Breaking: Lawyer Suspended After Shoe-Throwing Attempt at Chief Justice of India – Contempt Proceedings Loom
New Delhi – A shocking incident unfolded within the Supreme Court of India on Monday, as lawyer Rakesh Kishore allegedly attempted to throw a shoe at Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai. The act, accompanied by shouts of “Sanatan ka apman nahi sahenge” (We will not tolerate disrespect to Sanatan Dharma), has triggered swift condemnation and a request for criminal contempt proceedings. This is a developing breaking news story, and Archyde.com is providing live updates.
Chaos in the Courtroom & Immediate Suspension
According to reports, the incident occurred in a packed courtroom, disrupting proceedings and causing immediate alarm among lawyers, litigants, and court staff. Kishore’s actions prompted an immediate response from the Bar Council of India, which swiftly suspended his license to practice law. The gravity of the situation underscores the sanctity of the judicial process and the importance of maintaining decorum within the courts.
The attempted act wasn’t merely a physical disruption; it was a direct challenge to the authority of the Supreme Court. The phrase “Sanatan ka apman nahi sahenge” suggests a connection to recent controversies surrounding remarks perceived as disrespectful towards the Sanatan Dharma faith, adding a layer of socio-political context to the incident.
Contempt of Court: The Legal Battle Ahead
Advocate Subhash Chandran K R has formally requested Attorney General R Venkataramani’s consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Kishore, citing Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. This section mandates the Attorney General’s approval for pursuing contempt charges against individuals who aren’t directly within the purview of the Supreme Court or High Courts.
The plea argues that Kishore’s actions constituted “gross interference with the administration of justice” and a “deliberate attempt to undermine the dignity of the Supreme Court.” Contempt of court isn’t about silencing dissent; it’s about protecting the judiciary’s ability to function independently and impartially. It’s a cornerstone of the rule of law, ensuring that judgments are respected and the legal system isn’t subjected to undue pressure or intimidation.
Beyond the Act: A Pattern of Disregard?
The request for contempt proceedings isn’t solely based on the courtroom incident. The letter to the Attorney General also highlights Kishore’s alleged disparaging remarks about the Chief Justice made during subsequent media interactions. Crucially, he reportedly justified his actions rather than expressing remorse, a factor the advocate argues demonstrates a clear intention to “scandalise the court and erode public confidence in the judiciary.” This lack of contrition is a significant factor in the contempt proceedings request.
A Second Contempt Request: Incitement Allegations
This incident isn’t occurring in a vacuum. The Attorney General has also received a separate request for contempt proceedings against religious orator Aniruddhacharya alias Aniruddh Ram Tiwari and YouTuber Ajeet Bharati. Mission Ambedkar founder alleges they incited the attempted attack on the CJI. This suggests a broader concern about potentially inflammatory rhetoric and its impact on the judiciary. The potential link between online incitement and real-world actions is a growing area of concern for legal systems worldwide.
SEO Tip: Understanding the legal framework surrounding contempt of court is crucial. The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, aims to safeguard judicial authority, but its application is often debated. For more information on this topic, explore resources from the Ministry of Law and Justice and reputable legal news outlets.
The unfolding situation raises critical questions about the balance between freedom of speech and the need to protect the integrity of the judicial system. As the Attorney General considers the requests for contempt proceedings, the nation watches closely, recognizing the profound implications for the future of justice in India. Stay tuned to Archyde.com for the latest updates on this Google News-worthy story and for in-depth analysis of the legal and societal ramifications.
