Gas storage expansion accelerates in Texas and Louisiana as new caverns move toward construction
Table of Contents
- 1. Gas storage expansion accelerates in Texas and Louisiana as new caverns move toward construction
- 2. What this means for era of energy reliability
- 3. Project snapshot: key upcoming storage expansions
- 4. Why this matters for the energy landscape
- 5. Reader engagement
- 6. Ul>
- 7. Why Salt Caverns Are the Backbone of Modern AI Data Centers
- 8. Current Supply Constraints: What’s driving the Shortage?
- 9. How the Shortage Threatens AI Data Center Expansion
- 10. Grid Reliability risks Linked to cavern Scarcity
- 11. Real‑World Example: Texas AI Hub and the Salt‑Cavern Squeeze
- 12. Practical Tips for Data‑Center Operators Facing Cavern Constraints
- 13. Benefits of Proactive Cavern planning
- 14. Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Salt Caverns
Breaking developments show a ramp of planned gas storage projects moving from plans to construction across Texas and Louisiana. The effort aims to shore up supply redundancies in a market reshaped by rising data-center demand and the need for reliable power during fuel transitions.
Knolle’s FRESH project, positioned southwest of Houston, targets 26 billion cubic feet of capacity housed in two salt caverns. Officials say construction should commence in the latter half of 2026, signaling a notable step in expanding regional storage capacity to counterbalance disruptions and meet peak demand.
Enbridge is expanding its footprint with two facilities in the region-Moss Bluff in Texas and Egan in Louisiana-collectively adding about 23 Bcf. the increase will come online in stages between 2028 and 2033, reflecting a gradual deployment strategy rather than a single, upfront boost. the company also recently completed an expansion at its large Tres Palacios hub in South Texas and signaled further growth there, including three new caverns that will add 24 Bcf from 2028 to 2030.
Simultaneously occurring,Trinity gas Storage has advanced the milestone project in East Texas. The brand-new facility there already delivers 24 Bcf of storage, and in December the company approved an expansion to add another 13 Bcf by late summer 2026. Trinity’s approach leans on depleted reservoirs rather than salt domes, a notable choice among storage strategies.
jim Goetz, chief executive of Trinity, underscored the urgency of expanding storage to keep pace with the data-center boom and the need to provide solid redundancies for gas and power continuity. He described the current period as a pivotal “gas storage super-cycle 2.0,” noting that the market tends to swing between extremes and that the gap must be closed.
“The market is like a pendulum, swinging from one extreme to the next. Now we’re behind the curve, and we must catch up,” Goetz said.”It’s a problem that will be solved, but the path isn’t always clear. still,there’s to much riding on it to ignore.”
What this means for era of energy reliability
The push to expand storage capacity underscores a broader shift toward ensuring resilience amid increasing data-center energy needs and evolving gas-fired generation. As projects proceed, the industry is balancing different storage architectures-salt caverns versus depleted reservoirs-and aiming for online availability across a multi-year timeline.This approach helps utilities and customers hedge against supply disruptions and market volatility.
Project snapshot: key upcoming storage expansions
| Project | Location | Capacity Added (Bcf) | Key Form | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRESH (Freeport Energy Storage Hub) | Southwest of Houston, Texas | 26 | Two salt caverns | Construction expected H2 2026 |
| Moss Bluff expansion | Texas | Unknown (part of 23 total with Egan) | Storage facility | Online 2028-2033 (phased) |
| Egan expansion | Louisiana | Unknown (part of 23 total with Moss Bluff) | Storage facility | Online 2028-2033 (phased) |
| Tres Palacios hub expansion | South Texas | 24 | Three caverns | 2028-2030 |
| Trinity East Texas facility expansion | East Texas | 13 (additional) + 24 existing | Depleted reservoirs approach | Expansion approved December; completion by late summer 2026 |
Why this matters for the energy landscape
As data centers proliferate and firms seek reliable power, the ability to store gas for peak loads and outages becomes a strategic asset. The current wave of projects is designed to bring online substantial capacity over a multi-year horizon, reducing dependence on spot markets and enhancing grid stability. Industry leaders describe it as a necessary adaptation to a shifting energy mix and growing demand.
Two questions to consider: Will these new cavities and depleted-reservoir strategies deliver the versatility needed to stabilize prices and reliability for consumers? How will the pace of construction influence short-term energy markets and long-term planning for power generation?
Reader engagement
- Which storage project do you believe will most impact regional energy reliability in the next decade, and why?
- What trade-offs should operators weigh when choosing between salt caverns and depleted reservoirs for new storage capacity?
Ul>
Why Salt Caverns Are the Backbone of Modern AI Data Centers
- Geological stability – Salt formations are virtually impermeable, providing a natural barrier against water ingress and seismic activity.
- Thermal inertia – The high specific heat of salt rock allows it to absorb and dissipate heat generated by dense AI workloads, reducing the load on conventional HVAC systems.
- Scalable volume – A single cavern can hold millions of cubic meters of liquid cooling fluid or compressed air,supporting megawatt‑scale power draws without surface footprint expansion.
These attributes make salt caverns the preferred underground “thermal batteries” for hyperscale AI clusters that consume 10‑30 MW per pod.
Current Supply Constraints: What’s driving the Shortage?
