The Evolving Calculus of College Basketball Scheduling: Beyond Wins and Toward Sustainable Success
The pressure to fill arenas and boost RPI isn’t just about winning games anymore. Iowa Hawkeyes coach Ben McCollum’s philosophy, articulated in a recent press conference, highlights a growing trend in college basketball: a strategic shift in non-conference scheduling. It’s no longer simply about padding the win column; it’s about building a program resilient enough to navigate the increasingly complex landscape of the sport, and the upcoming game against UMass Lowell on December 29th is a small piece of that larger puzzle.
The Shifting Priorities of Non-Conference Play
For decades, the non-conference schedule was often viewed as a chance for power conference teams to rack up easy wins against smaller programs. While that still happens, the calculus is changing. The rise of multi-team events (MTEs) and the increasing emphasis on quality wins – even losses – are forcing coaches to rethink their approach. As McCollum suggests, the goal is to prepare for the grueling Big Ten schedule, not just to look good on paper.
This isn’t just about strength of schedule, though that’s a significant factor. It’s about identifying matchups that will genuinely test a team’s weaknesses and expose areas for improvement. A string of easy wins provides little valuable data. A challenging non-conference slate, even if it results in a few losses, can be a crucial learning experience. The Hawkeyes’ 10-2 record, including a 1-1 start in Big Ten play, suggests a balanced approach is already in effect.
The MTE Revolution and its Impact on College Basketball Scheduling
Multi-team events have become a cornerstone of modern non-conference scheduling. These tournaments, often held in neutral locations, offer a concentrated dose of competitive basketball. They provide opportunities to face a variety of opponents, test different strategies, and build team chemistry. The format also allows for more efficient travel and media exposure.
However, MTEs aren’t without their drawbacks. They can be expensive to participate in, and the quality of competition can vary widely. Coaches must carefully vet these events to ensure they align with their program’s goals. The upcoming schedule for Iowa, including matchups against UCLA and Illinois, demonstrates a commitment to high-level competition, even outside of conference play.
The Data-Driven Approach to Opponent Selection
Beyond simply choosing “good” teams, coaches are increasingly using data analytics to inform their scheduling decisions. Metrics like KenPom rankings, NET rankings, and even advanced statistical models are used to assess the potential value of each game. This data-driven approach allows coaches to identify opponents who will provide the optimal level of challenge and contribute to their team’s overall development.
For example, a coach might prioritize a game against a mid-major team with a strong offensive system, even if that team isn’t nationally ranked. The opportunity to defend a unique offensive style can be more valuable than a win against a weaker opponent. This is a subtle but significant shift in mindset.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Non-Conference Scheduling
The trend toward strategic non-conference scheduling is likely to continue, driven by several factors. The expansion of the NCAA Tournament field, while debated, could incentivize teams to prioritize quality wins over quantity. The increasing importance of the NET ranking, which heavily weighs non-conference performance, will also encourage coaches to be more selective.
We may also see a rise in international tournaments and exhibition games, as coaches seek to broaden their teams’ horizons and expose them to different styles of play. The globalization of basketball is creating new opportunities for cross-cultural competition and collaboration.
Ultimately, the goal of non-conference scheduling is to prepare a team for the rigors of conference play and the NCAA Tournament. Coaches like Ben McCollum are recognizing that this requires a more nuanced and strategic approach than simply chasing wins. The Iowa Hawkeyes’ upcoming game against UMass Lowell, while seemingly a routine matchup, is part of a larger, more deliberate plan for sustained success.
What are your predictions for the evolution of college basketball scheduling? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
Learn more about the NCAA NET ranking system
Explore our coverage of college basketball analytics
