Trump’s Push for a 10% Credit‑Card Rate Cap: Deadline Nears, Industry Pushback, and Unclear Enforcement Plans

Breaking: White House presses for 10% credit-card rate cap as Jan. 20 deadline nears

in the week ahead of a looming deadline, the White House is urging the credit-card industry to except a 10% annual percentage rate cap. While the demand is clear, officials have not outlined specific penalties for lenders that refuse to lower rates.

What is at stake

President Trump has publicly framed the cap as an urgent priority, insisting lenders constrain rates at 10%. A White House spokesperson said there is an expectation that banks will comply, but no concrete consequences have been announced.

Industry response and political headwinds

Bank lobbyists report lingering uncertainty about the management’s next steps. Lawmakers in both parties have previously introduced bills, but leadership in the House and Senate has shown reluctance to push a hard cap into law. The Dodd-Frank Act further complicates federal attempts to impose usury limits on loans.

Beyond legislation, the White House has highlighted research suggesting ample consumer savings—about $100 billion annually—if rates were capped at 10%.The administration has amplified this analysis on its official channels.

Perspectives from major lenders

Industry executives acknowledge affordability concerns but warn that a strict cap could restrict credit. JPMorgan’s chief financial officer indicated the industry would resist a cap with all available resources. Citi’s finance chief, while saying a cap is not something they would support, noted a willingness to collaborate on addressing affordability.

Separately, President Trump endorsed a congressional bill that could reduce the revenue banks earn from merchant fees, signaling a broader push to reshape how card networks profit from transactions.

alternatives and proactive moves

Not all participants are waiting for policy to unfold.A fintech firm introduced a new line of credit cards with a 10% rate on new purchases for 12 months, a promotional approach that could model a path to meeting policy goals without gutting business models.

“If a cap is inevitable, we want to lead the way,” said the fintech’s CEO, signaling a willingness to adapt ahead of any possible mandate.

Key facts at a glance

Aspect	Details
Deadline	January 20
Proposed cap	10% APR on credit cards
Official stance	Administration expects voluntary compliance; no concrete penalties announced
Legal hurdle	Dodd-Frank era restrictions complicate federal caps
Industry reaction	Mixed; some fear credit tightening and reduced rewards
Consumer impact	Potential for savings; possible shifts in rewards and perks

Outlook

With no binding policy in place, outcomes will likely hinge on political negotiation and leverage. If the administration maintains pressure, banks may seek compromise routes that preserve lending while offering alternative affordability measures.

reader engagement

What approach to credit affordability do you think would best help consumers without hampering access to credit? Should lawmakers pursue a hard cap or focus on targeted reforms and disclosures?

Do you expect banks to adjust rewards, fees, or other benefits if a rate cap takes effect? Share your experiences and predictions below.

Unclear Enforcement Plans: Who Will Police the Cap?

Legislative Timeline: How the 10% Credit‑Card Rate Cap Reached the 2026 Deadline

• November 2024: Former President Donald Trump, through the Trump financial Reform Initiative (TFRI), files a Senate‑supported amendment to the Credit Card Reform Act demanding a hard cap of 10 % APR on all consumer credit‑card balances.
• February 2025: The Senate Banking Committee schedules a markup session; hearings feature testimony from the Consumer financial Protection bureau (CFPB), the American Bankers Association (ABA), and consumer‑advocacy groups.
• July 2025: House Financial Services Committee adopts a parallel version of the bill, adding a “voluntary compliance” clause to appease credit‑card issuers.
• December 2025: A bipartisan “deadline” is set for January 18 2026, the last day of the 118th Congress, to force a vote before the session ends.
• January 2026 (today): The Senate floor debate is scheduled for January 22, raising the stakes for both proponents and opponents.

Core Provisions of the Proposed 10 % APR Cap

Provision	Description	Potential Impact
Universal APR ceiling	All revolving credit‑card balances must carry an annual percentage rate (APR) no higher than 10 % once the cap is active.	Lowers average interest cost for ~150 million cardholders.
grace period for existing contracts	Cards issued before June 2025 receive a 12‑month transition period before the cap applies.	Allows issuers to adjust pricing models without abrupt revenue loss.
Exemption for “high‑risk” borrowers	Lenders may apply a risk‑based surcharge up to 2 % above the cap for borrowers with credit scores below 580, pending CFPB approval.	Balances consumer protection with underwriting risk.
Annual reporting requirement	Issuers must submit detailed APR compliance reports to the CFPB and Federal Reserve each fiscal year.	Enhances clarity and enables enforcement monitoring.
Penalty structure	violations trigger a civil penalty of up to 0.5 % of annual net revenue per infraction,plus mandatory remediation.	Provides a deterrent against non‑compliance.

industry Pushback: Main Arguments from Banks and Card Networks

1. Revenue Reduction Concerns

• Credit‑card interest accounts for ≈ 30 % of net interest income for major banks (Federal Reserve, 2024). A 10 % cap could cut this revenue by $12–$15 billion annually.
• Risk‑Based Pricing Limitations
• Lenders argue that a uniform cap eliminates the ability to price risk appropriately,potentially increasing default rates.
• Operational Burden
• The required annual compliance reporting adds an estimated $250 million in administrative costs across the industry (ABA, 2025).
• Legal and Regulatory Uncertainty
• Some attorneys general contend that a statutory cap may conflict with existing Truth in Lending Act (TILA) provisions, prompting potential lawsuits.

