Scleral tunnel incisions useful in eyes with compromised corneas

Breaking: Cataract Surgeons Embrace Scleral Tunnel Incisions too Shield Fragile Corneas

In a progress reshaping cataract care,many surgeons are now favoring scleral tunnel incisions for patients with compromised corneal tissue. The technique aims to preserve corneal integrity, minimize postoperative astigmatism, and improve comfort during healing.

Why the shift is occurring

Traditional clear corneal incisions are popular for their simplicity and rapid recovery. But in eyes with thinning, scarring, or irregular stroma, these corneal entries can compromise safety and slow healing. For patients with prior corneal procedures or diseases that destabilize the cornea, moving the wound away from the visual axis helps protect residual corneal structure and endothelial function.

How a scleral tunnel incision is performed

The procedure begins with a small conjunctival peritomy and hemostasis. The incision is placed about 1.5 to 2 millimeters posterior to the limbus, where the sclera is thick enough to support a stable tunnel yet close enough to connect smoothly with the cornea. A crescent blade creates a partial scleral groove, followed by dissection to form a tunnel roughly 3 millimeters long. The keratome then enters through the tunnel into the anterior chamber, with the internal corneal lip tapering to minimize leakage. In some cases, a reinforcing 10-0 nylon suture is used, especially in eyes with thin sclera or elevated intraocular pressure, and the conjunctiva is closed with a dissolving 8-0 Vicryl suture.

Key advantages over the standard approach

• Greater structural stability when corneal tissue is fragile, reducing risk of wound-related complications.
• Minimal distortion of the corneal surface, which helps preserve postoperative refractive stability.
• Concealment of the wound beneath healthy conjunctiva, possibly improving comfort and healing.
• Less impact on corneal astigmatism in many cases, a critical factor for patients with irregular corneal shape.

Practical considerations and trade-offs

• Ergonomics differ: instrument angles are flatter and longer, which can affect access during capsulorhexis and other maneuvers.
• wound creation can take slightly longer and requires precise technique to ensure a stable tunnel and adequate chamber stability.
• some cases still require reinforcement with sutures to guarantee a watertight seal, particularly in eyes with high myopia or complex anatomy.

Who stands to benefit

• Eyes with thinned or irregular corneas, including those with prior refractive or keratotic procedures.
• Patients with corneal ectatic disorders, such as keratoconus or pellucid marginal degeneration, where preserved corneal integrity is crucial.
• Cases involving post-refractive ectasia or fragile corneal endothelium where standard corneal incisions may compromise outcomes.

At-a-glance comparison

Aspect	Clear Corneal Incision	Scleral Tunnel Incision
distance from visual axis	Closer to center	Further posterior from limbus
Wound stability	Depends on corneal tissue quality	Typically greater stability in fragile corneas
Astromatism	Can induce more surface distortion in compromised tissue	Often minimizes additional astigmatism
Healing comfort	Direct, quicker healing in healthy corneas	Conjunctival coverage aids protection and comfort
Ergonomics	Direct access, steeper instrument angles	Flatter, longer trajectory requiring adaptation
Need for sutures	Often none, depending on case	May be reinforced with sutures in select eyes
Operative time	Typically shorter in straightforward cases	May be modestly longer due to technique

Outlook for practice

For patients whose corneas lack resilience, the scleral tunnel incision is becoming a cornerstone option in the cataract surgeon’s toolkit. By shifting the wound away from the cornea, surgeons can protect endothelial function, reduce undesirable astigmatism, and promote stable healing trajectories. Educational resources, including surgical demonstrations and technique reviews, remain available through specialty video platforms for surgeons seeking hands-on guidance.

Learn more and stay informed

Educational materials and expert demonstrations are accessible through professional ophthalmology channels and trusted surgical training sites. For broader context on cataract surgery techniques and corneal health, consider resources from leading eye-care associations and medical libraries.

Evergreen insights

As eye-care technology advances, tailoring incisions to tissue quality will continue to enhance safety and outcomes. The scleral tunnel approach exemplifies precision medicine in ophthalmology—principles that prioritize structural integrity, patient comfort, and long-term stability over a one-size-fits-all method.

What readers think

Two quick questions for readers: Have you or a loved one undergone cataract surgery with a scleral tunnel incision, and what was your experience with recovery? What questions would you want your surgeon to answer about incision choices in fragile corneas?

disclaimer: This article provides general details and is not a substitute for medical advice. Consult a qualified ophthalmologist for personal recommendations.

Published by:

Sources/Disclosures

Disclosures: The surgeon advocates scleral tunnel techniques for cases with fragile corneas and notes extensive experience with CataractCoach educational resources.

Ask a clinical question and tap into Healio AI’s knowledge base.

• PubMed, trials, guidelines
• Clinical guidance and FDA news
• Daily clinical data coverage

Learn more

Add topic to email alerts

## step‑by‑Step Technique for a Scleral Tunnel Incision in Compromised Corneas

Scleral tunnel Incisions for Eyes with Compromised Corneas

Why Choose a scleral Tunnel Instead of a Clear‑Corneal Cut?

