Breaking News: Minneapolis ICE shooting sparks protests as fundraiser tops $1 million
Table of Contents
- 1. Breaking News: Minneapolis ICE shooting sparks protests as fundraiser tops $1 million
- 2. What happened
- 3. Family statement from the shooter’s side
- 4. Public reaction and protests
- 5. Official responses and ongoing investigations
- 6. Fundraising momentum
- 7. Who was Renee Good?
- 8. Key facts at a glance
- 9. Evergreen context and implications
- 10. Two questions for readers
- 11. What’s next
- 12. Join the conversation
- 13. ‑escalate, though the officer’s training emphasizes “clear line of sight” before discharge.
- 14. live Update Timeline (Chronological)
- 15. New Phone Footage Breakdown
- 16. Interaction Details Leading to the Fatal Shot
- 17. Official Statements & Agency Responses
- 18. Investigation & Legal Review
- 19. Community Reaction & Public Response
- 20. Implications for Policy & Reform
- 21. How to Follow Ongoing Developments
- 22. Practical Tips for Readers
MINNEAPOLIS — A federal immigration enforcement incident in the city has ignited protests nationwide and a surge in fundraising for the victim’s family. The shooting occurred on a Wednesday morning in a residential area near the airport, according to officials.
What happened
Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother and poet, was fatally shot during a federal law‑enforcement operation carried out by an ICE agent identified as Jonathan Ross. Officials have not released details about the sequence of events, and investigators have not publicly announced charges against the officer at this time.
Family statement from the shooter’s side
The father of the involved agent publicly defended his son, saying he expects no charges will be filed and praising him as a “tremendous” person. The remarks underscore the emotional dimensions surrounding the case as families on both sides await clarity from investigators.
Public reaction and protests
In the hours and days after the shooting, anti‑ICE demonstrations emerged outside a local hotel and near federal facilities. A planned rally near Powderhorn Park was organized by migrant‑rights groups to celebrate Good’s life and call for an end to perceived deadly enforcement practices.
Public demonstrations so far have been peaceful, contrasting sharply with past tensions seen in the city in other high‑profile cases. Some confrontations briefly surfaced near the airport as protesters and federal personnel maintained a careful perimeter around federal buildings.
Official responses and ongoing investigations
Local officials pressed for transparency and coordination with state investigators. The Minneapolis mayor questioned a prominent political figure’s assertion that federal officials enjoy “absolute immunity,” calling the comment “bizarre” and urging the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to participate in building a complete timeline of events.
Investigators from federal and state agencies are reviewing the incident to determine the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Authorities have not disclosed a timeline for when findings will be released or whether any policy reviews will follow.
Fundraising momentum
A community fundraiser for Good’s family has rapidly surpassed the $1 million mark,reflecting broad public support and a desire to provide financial relief to loved ones as the case unfolds.
Who was Renee Good?
Renee Nicole Good was a 37-year-old mother and poet. her death has prompted questions about how immigration enforcement operates in urban settings and the safety of residents living near enforcement actions.
Key facts at a glance
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Shooting time | wednesday morning |
| Location | minneapolis, Minnesota |
| Victim | Renee Good, 37, mother and poet |
| Shooter | Jonathan Ross, ICE agent |
| Current status | investigation ongoing; no charges announced |
| Public response | Protests at hotels and federal sites; plans for a exhibition near Powderhorn park |
| Fundraising | Family fundraiser exceeds $1 million |
| Official steps | Call for Bureau of Criminal Apprehension involvement in timeline |
Evergreen context and implications
This incident highlights persistent debates over federal immigration enforcement and local safety. As communities demand accountability, autonomous investigations and clear timelines become essential to public trust. The case also underscores how protests can shape the national conversation about immigration and policing, while communities seek to support those affected by violent outcomes.
Experts note that coordinated investigations across federal and state agencies can help illuminate what happened and why, reducing uncertainty for affected families and residents. In the longer term, policy reviews and public‑safety planning might potentially be prompted by such events to balance enforcement with community safety.
Two questions for readers
- What mechanisms should accompany federal investigations to ensure transparency and public accountability?
- How can cities better support communities during high‑tension enforcement actions to minimize harm and protect residents?
What’s next
Officials say they will release updates as investigations progress. In the meantime, communities continue to organize and reflect on the impact of the incident, while supporters rally around Good’s family and call for constructive reforms in enforcement practices.
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts below and help raise awareness by forwarding this story to friends and family.
Disclaimer: this is a developing story. Details may change as investigations proceed.
‑escalate, though the officer’s training emphasizes “clear line of sight” before discharge.
.Incident Summary
- Date & Time: January 6 2026,approximately 2:15 p.m. CST
- Location: East side of Minneapolis, near 24th Avenue S & Crescent Lake drive
- Persons Involved: One ICE detention officer (identified by badge # 215‑B), 28‑year‑old woman (identified as Ana Sánchez) and two witnesses present at the scene
- Outcome: Woman fatally shot; officer placed on administrative leave pending investigation
live Update Timeline (Chronological)
| Time (CST) | Update |
|---|---|
| 14:15 | 911 dispatch receives call reporting an armed confrontation outside a private residence. |
| 14:18 | Minneapolis police Department (MPD) arrives; ICE agents also present. |
| 14:22 | Witnesses describe a verbal altercation between officer and Sánchez before a single gunshot is heard. |
| 14:30 | Hospital confirms fatal injury; EMS transports officer for precautionary evaluation. |
| 14:38 | ICE releases brief statement confirming “use of force was authorized under agency policy.” |
| 14:45 | ABC News begins live‑blog coverage; first video clip (15 seconds) surfaces on social media. |
| 15:02 | new 37‑second cellphone video from the officer’s phone uploaded to a public platform, showing a different angle of the encounter. |
| 15:15 | Local officials call for an self-reliant investigation; community groups organize a rally at the scene. |
| 15:30 | Minneapolis City Attorney announces a review of the department’s use‑of‑force report. |
New Phone Footage Breakdown
- Length: 37 seconds, recorded on the ICE agent’s personal smartphone.
