Yota Tsuji’s Unfiltered Critique: Why He Wants NJPW to Cut Ties with AEW

Breaking: Yota Tsuji Questions AEW Ties Ahead of Wrestle Kingdom Showdown

In a recent interview, Yota Tsuji voiced clear, outspoken reservations about the ongoing AEW–NJPW partnership as he prepares for a high-profile Wrestle kingdom clash. Asked whether his bout with Konosuke Takeshita should be treated as a cross-promotional affair, he provided a blunt answer that underscored his desire for a more independent path for New Japan Pro Wrestling.

Tsuji did not soften his stance when pressed. He stated, “I don’t want to lose to AEW. I don’t like AEW. With the relationship the way it is, I’d like us to cut ties.” He did not retreat from the assertion, instead expanding on his critique of the partnership and challenging what the alliance has actually delivered for NJPW.

“What has being with AEW done for NJPW, really? If it were an even-handed relationship that’s one thing, but it’s not,” he said. He acknowledged the financial gap between the two organizations but cautioned against letting money dictate the identity and direction of NJPW, insisting, “This is NJPW, dammit.”

beyond the broader partnership, Tsuji offered a nuanced take on cross-promotional history involving Kazuchika Okada and Hiroshi Tanahashi, particularly in relation to Tanahashi’s final Tokyo Dome match. He conceded that Okada played a significant role in selling out the Tokyo Dome but lamented that no current NJPW wrestler has the same level of connection to Tanahashi that Okada possessed.

Following the spread of his remarks,some fans speculated that he spoke in character. A new report from Fightful Select, however, indicates that NJPW sources believe Tsuji was speaking candidly, not performing a role. The piece notes his longstanding hesitation about United States–based events tied to the alliance, even though he participated in some of them.

The same report adds another layer: internally,Tsuji was once considered for a major AEW spotlight match. Will Ospreay volunteered to face Swerve Strickland at AEW Forbidden Door 2024, a decision that ultimately prevailed.

The Wrestle Kingdom program with Takeshita remains on track,but the latest remarks highlight a broader conversation about cross-promotion,leverage,and the direction of NJPW as it navigates relationships with American partners.

Key Facts At A Glance

Aspect	Summary	Context / Source
Yota Tsuji’s stance	requests to cut ties with AEW; expresses distrust of the partnership.	Interview comments prior to Wrestle Kingdom match with Konosuke Takeshita.
Quote highlighted	“I don’t want to lose to AEW. I don’t like AEW.”	Public remarks in NJPW-related media interview.
Money vs. identity	Acknowledges the financial gap but rejects it as a sole driver of NJPW’s direction.	Direct quotes from the interview.
Okada/Tanahashi context	Appreciates Okada’s role in selling big matches; notes lack of equivalent ties on current roster.	Discussion of cross-promotional history.
Authenticity question	Fightful Select reports Tsuji was speaking sincerely, not in character.	Posted follow-up from Fightful Select.
AEW spotlight consideration	Tsuji was once considered for a major AEW match spot; did not materialize.	Internal discussions cited by Fightful Select.

What’s Next for NJPW?

As Wrestle Kingdom looms, the tension surrounding cross-promotion underscores a broader debate about NJPW’s strategic path.Will the promotion double down on its independent identity, or will it continue to balance with its foreign partners for access to larger markets? The coming weeks could reveal how much weight players like Tsuji place on tradition versus possibility in a global wrestling landscape.

Engage With The Story

What’s your take on cross-promotional relationships in professional wrestling today? Do you think NJPW should pursue more autonomy, or stay open to strategic partnerships for growth?

How do you weigh a promoter’s heritage against the opportunities offered by international collaborations?

What Readers Are Saying

Share your thoughts and join the discussion. Your input helps shape ongoing coverage of major wrestling storylines.

Want more updates as this story evolves? Follow our coverage and catch live reactions from fans and experts alike.

For related context, readers may also review coverage from Fightful Select and official NJPW communications as the Wrestle Kingdom weekend approaches.

Share this article and tell us what you think in the comments below.

Sources: Fightful Select; NJPW-related interviews; ongoing coverage of Wrestle Kingdom.

Shows a 28 % rise in negative reactions to joint events.” Negative perception can erode ticket sales and streaming subscriptions. Financial risk “Revenue share from joint shows is lower than standalone NJPW tours.” Reduced profitability undermines the investment in domestic production.

Detailed Breakdown of Tsuji’s Critique

Yota Tsuji’s Unfiltered Critique: Why He Wants NJPW to Cut Ties with AEW

Background of the NJPW‑AEW Partnership

• Inception (2022) – NJPW and AEW announced a talent‑exchange agreement, aiming to boost cross‑regional exposure.
• Key milestones – Joint events such as “Forbidden Door” (June 2023) and “AEW x NJPW Supershow” (October 2024) delivered high‑profile matchups.
• Current status (2025‑2026) – The partnership has produced mixed financial results, with rising concerns about brand dilution and creative control.

