despite his rapid skill acquisition, is telling. Punk, a self-described “wrestling history buff,” rightly pointed out that true legacy isn’t built on speed of learning, but on sustained contribution and a deep understanding of the industry’s traditions. This highlights a growing resistance to celebrity crossovers who lack a genuine connection to wrestling’s core principles. Wrestling Inc. provides a full transcription of the interview.
The Future of Wrestling Rankings: Beyond Individual Glory
The shift from “Mount Rushmore” to “Six Grandfathers” isn’t just a semantic change. It’s a reflection of a broader trend towards a more holistic evaluation of wrestling legacies. Expect to see more discussions focusing on a wrestler’s overall impact – their influence on subsequent generations, their contributions to different styles, and their ability to evolve with the times.
This also suggests a potential future where wrestling promotions prioritize developing “all-rounder” talent – performers who are not only skilled in the ring but also possess strong character work, promo abilities, and a deep understanding of the business. The days of relying solely on athletic prowess or pre-packaged personas may be numbered. The emphasis will be on creating wrestlers who can truly connect with audiences on multiple levels.
What are your “Six Grandfathers” of professional wrestling? Share your picks and reasoning in the comments below!