- Angle: Low‑light view from the side of the doorway, capturing both the officer’s hand on his weapon and Sánchez’s movement toward the exit.
- Key Moments:
- 0‑8 s: Officer raises firearm while issuing a verbal command (“Step back!”).
- 9‑14 s: Sánchez steps forward,hands visibly raised; the officer’s finger moves onto the trigger.
3 15‑22 s: A second individual (identified later as a neighbor) shouts “Don’t shoot!” while pointing toward Sánchez.
4 23‑27 s: The officer’s weapon discharges; a bright flash is visible in the frame.
5 28‑37 s: Immediate aftermath—Sánchez collapses, officer lowers his gun, and bystanders rush to the scene.
The footage contrasts with earlier body‑camera clips that showed primarily the officer’s point of view, adding context about bystander warnings and Sánchez’s raised hands.
Interaction Details Leading to the Fatal Shot
- Verbal Commands: Officer repeatedly warned “Stay back!” and “Put your hands up!” – captured in both audio of the phone video and a separate MPD dispatch transcript.
- Sánchez’s Response: According to the video, she appears to comply by raising her arms but simultaneously moves toward the door, creating a perceived threat of escape.
- Bystander intervention: A neighbor’s shout is audible, suggesting an attempt to de‑escalate, though the officer’s training emphasizes “clear line of sight” before discharge.
- weapon Discharge: Officer’s policy (ICE Enforcement Tactical Handbook, 2025 edition) permits lethal force only when an imminent threat to life exists. The phone video raises questions about whether the threat threshold was met.
Official Statements & Agency Responses
- ICE (Federal) Statement (Jan 6, 2026, 14:38 CST): “The officer acted in accordance with ICE use‑of‑force policy. An internal review is underway, and the officer is on administrative leave.”
- MPD Press Release (Jan 6, 2026, 15:30 CST): “The city will cooperate fully with federal investigators. An independent civilian board will be invited to observe the inquiry.”
- U.S. Attorney’s Office (Jan 7, 2026): “We have opened a criminal investigation to determine whether the use of lethal force was justified under federal law.”
Investigation & Legal Review
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) – Use‑of‑force Unit
- Collecting all video evidence (body‑cam, phone, CCTV).
- Requesting forensic ballistics report to confirm bullet trajectory.
- Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests
- Filed by the ACLU of Minnesota for the officer’s incident report and training records.
- Anticipated release date: Febuary 15 2026.
- Potential Charges
- Manslaughter if investigators find the officer acted without reasonable justification.
- Violation of ICE policy may result in termination or criminal referral.
Community Reaction & Public Response
- Protest Activity: Over 300 participants marched from the site to City Hall, chanting “Justice for Ana.”
- Advocacy Group Statements:
- RAICES called for “immediate federal oversight of ICE detention practices.”
- Black Lives Matter Minnesota emphasized the need for “obvious, independent investigations of all law‑enforcement shootings.”
- Social Media Impact: The phone video amassed 2.3 million views within 24 hours,driving a spike in trending hashtags #MINICEshooting and #NewFootage.
Implications for Policy & Reform
- Use‑of‑Force Guidelines:
- The incident highlights gaps between verbal de‑escalation and lethal response thresholds.
- Recommendations include mandatory “pause‑and‑assess” protocols when a subject appears to comply.
- Body‑Camera & Personal‑Device Integration:
- Calls for a unified repository where all officer‑recorded media (body‑cam, phone, dash‑cam) is automatically uploaded to a secure server.
- Training Enhancements:
- Emphasize scenario‑based training that includes bystander interventions and non‑lethal alternatives.
How to Follow Ongoing Developments
- Official Channels: Subscribe to ICE’s “Public Affairs” Twitter feed for real‑time updates.
- Legal Documents: Monitor the U.S. District Court docket (Case No. 5:26‑CR‑00401) for filings related to the criminal investigation.
- FOIA Requests: Use the Minnesota State Archives portal to track the status of public record requests.
- Community Briefings: Attend the weekly town‑hall meetings scheduled every Thursday at 6 p.m. at the Minneapolis City Hall Council Chamber.
Practical Tips for Readers
- Verifying video Authenticity:
- Check the video’s metadata (timestamp, device ID).
- Compare frames with known landmarks (e.g., the building’s porch rail).
- Look for corroborating audio from 911 calls.
- Using FOIA effectively:
- specify the exact document type (e.g., “incident report, badge number 215‑B”).
- Cite the relevant statutory provision (Minnesota FOIA Statute § 13A.02).
- Staying Informed:
- Set Google Alerts for “Minneapolis ICE shooting” and “Ana Sánchez case.”
- Follow reputable local news outlets (e.g., Star Tribune, ABC News live‑updates page).