- Surge in AI-driven workloads – Global AI training spend hit $120 B in 2024, with a 45 % YoY increase in demand for high‑density compute.
- Competing energy‑storage projects – Renewable‑energy firms are converting the same caverns into compressed‑air energy storage (CAES) and hydrogen depots, creating a “resource tug‑of‑war.”
- Regulatory bottlenecks – New environmental impact assessments (EIAs) in the United States and Europe have extended permitting times from 12 to 24 months.
- Geopolitical supply chain shocks – export restrictions on drilling equipment from key manufacturers in Asia have slowed cavern excavation by roughly 30 % as Q3 2024.
The combined effect is a 30-40 % drop in newly certified cavern capacity year‑over‑year, according to the International Energy Storage Council (IESC) 2025 report.
How the Shortage Threatens AI Data Center Expansion
Capacity Limitations
- Power density ceiling – Without underground thermal mass, surface‑based cooling can only sustain ~5 MW per site before throttling AI training cycles.
- Increased capex – Operators must now allocate an extra $150 k-$200 k per MW for modular chillers, inflating total project budgets by 12‑15 %.
Project Timelines
| region | Average cavern lead time (months) | Impact on data‑center start‑up |
|---|---|---|
| Texas (U.S.) | 18 | Delays of 6-9 months for AI‑focused campuses |
| North Sea (Europe) | 22 | Pushes rollout to Q3 2026 |
| Western Australia | 16 | Forces relocation to existing legacy sites |
Competitive Landscape
- Cloud giants – Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure have begun allocating existing caverns for “AI‑Boost” zones, locking out smaller players.
- Edge AI clusters – Companies like Nvidia are forced to co‑locate edge nodes near existing storage caverns, limiting geographic diversity.
Grid Reliability risks Linked to cavern Scarcity
- Reduced CAES buffering – With fewer caverns available for compressed‑air storage, grid operators lose a low‑cost, fast‑response reserve, raising the frequency deviation risk during sudden renewable fluctuations.
- Higher reliance on battery farms – Lithium‑ion installations,which have a 30 % lower round‑trip efficiency compared with CAES,become the default,increasing overall system losses.
- Heat‑dump overload – Surface cooling towers for AI data centers discharge waste heat into municipal water supplies, raising local temperature baselines and straining thermal load management for the grid.
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) flagged a potential 0.8 % increase in reserve margin shortfalls for the Southwest interconnection if cavern supply does not improve by 2026.
Real‑World Example: Texas AI Hub and the Salt‑Cavern Squeeze
- Project: “DeepMind Dallas” – a 120 MW AI training campus announced in march 2024.
- challenge: Original plan called for three 40 MW caverns for liquid‑cooling loops. By july 2024, only one cavern received permit approval.
- Outcome:
- Phase 1 launched at 70 % capacity with temporary “dry‑cool” racks, increasing PUE from 1.20 to 1.45.
- Additional $45 M invested in a modular chilled‑water plant to compensate for missing underground thermal mass.
- Grid operator ERCOT reported a 5 MW spike in ancillary services demand during the ramp‑up, sourced from peaker gas turbines.
The case underlines how cavern scarcity can force data centers into less efficient cooling architectures, directly impacting both operational costs and grid stability.
Practical Tips for Data‑Center Operators Facing Cavern Constraints
- Hybrid cooling strategy
- Combine liquid immersion in smaller, modular underground tanks with air‑side economizers that leverage night‑time ambient temperatures.
- Locate near existing CAES sites
- Negotiating shared‑use agreements can unlock latent cavern volume without additional drilling.
- Invest in on‑site renewable generation
- Solar‑plus‑storage can offset the loss of grid‑level CAES, reducing reliance on external ancillary services.
- Adopt AI‑driven thermal management
- Real‑time predictive models can shift workloads to cooler zones, extending the life of surface chillers.
- Plan for phased cavern acquisition
- Secure option contracts for future cavern rights, locking in pricing before market tightens.
Benefits of Proactive Cavern planning
- Cost predictability – Early reservation of cavern space caps cooling‑infrastructure spend at 10‑12 % of total capex.
- Energy‑efficiency gains – Underground thermal buffering can improve PUE by 0.15-0.20 points, translating to annual energy savings of up to $12 M for a 150 MW campus.
- Grid support – Participation in CAES programs allows operators to earn ancillary‑service revenue,offsetting up to 3 % of operational expenditures.
- Regulatory goodwill – Demonstrating integrated energy‑storage solutions eases permitting negotiations with local authorities and environmental agencies.
Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Salt Caverns
| Choice | Typical Capacity | pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above‑ground liquid‑metal loops | 5‑15 MW per pod | Rapid deployment, no drilling | Higher material cost, limited scalability |
| Deep‑well geothermal cooling | 10‑30 MW per well | Synergy with renewable heat recovery | Site‑specific geology, higher upfront drilling |
| Subsurface aquifer heat exchangers | 8‑20 MW | Utilizes existing water tables | Requires stringent water‑quality monitoring |
| Modular containerized CAES | 2‑5 MW per unit | Relocatable, modular | Lower energy density, higher land use |
While these options can supplement capacity, most analysts agree that salt caverns remain the most cost‑effective, high‑density solution for large‑scale AI data center cooling and grid‑level energy storage through at least 2030.
