Home » News » About 50,000 signatures ask the Government to prevent Juana Rivas from “the youngest son” be delivered to his abuser father “

About 50,000 signatures ask the Government to prevent Juana Rivas from “the youngest son” be delivered to his abuser father “

Urgent: Spain Grapples with Child Protection Case as 50,000 Demand Boy’s Safety

Granada, Spain – A wave of public outcry is building in Spain as authorities prepare to potentially return 11-year-old Daniel Rivas to Italy with his father, Francesco Arcuri, who is facing trial on charges of alleged physical and psychological abuse. Over 50,000 signatures were delivered Monday to the Ministry of Justice, a powerful demonstration of public concern and a desperate attempt to intervene in a case that has ignited a national debate about child welfare and international custody disputes. This is a breaking news story with significant implications for family law and the protection of vulnerable children.

The Plea for Daniel: A Child’s Voice Silenced?

Daniel’s own voice is at the heart of this crisis. According to documents accompanying the petition, the boy has expressed a clear and unwavering desire to remain with his mother, Juana Rivas, fearing his father. “I don’t want Francesco Arcuri,” the text states, detailing allegations of seven years of abuse, including death threats. The petition, launched on Change.org on July 17th, specifically requests that Minister of Justice Félix Bolaños and Minister of Childhood Sira Rego “immediately suspend” the delivery and the application of Article 39 of European Regulation, which governs cross-border custody cases. This article allows for the blocking of a child’s return if it’s deemed to be against their best interests.

Symbolic Support: Voices of Trauma and Loss

The delivery of the signatures was a deeply emotional event, led by Itziar Prats, the mother of two girls tragically killed by her ex-partner in 2018, and Antonio Miguel Gálvez Villalobos, a survivor of abuse at the hands of his father. Their presence wasn’t accidental. Petition organizers intended to highlight what they see as systemic failures within the Spanish judicial system to adequately protect children from gender-based violence. Villalobos’s testimony as a witness in a previous case was reportedly dismissed, a fact organizers say underscores a pattern of ignoring the voices of young victims. Prats’s involvement serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences when protection requests are ignored – a failure the Spanish State itself acknowledged in her case.

The Legal Battle and Growing Opposition

The case hinges on the interpretation of international law and the assessment of Daniel’s best interests. Women’s organizations across Spain have united in urging the Prosecutor’s Office of Granada to halt the return, citing the pending abuse allegations against Arcuri in Italy. A joint statement from organizations including Fundación Mujer, Association of Women Juristas Themis, and the Spanish Federation of Breast Cancer, emphasizes that the decision appears to disregard Daniel’s explicit wishes. Letters directly from Daniel and his brother Gabriel have also been sent to authorities, pleading for intervention. This situation highlights the complexities of international child custody disputes, where differing legal systems and interpretations can create significant challenges.

Understanding Article 39 and the European Framework

Article 39 of European Regulation 2201/2003 (Brussels II bis) is a crucial element in this case. It allows a court to refuse to return a child to their country of habitual residence if doing so would expose them to a grave risk of harm. However, applying this article is often a delicate balancing act, requiring careful consideration of all evidence and a thorough assessment of the child’s welfare. The Spanish court’s decision to proceed with the return despite the allegations and Daniel’s expressed fears has fueled the current controversy. SEO optimization for searches related to “European Regulation 39” and “child custody disputes” is vital for readers seeking information on this topic.

The clock is ticking. As organizers stated, the decision regarding Daniel’s fate is scheduled for Tuesday at 10 am. The outcome will not only determine the immediate future of one young boy but could also set a precedent for how Spain handles similar cases involving allegations of abuse and the rights of children in international custody battles. This is a developing story that Archyde will continue to follow closely, providing updates as they become available. For more in-depth coverage of family law and child protection issues, explore our dedicated sections on Archyde.com.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.