Home » Entertainment » Adam Woods about Rasmus Gozzis and Miss Snusk’s let reset

Adam Woods about Rasmus Gozzis and Miss Snusk’s let reset

Adam Woods Alleges Credit Omission on Rasmus Gozzi & Miss Snusk’s New Track “Reset” – A Swedish Music Dispute

Stockholm, Sweden – October 10, 2025 – A brewing controversy is unfolding in the Swedish music scene as artist Adam Woods publicly claims he was denied credit for his contributions to “Reset,” the newly released song by producer Rasmus Gozzi featuring Miss Snusk. The dispute, revealed via a TikTok video posted late Thursday, centers around claims of uncredited songwriting and arrangement work. This is a developing story, and archyde.com is following it closely for updates. This is a crucial moment for understanding artist rights in the age of rapid music releases and social media speculation – a topic increasingly relevant for Google News indexing.

The Claim: A Song Originally “Ours”

According to Woods, who competed in Melodifestivalen 2004 with the song “Supernatural,” he and Felicia (known as Miss Snusk) were originally slated to release “Reset.” He asserts he significantly contributed to the song’s development, including rewriting lyrics and altering arrangements. “Rasmus Gozzi has now released the song I would release with Felicia, former Miss Snusk, without my approval,” Woods stated in his TikTok video, which quickly gained traction among fans. He explained that the song had been widely perceived as “ours” due to planned performances at his release party, adding to the confusion caused by the new release.

What’s at Stake: Credit, Copyright, and Collaboration

The core of the issue revolves around crediting for musical contributions. While Woods acknowledges he didn’t write the original song, he insists his production work and lyrical changes warrant recognition. “Text and arrangements I should technically have cred for, but I choose to believe that they did not use it consciously,” he commented. This situation highlights a common challenge in the music industry: navigating the complexities of collaboration and ensuring all contributors receive appropriate acknowledgement. Understanding SEO best practices for music-related content is vital for artists seeking to protect their work and reputation online.

Gozzi Responds: A “Misunderstanding”

Rasmus Gozzi, reached by Expressen, dismissed the claims as a “misunderstanding.” He stated he spoke with Woods and explained that the original songwriters preferred he take on the project after Woods declined. Gozzi further asserted that no deliberate attempt was made to exclude Woods, and that the final version reverted to the original songwriters’ vision. This response underscores the importance of clear communication and documented agreements in collaborative music projects. It also raises questions about the ownership of altered versions of existing songs – a legal grey area that often requires expert mediation.

Beyond the Headlines: The Evolving Landscape of Music Credit

This incident isn’t isolated. The rise of digital music production and collaborative platforms has created new challenges for establishing clear ownership and crediting. Artists are increasingly relying on social media to address disputes and protect their intellectual property. The speed of release cycles, often driven by platforms like Spotify and TikTok, can exacerbate these issues, leaving less time for careful negotiation and documentation. For aspiring musicians, understanding copyright law and utilizing written agreements are more crucial than ever. Consider exploring resources from organizations like the Swedish Performing Rights Society (STIM) for guidance on protecting your musical creations. This is a breaking news story with lasting implications for the music industry.

Ultimately, Woods seems less concerned with a full-blown conflict than with clarifying his non-involvement in the current release. “It doesn’t affect me. I hadn’t wanted to release the song anyway, the video I did to explain to those who have already heard the song when it was ‘our’ that I am not part of the new one,” he told Expressen. The situation serves as a reminder that even in the fast-paced world of music, transparency and respect for creative contributions remain paramount.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.