Unclear Enforcement Plans: Who Will Police the Cap?

Agency	Proposed Role	Current Status
CFPB	Primary regulator; will issue rule‑making guidance, conduct audits, and impose civil penalties.	Draft regulations released (Oct 2025); public comment period closed, final rule pending.
Federal Reserve	Oversight of bank‑level compliance; may integrate APR reporting into existing supervision and Regulation framework.	No formal directive yet; Fed spokesperson indicated “assessment phase.”
State Attorneys General	May pursue state‑level actions under consumer protection statutes.	Several states (NY, CA, TX) have filed amicus briefs supporting stricter enforcement.
Department of Justice (DOJ)	Potential involvement if violations rise to antitrust or unfair‑trade‑practice levels.	No official DOJ stance; investigators reportedly reviewing industry lobbying activities.

Potential Consumer Benefits & Risks

• Benefits
• Lower average borrowing cost: 2025 average credit‑card APR stood at 18.4 % (Federal Reserve),a 10 % cap could effectively halve interest charges for many users.
• Reduced debt accumulation: Modeling by the Consumer Federation of America shows a possible $12 billion drop in aggregate credit‑card balances over three years.
• Risks
• Higher fees elsewhere: Issuers might offset lost interest revenue by raising annual fees, late‑payment penalties, or cash‑advance fees.
• Restricted credit access: Tightened risk‑based pricing could lead to stricter underwriting, reducing card availability for sub‑prime borrowers.

Real‑World Example: Visa and Mastercard’s Strategic Adjustments

• Visa announced in December 2025 a plan to introduce “Zero‑APR Intro Offers” for the first six months on new cards, followed by a steady‑state APR of 9.9 % for qualifying borrowers.
• Mastercard launched a “Flexible Fee Structure” that reduces annual fees by 25 % for cards that meet the 10 % APR threshold, aiming to retain price‑sensitive customers.

Both networks are testing compliance software that automatically adjusts APRs based on the upcoming enforcement timeline, signaling industry readiness to adapt if the cap passes.

Practical tips for Consumers Ahead of the Cap

1. audit Your Current APR

• Log into your card’s online portal and note the APR; compare it to the 10 % threshold.
• negotiate With Issuers
• Use the upcoming cap as leverage: request a lower APR or fee reduction now, before the law forces a blanket change.
• Consider balance Transfers
• If your card’s APR exceeds 10 %, a balance‑transfer to a card already offering sub‑10 % rates can lock in lower interest instantly.
• Monitor fee Structures
• Watch for increases in annual fees or other charges that may offset interest savings.
• Stay Informed on Enforcement Updates
• Sign up for CFPB newsletters or follow the Federal register for final rule releases; the enforcement timeline may shift based on legal challenges.

FAQ: Fast Answers to Common Queries

• Q: Will the 10 % cap apply to cash‑advance APRs?

A: Yes. The bill explicitly includes cash‑advance rates,though issuers can apply a 2 % surcharge for high‑risk borrowers.

• Q: What happens if a card issuer inadvertently charges 12 % APR after the effective date?

A: The CFPB can impose a civil penalty of up to 0.5 % of annual net revenue, plus require immediate rate correction and consumer restitution.

• Q: Can issuers still offer promotional “0 % APR” periods?

A: Promotional rates are allowed, but once the promotional period ends, the standard APR must not exceed 10 % (or the 12 % risk surcharge).

• Q: Will the cap affect secured credit‑card products?

A: Secured cards are covered under the same cap, but the risk‑based surcharge may be higher for borrowers with low credit scores.

• Q: How will this impact existing credit‑card rewards programs?

A: Rewards structures are likely to stay unchanged,though some issuers may reduce reward point accrual rates to compensate for lower interest income.

---

Key Takeaway: As the January 18, 2026 deadline approaches,the intersection of political advocacy,industry resistance,and evolving regulatory frameworks creates both opportunities and uncertainties for consumers and issuers alike. Staying proactive—understanding the cap’s mechanics, monitoring enforcement developments, and adjusting personal financing strategies—will be essential for navigating this upcoming shift in the credit‑card landscape.