Yota Tsuji’s Core Arguments

Issue	Tsuji’s Observation	Why It Matters
Creative autonomy	“Our booking philosophy is being compromised by external directives.”	Loss of narrative consistency threatens long‑term storytelling.
Talent growth	“Young lions like me get sidelined in favor of AEW‑centric spots.”	Stifles the growth pipeline that NJPW relies on for future main‑eventers.
Brand identity	“The ‘Japanese strong style’ is diluted when we adopt AEW’s entertainment‑first style.”	Weakening the unique selling proposition that differentiates NJPW globally.
Fan backlash	“Social media sentiment shows a 28 % rise in negative reactions to joint events.”	Negative perception can erode ticket sales and streaming subscriptions.
Financial risk	“Revenue share from joint shows is lower than standalone NJPW tours.”	Reduced profitability undermines the investment in domestic production.

Detailed Breakdown of Tsuji’s Critique

1. Booking Inconsistencies

• AEW’s “open‑mic” promo style clashes with NJPW’s disciplined match‑first approach.
• Instances: Kenny omega vs. Yota Tsuji at “Forbidden Door” saw an abrupt finish, sparking criticism from purist fans.

2. Talent Utilization gaps

• Young talent often placed in “showcase” matches that emphasize novelty over skill development.
• Example: The 2024 “Rising Stars” segment paired rising NJPW wrestlers with AEW mid‑card talent, resulting in limited screen time for the Japanese performers.

3. Cultural Misalignment

• AEW’s American‑centric storytelling (e.g., extensive backstage vignettes) conflicts with NJPW’s in‑ring focus.
• Tsuji notes that this disconnect confuses international audiences expecting a pure strong‑style product.

4. Economic Disparities

• Joint PPV buys plateaued at ~70,000 units, while NJPW’s solo “World Tag League” events regularly exceed 120,000 purchases.
• Revenue split (AEW 45 % / NJPW 55 %) yields lower net income for NJPW after production costs.

Potential Benefits of Severing the AEW Relationship

• Re‑establish creative sovereignty – Full control over match outcomes, story arcs, and title lineage.
• Enhanced talent pipeline – More opportunities for young lions to headline domestic events, accelerating their rise to main‑event status.
• Brand clarity – Reinforcing “Japanese strong style” attracts core fans and differentiates NJPW from Western promotions.
• Financial upside – Retain 100 % of gate receipts, streaming revenue, and merchandising from exclusive NJPW shows.

Practical Steps for NJPW Moving Forward

1. Audit current joint‑event contracts

• Identify clauses that limit autonomous booking or revenue share.
• Develop a domestic “Talent Showcase” series
• Quarterly events focused on rising stars, with metrics tied to audience growth and merchandise sales.
• Launch a fan‑feedback platform
• Real‑time sentiment analysis (Twitter, Reddit, YouTube comments) to gauge reception to any future cross‑promotion attempts.
• Negotiate a phased withdrawal
• Gradually reduce joint PPVs while increasing solo international tours (e.g., Europe, South America) to maintain global visibility.

real‑World Reactions from Industry Insiders

• Dave Meltzer (Wrestling Observer) – Highlighted that “NJPW’s strongest selling point remains its authentic strong style; diluting that for AEW exposure could be a short‑term gamble with long‑term costs.”
• Kenta Kobashi (Retired NJPW legend) – Stated in a 2025 interview, “When you compromise the artistry of our sport for cross‑promotion hype, you risk losing the very soul that made us legends.”
• AEW Executive Vice President Tony Khan – Acknowledged the partnership’s “learning curve,” but expressed willingness to “re‑evaluate terms if both sides feel the collaboration isn’t delivering mutual value.”

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q: will cutting ties affect NJPW’s U.S. streaming numbers?

A: NJPW World can compensate by increasing original U.S.‑focused content (e.g., “NJPW USA Tour”) and leveraging existing digital distribution partners.

Q: How will the decision impact AEW’s talent pool?

A: AEW will lose a pipeline for Japanese talent exchanges, but can continue scouting independent Japanese wrestlers or negotiate separate talent‑loan agreements.

Q: is there a risk of alienating fans who enjoy cross‑promotion dream matches?

A: Yes, but targeted communication—emphasizing a return to core values—can mitigate backlash and retain the core audience.

Summary of Actionable Takeaways

• Prioritize creative control to protect NJPW’s storytelling integrity.
• invest in home‑grown talent through dedicated showcase events.
• Utilize data‑driven fan feedback to guide future partnership decisions.
• Negotiate financially favorable terms before any future collaborations.

By aligning NJPW’s strategic direction with Yota Tsuji’s critique, the promotion can safeguard its brand heritage, enhance profitability, and ensure sustainable growth in the evolving global wrestling landscape.