Brussels Weighs 100,000-Strong European Army to potentially replace U.S.Troops
brussels — EU governments are examining a plan to create a permanent European military force of about 100,000 personnel that could, in time, assume roles currently filled by American troops stationed in Europe. The idea was outlined by a senior European official during a speech in Sweden.
European Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius, a former Lithuanian prime minister, described the option as a concrete way to bolster Europe’s security adn reduce reliance on outside powers. He argued the continent must confront the question of how to replace a substantial portion of the U.S. force if it ever declines to remain in Europe.
The remarks come amid broader concerns within NATO about the durability of the Atlantic security partnership, spurred in part by U.S. President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about European defense commitments. This has prompted some capitals to accelerate efforts to strengthen their own militaries in response to Russia’s ongoing threats.
although the idea of a European army is not new, past efforts have stalled as governments balk at ceding sovereignty over national armed forces.Washington has continually encouraged European partners to assume greater obligation, including the possibility of redeploying U.S. troops to focus on challenges in the asia-Pacific region.
Kubilius also floated establishing a “European Security Council” to streamline defense decision-making across the continent. He described a council composed of ten to twelve key members, including both permanent and rotating players, tasked with addressing core strategic issues.
He stressed that the council’s top priority would be to influence the trajectory of the Ukraine crisis to prevent a Kyiv setback, urging a clear EU plan to alter the current dynamic. “We need a concrete answer on how the EU intends to change this scenario,” he said, calling for immediate consideration of a European Security Council.
PHOTO HENRIK MONTGOMERY, PROVIDED BY REUTERS
European Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius
Key Facts At a Glance
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Proposed force | Permanent European military force of about 100,000 personnel |
| Purpose | Potential replacement for U.S. troops in Europe and to strengthen continental defense |
| Decision body | European Security Council envisioned to speed defense decisions |
| Possible members | Major European powers; United Kingdom could be included as a permanent member |
| Priority focus | Ukraine dynamics and safeguarding Kyiv against defeat |
Context And Implications
Experts note that the European army concept is not brand new, but past attempts faltered as governments weighed sovereignty over their armed forces against collective European security needs.
Observers say a European Security Council could streamline debate and accelerate responses to security crises, though it would require careful alignment with existing European and transatlantic institutions. External partners, including NATO, would likely watch closely as the EU weighs deeper strategic autonomy while seeking to preserve a unified approach with allies. NATO remains a critical reference point for any shift in Europe’s defense architecture. For background, see official analyses from the European Commission and NATO.
evergreen Insights for the Long Term
If pursued, the European army would likely force a rethinking of defense procurement, command structures, and interoperability standards across EU member states. It could also prompt new funding models and the integration of rapid-reaction forces, cyber defenses, and intelligence-sharing protocols into a single continental framework.
For readers tracking regional security, the core question remains: how can Europe balance strategic autonomy with alliance obligations, while protecting the unity of its member states? The answer may hinge on a carefully designed European Security Council that preserves national sovereignty while enabling timely, coordinated action.
Two Questions for Readers
- Should the european Union pursue a permanent European army, even if it means redefining national sovereignty over defense?
- What would be the most significant benefit or risk of establishing a European Security Council with 10 to 12 members?
Share your views in the comments and join the discussion. If you found this briefing helpful, please share it with fellow readers.
Disclaimer: This analysis reflects policy discourse and does not constitute official EU policy. For updates from official sources, consult the European Union and NATO.
