The AFL’s recent rule changes regarding the interchange bench are already having a noticeable impact on team strategies, with early data suggesting veterans and power players are poised to benefit. Clubs spent the summer debating how to utilize the expanded bench – a fifth player now available without reducing overall interchange rotations – and the initial approach has largely involved maximizing the impact of experienced players and those with explosive capabilities. This shift in strategy is reshaping how coaches manage game time and player workloads, potentially extending the careers of key figures and adding a novel dimension to on-field dynamics.
The move away from the traditional substitute player has prompted a “retro” approach, according to analysis of the opening rounds. Instead of rotating players frequently, many teams are opting to keep key defenders on the field for the entirety of the match, freeing up rotations for their more dynamic midfielders. This tactical adjustment is designed to preserve energy and maximize the effectiveness of star players, particularly those who may be managing injuries or nearing the conclude of their careers. The expanded bench allows for a more nuanced approach to player management, offering coaches greater flexibility in deploying their personnel.
Key Players Benefit from New Bench Rules
Several players have already seen the benefits of this new system. Billy Frampton, Callum Wilkie, Rory Lobb, and Connor Idun all played a full 100 per cent of game time in recent matches, demonstrating the trend of keeping key defenders on the field for extended periods. Conversely, Hawthorn strategically limited Finn Maginness’s game time to 56 per cent, while the Western Bulldogs kept young Jordan Croft off the ground for the final quarter, with his overall game time at just 46 per cent – though the reason for this limited involvement remains uncertain, potentially related to form or fitness.
The change particularly favors players like Collingwood’s Scott Pendlebury and Jordan De Goey. Pendlebury, a seasoned veteran, can be strategically deployed during periods when the game’s intensity subsides, allowing him to contribute his experience and skill without being overly taxed. De Goey, known for his explosive power, can be utilized in short, impactful bursts, maximizing his effectiveness while minimizing the risk of fatigue. This approach allows coaches to leverage the strengths of these players while mitigating their weaknesses.
Adapting to Rule Changes and Increased Throw-Ins
The adaptation to the expanded bench hasn’t been limited to player deployment. Teams have also quickly adjusted to the new rule regarding last disposal out of bounds, which now results in a free kick between the arcs without umpire discretion. This has led to a clearer and more straightforward application of the rule, reducing ambiguity and controversy.
Interestingly, despite the new disposal rule, there has been a slight increase in the average number of throw-ins this season, rising from 34.1 to 37.4. However, the changes to the ruck rules have significantly reduced the number of ball-ups, dropping from an average of 36 per game last year to just 22 in the opening round. This suggests a shift in the dynamics of stoppages, with fewer contested ball-ups and more throw-ins.
The expanded bench also provides opportunities for players returning from or managing injuries. Players like Sydney’s Tom Papley can be strategically used in short bursts, allowing them to contribute without being overextended. Similarly, veteran players like Patrick Dangerfield, who possess both experience and explosive power, can be integrated into the team in a manner similar to Pendlebury and De Goey, maximizing their impact.
The early stages of the season indicate that the expanded bench is proving to be a subtle yet profound change to the AFL landscape. Coaches are adapting their strategies to capitalize on the increased flexibility, and players are responding accordingly. The focus on maximizing the impact of key players, particularly veterans and those with specific skill sets, is likely to continue as the season progresses.
As teams continue to refine their approaches to the expanded bench, it will be crucial to monitor how these changes affect game outcomes and player performance. The ability to effectively manage player workloads and strategically deploy personnel will be a key factor in determining success in the coming months. What remains to be seen is whether this trend will continue throughout the season and how other teams will adapt their strategies in response.
What are your thoughts on the expanded bench? Share your opinions in the comments below, and don’t forget to share this article with fellow AFL fans!
