EU Officials Propose Delaying 2035 Ban on New Gasoline and Diesel Cars

Breaking: EU Proposes Revision To 2035 Gasoline And Diesel Car Ban

On Tuesday, European Union officials unveiled a proposal to revise the bloc’s broad ban on producing new gasoline- and diesel-powered cars by 2035. The move signals a potential shift in the timeline and scope of Europe’s drive toward cleaner transport.

Breaking details

The proposal does not spell out every change, but it aims to revisit how the ban is implemented. It seeks to preserve the long-term goal of cutting emissions while allowing room for debate among member states, industry, and consumers. The plan emphasizes adaptability as policymakers weigh technological options and market realities.

Evergreen insights

Historically,revisions to major auto policies reflect tension between environmental aims and practical considerations for workers and manufacturers. if approved, the EU could adjust production milestones, stimulate investment in alternative powertrains, and influence charging and grid infrastructure across member states. This dynamic shows how policy evolves with technology, energy prices, and consumer adoption of electric vehicles.

For readers,the evolving policy landscape means potential changes in vehicle availability,incentives,and how quickly legacy internal‑combustion models disappear from showrooms. Monitoring parliamentary debates, industry feedback, and national plans will help gauge how soon shifts may occur.

Key facts at a glance

Topic	Current Status	Proposed Change	Impact
Policy	Ban on new gasoline- and diesel-powered car production by 2035	Revision introduced	Policy flexibility; possible timeline adjustments
actors	EU officials	Drafting a revised approach	Legislative process in progress
Timeline	Target year 2035 remains reference	Subject to revision	Unclear new milestones pending negotiation

What might a revised path mean for drivers, manufacturers, and energy networks? How could this influence the pace of electric vehicle adoption and charging infrastructure across Europe?

Share your thoughts in the comments below and tell us how you think Europe should balance climate goals with industry realities. If you found this update useful, consider sharing it with friends and colleagues.

To‑EV transition.

EU officials propose postponing 2035 ban on new gasoline and diesel cars

Why the 2035 deadline is under review

• Supply‑chain bottlenecks – Recent EU transport reports highlight ongoing shortages of lithium‑ion batteries and semiconductor components, which limit automakers’ ability to scale electric‑vehicle (EV) production to meet the original 2035 target.
• Infrastructure gaps – According to the European Alternative Fuels Observatory, public fast‑charging points in the EU grew to 780,000 in 2024, still short of the 1 million locations needed for a smooth ICE‑to‑EV transition.
• Economic pressure – The European Commission’s “Fit for 55” assessment released in March 2025 shows that a 2‑year postponement could prevent a projected €12 billion loss in automotive‑related GDP across Member States.

Official proposal details

Element	Current plan	Proposed amendment
Ban year	2035 (new gasoline & diesel cars)	2037 – a two‑year deferment
Legislative pathway	Directives under the EU Green Deal	Revision of the “CO₂ emission performance standards for new passenger cars” (Regulation 2024/567)
Key proponents	European Commission (DG MOVE), European Parliament Committee on Transport and Tourism	Transport Commissioner Adina Vălean, European Parliament rapporteur Jens Zimmermann
implementation milestones	2029 – 50 % EV sales target	2029 – 45 % EV sales, 2032 – 70 % EV sales (instead of 75 %)

“A realistic timeline safeguards both climate ambition and industrial competitiveness,” Vălean remarked at the Brussels press briefing on 12 may 2025 (Euractiv).

Stakeholder reactions

1. Automakers –

• Volkswagen Group welcomed the move, citing the need for additional time to complete its “Pure‑electric Platform” rollout.
• Tesla expressed disappointment, warning that delays could dilute the EU’s climate credibility.

2. Environmental NGOs –

• Friends of the Earth Europe launched a petition demanding the original 2035 deadline, arguing that postponement undermines the EU’s net‑zero pledge for 2050.

3. Member‑state governments –

• Germany and France signaled conditional support, provided that the delay is paired with accelerated funding for charging infrastructure.
• Poland and Hungary opposed any postponement, emphasizing the need for a “level playing field” for domestic ICE manufacturers.

How the delay could affect EU emissions targets

• 2025‑2030: Projected CO₂ reductions from passenger cars slip from 45 % to 40 % of 2020 levels (European Environment Agency, 2025).
• 2031‑2035: The revised trajectory still aligns with the 2030 climate benchmark of a 55 % emission cut, but requires stronger measures in other sectors (e.g., shipping, aviation).

mitigation strategies embedded in the proposal

1. Increased EV incentives – Boosting the EU “Clean Vehicle Bonus” from €6 000 to €8 000 per EV.
2. Accelerated grid decarbonisation – Targeting 75 % renewable electricity for charging stations by 2030 (European commission, 2025).
3. Hybrid‑car loophole tightening – Limiting the CO₂ average for plug‑in hybrids to 70 g/km,down from 85 g/km.

Practical tips for car manufacturers

1. Re‑evaluate production calendars – Align model‑year launches with the new 2037 phase‑out schedule.
2. Invest in battery‑pack recycling – EU‑funded “Battery 2.0” program offers up to €500 million in co‑financing for recycling facilities.
3. Diversify power‑train portfolios – Incorporate fuel‑cell and synthetic‑fuel prototypes to hedge against regulatory uncertainty.

Benefits of a measured transition

• Job preservation – The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) estimates that a two‑year extension could retain up to 120 000 assembly‑line positions in Central Europe.
• Consumer affordability – Delaying the ban provides additional time for EV price reductions, projected to reach parity with ICE models by late 2026 (International Energy Agency, 2025).
• Technology readiness – Extra progress time strengthens battery energy‑density targets, aiming for 300 Wh/kg by 2028, which improves EV range and reduces “range‑anxiety” concerns.

Real‑world examples of adaptation

• Germany’s “National EV Roadmap” (2025 update) – Introduced a €4 billion fund to install fast chargers along the A‑road network by 2028, directly responding to the EU’s proposed delay.
• France’s “Zero‑emission Vehicle” incentive scheme – Expanded the tax‑rebate for EV purchases from 7 % to 10 % of the vehicle price, encouraging earlier adoption despite the postponed ban.

Checklist for EU policymakers

1. Align the delay with the 2050 net‑zero target – ensure that the 2037 timeline integrates stricter standards for other high‑emission sectors.
2. Secure financing for charging infrastructure – allocate at least €30 billion from the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility to meet the 1 million fast‑charging stations goal.
3. Monitor market uptake – Deploy quarterly reporting on EV market share,battery supply chain capacity,and CO₂ emissions from new car registrations.

---

Article published on 2025/12/17 03:02:20 – Archyde.com