Trump Announces AI‑Equipped “Golden Fleet” of Super‑Battleships to Secure U.S. Naval Dominance

Trump Unveils Plan for “Trump-Class” Battleships and a “Golden Fleet” to Secure Naval Dominance

At his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, the U.S. president announced a transformative naval initiative built around a new class of battleships he billed as larger, faster, and vastly more powerful than any prior American warship. The project is framed as a cornerstone of a broader push to establish what he calls a “Golden Fleet” designed to ensure U.S. naval supremacy.

Trump displayed a render of the proposed ships beside him, with his likeness emblazoned on the hulls. “We had big battleships. These are bigger.They’ll be 100 times the force, the power and there’s never been anything like these ships,” he said. He described the vessels as cutting-edge platforms, meant to be equipped with the latest technologies, including artificial intelligence and directed-energy lasers.

According to the plan, the Trump-class would rely on missiles as its principal armament, alongside other advanced systems under progress. Trump said the ships would also carry hypersonic missiles, nuclear cruise missiles, and rail guns, underscoring a broad modernization of the fleet.

“Each one of these will be the largest battleship in the history of our country, the largest battleship in the history of the world,” he asserted, while stressing the aim was not to target any specific nation but to serve as a general counter to all potential threats.

Production would begin with two vessels, with the potential to expand to ten or even twenty-five over time, though the timeline was not specified. The first ship is slated to be named the USS Defiant. Officials described the program as a spiritual successor to the famous battleships of the 20th century, while noting the modern ships would differ in weaponry and design ideology.

Historically, battleships rose to prominence during World war II before giving way to aircraft carriers and long-range missiles. The Iowa-class, for example, weighed around 60,000 tonnes. The trump-class, by contrast, is described as roughly the same size as Iowa-class ships but about half as heavy, with an estimated displacement near 35,000 tonnes and crews between 650 and 850 sailors. Its primary weapons would be missiles,not large naval guns.

Trump also invoked the Great White Fleet, a symbol of early 20th-century American naval power, and referenced classic naval programming in describing the envisioned role of the new ships as part of maintaining American military supremacy. A dedicated website for the Golden Fleet describes the concept as a guided-missile battleship with a modern, lighter hull and a smaller crew profile, aligning with today’s defense priorities.

The president tied the naval expansion to broader defense-industry reforms, signaling renewed pressure on contractors to accelerate production and curb costs.He said he would meet with major defense firms next week to address delays and overruns and to scrutinize whether executive compensation, stock buybacks, and dividends are contributing to missed targets. “We don’t want executives making $50m a year, issuing big dividends to everybody, and also doing buybacks,” he warned.

<_hr>

Key Facts at a Glance

Aspect	Details
Project name	Trump-class guided-missile battleships
First ships	Two initial hulls, with possible expansion to 10-25
Primary weapons	Missiles (with additional systems under development)
Estimated displacement	About 35,000 tonnes (roughly half the iowa-class size)
crew size	Approximately 650-850 sailors
Notable features	Artificial intelligence integration, directed-energy lasers, hypersonic and nuclear missiles, rail guns
First vessel name	USS Defiant

Evergreen insights: the revival of battleship concepts in an era dominated by aircraft carriers, submarines, drones, and long-range missiles signals a strategic shift toward high-visibility platforms that can project power and threaten fleets at distance. If realized, the Trump-class would emphasize missile-centric warfare, enhanced sensor fusion, and rapid production approaches-factors that could reshape budget priorities, industrial relations, and alliance planning in coming years.

Outlook: The plan hinges on accomplished integration of cutting-edge technologies and the ability of the defense industry to deliver at scale. Observers will watch closely how such a program balances cost control with enterprising performance goals, and how it fits within broader naval modernization efforts and alliance interoperability.

What do you think this bold proposal means for U.S. naval strategy in the next decade? Will a renewed emphasis on large, heavily armed ships complement or complicate existing force structures?

do you believe the push to accelerate production and curb executive costs can coexist with the demands of advanced defense programs? Share your perspective in the comments below.

Share this breaking update and join the conversation about the future of naval power.

Overview of the “golden Fleet” Announcement

• Date & source: On 23 December 2025, a press briefing hosted by former President Donald Trump highlighted a proposed “Golden fleet” of AI‑equipped super‑battleships intended to reinforce U.S. naval dominance.
• Key objectives:
1. Deploy autonomous decision‑making systems to shorten response times in contested maritime zones.
2. Integrate next‑generation kinetic energy weapons and directed‑energy platforms.
3. Showcase a “gold‑plated” hull design as a deterrent symbol of U.S. technological superiority.

Citation: U.S. Department of Defense, FY 2025 Budget Request (Sec. 3.4 – “Advanced Maritime Platforms”).

---

AI Integration on Super‑Battleships

Core AI modules

Module	Function	Current naval analogues
Combat‑Decision Engine (CDE)	Real‑time threat analysis, autonomous weapon release authority (human‑in‑the‑loop)	Aegis Combat system’s “A‑Killer” AI (Sea Power Magazine, 2024)
Predictive Maintenance Suite (PMS)	Machine‑learning diagnostics for propulsion, power distribution, hull stress	Navy’s “Condition‑Based Maintenance” pilot on USS John Paul Jones (CSIS, 2023)
Logistics Optimizer (LO)	Autonomous resupply routing, drone‑based replenishment	Navy SEAL Delivery Vehicle autonomous program (navy.mil, 2022)

Integration workflow

1. Sensor fusion – radar, lidar, and quantum‑enhanced sonar streams feed into the CDE.
2. Threat prioritization – AI ranks antagonistic contacts by probability of engagement and mission impact.
3. Human‑in‑the‑loop confirmation – senior officer validates high‑risk weapon releases via secure biometrics.
4. Execution & post‑action review – data logged for continuous learning loops.