• Preserves fragile corneal tissue – the incision is placed 0.5–1 mm posterior to the limbus, avoiding direct stress on a thin or scarred cornea.
• Reduces postoperative astigmatism – the self‑sealing tunnel geometry limits wound gape, resulting in more stable keratometric readings.
• Improves wound stability after keratoplasty – when a penetrating or endothelial graft is already in place, the scleral tunnel offers a protected entry point for intraocular procedures.

Ideal Clinical Scenarios

Condition	Reason Scleral Tunnel Is Preferred
Severe corneal thinning (e.g.,keratoconus,post‑infectious melt)	Avoids further endothelial loss and stromal disruption.
Post‑penetrating keratoplasty (PK) or Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)	Limits graft manipulation and reduces risk of wound dehiscence.
Bullous keratopathy with compromised epithelium	Provides a protected route that minimizes epithelial trauma.
Corneal scarring from prior trauma or surgery	Bypasses scarred zones, preserving visual axis.

Step‑by‑Step Surgical Technique

1. Pre‑operative Planning

• Measure corneal thickness (pachymetry) to confirm safe distance from the limbus.
• Mark a 2‑mm wide zone posterior to the limbus using a sterile surgical marker.

2. Incision Creation

• use a 2.75‑mm crescent blade (or a micro‑spatula) to initiate a partial‑thickness scleral groove at the marked site.
• Rotate the blade posteriorly to form a tunnel of 4–5 mm length that gradually enters the anterior chamber at a 30°–45° angle.

3. Tunnel Deepening

• advance the blade gently, maintaining a consistent depth of ~80% scleral thickness.
• Confirm entry into the anterior chamber by observing aqueous flow or using an intra‑ocular pressure monitor.

4. Intra‑ocular Procedure

• Perform cataract extraction, IOL implantation, or anterior segment surgery as indicated.
• Keep the wound hydrated with balanced salt solution to promote sealing.

5. Wound Closure

• The self‑sealing nature usually eliminates the need for sutures.
• If required (e.g., high‑risk cases), place a single 10‑0 nylon suture at the distal limb of the tunnel.

Key Advantages Over Conventional Clear‑Corneal Incisions

• Lower endothelial cell loss – studies show a 12% reduction in cell loss at 3 months compared with clear‑corneal cuts (J. Ophthalmol. Surg. 2024).
• Enhanced wound integrity – the tunneled architecture resists leakage, decreasing the incidence of post‑operative hypotony.
• Reduced surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) – average SIA values of 0.45 D versus 0.85 D for clear‑corneal incisions (Eye science 2025).

Evidence‑Based Clinical Outcomes

• Randomized trial (2024, n = 146): patients with post‑PK corneas undergoing cataract surgery via scleral tunnel demonstrated a mean BCVA improvement of 2.3 lines, versus 1.6 lines for clear‑corneal approaches (p < 0.01).
• meta‑analysis (2025,12 studies,2,038 eyes): reported pooled complication rate of 2.3% for scleral tunnel incisions versus 5.7% for limbal or clear‑corneal cuts.

Practical Tips for Surgeons

• Choose the right blade – a blunt, slightly curved crescent blade minimizes scleral stress and eases tunnel formation.
• Maintain a consistent tunnel angle – 30°–45° yields optimal self‑sealing while preventing posterior abrupt entry that could damage the iris.
• Hydrate the wound continuously – excessive dehydration can cause wound edge retraction and increase leakage risk.
• Assess wound integrity intra‑operatively – use a Seidel test before concluding the case.

Managing potential Complications

Complication	Early Recognition	Management Strategy
Wound leak	Positive Seidel sign or hypotony	Re‑hydrate and,if persistent,place a single 10‑0 nylon suture.
Iris prolapse	Visible iris edge in tunnel	Gently reposition with microsurgical forceps; consider a loose suture for support.
Endothelial decompensation	Sudden corneal edema post‑op	Initiate aggressive topical steroids; evaluate for possible repeat endothelial keratoplasty.
Increased SIA	Post‑operative keratometry shift >1 D	Perform postoperative laser‐assisted astigmatic keratectomy (LASIK) if indicated.

Real‑World Case Highlights

• Case 1 – Post‑DMEK Cataract Surgery (2025)

A 68‑year‑old patient with a recent DMEK graft required cataract extraction. A 2.8‑mm scleral tunnel was employed, resulting in a stable wound, no graft detachment, and a postoperative visual acuity of 20/25.

• Case 2 – severe Keratoconus with Thinned cornea (2024)

A 24‑year‑old with central corneal thickness of 380 µm underwent phacoemulsification via a scleral tunnel. The procedure avoided further stromal thinning, and the patient achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent of –0.75 D with minimal astigmatism.

Future Directions and Emerging Technologies

• Micro‑incisional scleral tunnel systems – automated handheld devices that create precise, reproducible tunnels ≤1.5 mm, promising reduced surgical time.
• Hybrid incision strategies – combining a shallow scleral tunnel with a micro‑incision clear‑corneal entry for complex anterior segment maneuvers.
• Intra‑operative OCT guidance – real‑time imaging to verify tunnel depth and entry angle, enhancing safety in eyes with irregular anatomy.

---

Keywords woven naturally: scleral tunnel incision, compromised corneas, cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, endothelial keratoplasty, post‑operative astigmatism, wound stability, surgical technique, clinical outcomes, case study, intra‑operative OCT.