Home » world » Trump’s Gaza Plan: Achcar Calls It “Slapdash” Peace Effort

Trump’s Gaza Plan: Achcar Calls It “Slapdash” Peace Effort

by James Carter Senior News Editor

The Gaza Plan’s Fatal Flaws: Why Trump’s “Peace” Deal Risks a Perpetual Conflict

Over $31 billion in aid has been pledged to Gaza since 2007, yet the underlying political issues remain unresolved, fueling cycles of violence. The recent ceasefire, while welcome, masks a deeper problem: the fundamental unsustainability of imposed solutions. Dr. Gilbert Achcar, author of “The Gaza Catastrophe,” argues that Donald Trump’s peace plan wasn’t just flawed – it was “completely botched from the start,” and his analysis reveals why a focus on power dynamics, rather than genuine diplomacy, guarantees continued instability.

Deconstructing the Illusion of a Two-State Solution

The core of Achcar’s critique centers on the plan’s disregard for Palestinian self-determination. While ostensibly offering a path to a two-state solution, the proposed map effectively cemented Israeli control over key territories, offering Palestinians a fragmented, economically unviable state. This isn’t a peace plan, Achcar contends, but a formalized system of occupation disguised as negotiation. The plan’s emphasis on economic incentives, without addressing fundamental political rights, was a deliberate attempt to bypass the core issues of land, borders, and sovereignty. This approach, he argues, is a recipe for resentment and future conflict.

The Role of Regional Power Brokers

The Trump plan wasn’t created in a vacuum. It was heavily influenced by the shifting alliances and ambitions of regional powers, particularly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. These nations, prioritizing their own security concerns and alignment with Israel against Iran, were willing to overlook Palestinian grievances in exchange for strategic benefits. Achcar highlights how this dynamic effectively sidelined the Palestinian Authority and undermined any genuine prospects for a negotiated settlement. The plan’s success, therefore, hinged on maintaining this fragile coalition, a precarious foundation for lasting peace.

Beyond Trump: The Enduring Architecture of Conflict

While the Trump administration is no longer in power, the underlying structural issues Achcar identifies remain. The fundamental imbalance of power between Israel and Palestine, coupled with the continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, creates an environment where genuine negotiation is virtually impossible. The international community’s reluctance to hold Israel accountable for violations of international law further exacerbates the problem. This isn’t simply about a failed peace plan; it’s about a deeply entrenched system that perpetuates conflict.

The Economic Trap and the Cycle of Dependency

The plan’s heavy reliance on economic investment as a substitute for political rights is particularly dangerous. While economic development is undoubtedly important, it cannot address the fundamental grievances of a population denied self-determination. In fact, it can create a cycle of dependency, where Palestinians become reliant on external aid and further entrenched in their subordinate position. This echoes historical patterns of colonial control, where economic concessions were used to pacify populations while maintaining political dominance. A more sustainable approach requires empowering Palestinians to control their own economy and resources.

Future Trends: A Looming Humanitarian Crisis and the Rise of Non-State Actors

Looking ahead, the situation in Gaza is likely to deteriorate further. The blockade, coupled with the ongoing political stalemate, is creating a humanitarian crisis of immense proportions. The lack of economic opportunity and the pervasive sense of hopelessness are fueling radicalization and the rise of non-state actors like Hamas. Without a fundamental shift in approach – one that prioritizes Palestinian rights and addresses the root causes of the conflict – we can expect to see continued cycles of violence and instability. The current trajectory points towards a protracted conflict, not a lasting peace. The potential for escalation, particularly if regional tensions with Iran continue to rise, is significant. UNRWA’s reports consistently highlight the deteriorating conditions in Gaza, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

What are your predictions for the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.