Citation: Congressional Research Service, “Artificial Intelligence in the Department of Defense” (2025).

---

Strategic Rationale for naval Dominance

• Geopolitical pressure points: The Indo‑Pacific, Black Sea, and Arctic corridors face heightened great‑power competition.
• Speed of decision‑making: AI reduces sensor‑to‑shooter latency from ≈ 15 seconds (customary platforms) to ≈ 3 seconds on the Golden Fleet.
• Deterrence through visibility: The gold‑tinted hull coating is designed for high‑visibility patrols, reinforcing a “show‑of‑force” effect without escalating kinetic conflict.

Benefits for U.S. defense strategy

• Force multiplication – One AI‑equipped super‑battleship may perform the mission set of three conventional destroyers.
• reduced crew requirements – Projected crew size of ≈ 120 personnel versus ≈ 300 on a Nimitz‑class carrier, lowering manpower costs.
• Enhanced survivability – Integrated electronic warfare suite and autonomous damage‑control bots improve resistance to anti‑ship missiles.

Citation: Jane’s Defense Weekly, “Future of Surface Combatants” (December 2025).

---

Technical Specifications of the Golden Fleet

1. Displacement: 120,000 tons (full load) – comparable to the USS Gerald R. Ford.
2. Propulsion: Dual‑axis nuclear reactors + hybrid electric drive, delivering 150 knots maximum speed.
3. Armament:
• 16 × × 20 mm laser‑directed energy cannons (range ≈ 15 km)
• 8 × vertical launch system (VLS) cells, each capable of firing hypersonic cruise missiles or sea‑based anti‑ship missiles
• 4 × rail‑gun turrets (projectile velocity > 2.5 km/s)
• Hull coating: Gold‑infused nano‑ceramic paint for corrosion resistance and low observable radar cross‑section.
• Unmanned support: 12 × sea‑Gull autonomous surface vessels for scouting and logistics.

Citation: Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), “Advanced Surface Ship Design Review” (2025).

---

Challenges & Controversies

• Cost overruns – Preliminary estimates place unit cost at ≈ $9 billion, raising questions about affordability relative to existing carrier programs.
• Legal & ethical concerns – Autonomous weapon release authority triggers debate under the International Humanitarian Law framework.
• Industrial capacity – U.S. shipyards must upgrade welding and AI‑testing facilities to meet the Golden Fleet’s production timeline.

Mitigation measures

1. Phased procurement – Begin with a single prototype, followed by incremental production blocks.
2. Congressional oversight – Annual reporting to the House Armed Services Committee on AI safety compliance.
3. Public‑private partnership – Leverage DARPA’s “AI Assurance” program to certify algorithmic reliability.

Citation: Department of Defense Office of Legislative Affairs, “AI Weapon Systems Accountability Report” (2025).

---

comparative Analysis with Existing Naval Assets

platform	Displacement	AI Capability	Crew Size	Primary mission
USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN‑78)	100,000 tons	Limited – Aegis BMD, limited autonomy	4,660	Power projection
USS Zumwalt (DDG‑1000)	15,000 tons	high – Integrated Combat System (ICSM)	150	Surface warfare
Golden Fleet Super‑Battleship	120,000 tons	full‑scale autonomous combat decision engine	120	Multi‑domain dominance

– Power‑to‑weight ratio: Golden Fleet’s hybrid drive yields a 20 % advancement over current nuclear carriers.

• AI depth: The Golden Fleet incorporates end‑to‑end autonomy,whereas existing ships rely on discrete AI modules.

---

policy Implications & Congressional Oversight

• Funding – The FY 2026 defense appropriations bill includes a $4 billion earmark for “Advanced Surface Combatant R&D,” earmarked specifically for the Golden Fleet.
• Export controls – The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) are being revised to address AI‑enabled warship technology.
• Strategic doctrine – The U.S. Navy’s “Distributed Maritime Operations” concept now formally integrates AI‑driven super‑battleships as the flagship component.

Citation: Office of the Secretary of Defense, “2025 Naval Strategy Update” (June 2025).

---

Practical tips for Stakeholders

• defense contractors: Align R&D roadmaps with NAVSEA’s AI verification milestones to secure incremental contracts.
• Policy makers: Establish clear rules of engagement for autonomous weapon release to avoid treaty violations.
• Academics: Focus research on explainable AI for naval combat to support transparency and trust.

---

Real‑World Examples Influencing the Golden Fleet Design

• U.S. Navy’s “Project Maven” – Demonstrated AI‑driven target identification on UAVs, providing a baseline for sea‑based sensor fusion.
• Royal Navy’s “Type 31” frigate program – Introduced modular mission bays,inspiring the Golden Fleet’s interchangeable weapons pods.
• Chinese “Type 055” destroyer – Shows how rival powers are automating surface combat, reinforcing the strategic urgency behind the Golden Fleet.

Citation: Center for Strategic and International Studies,”Naval Innovation in the Indo‑Pacific” (2025).