Is Aroldis Chapman’s Dominance a Sign of a Reliever Revolution?
For nearly a month, batters haven’t been able to crack Aroldis Chapman. It’s a stretch of dominance so profound it’s prompting a question few thought to ask: could a closer actually win the Cy Young Award? While historically improbable, Chapman’s current form, coupled with evolving baseball strategy, begs a deeper look at the changing value – and potential recognition – of elite relief pitching.
The Historical Hurdle: Why Relievers Rarely Win Cy Youngs
The Cy Young Award, traditionally, has been a celebration of starting pitching endurance and volume. Nine relievers have won the award in MLB history, a tiny fraction compared to the hundreds of starters honored. Éric Gagné’s 2003 season – a perfect 55-for-55 in save opportunities – remains the gold standard, a level of sustained perfection rarely seen. As the original article points out, Chapman’s 26 saves with two blown saves this season, while excellent, don’t immediately place him in that rarefied air. The narrative around the award heavily favors pitchers who log significant innings and demonstrate consistent, high-level performance over a larger sample size.
The Shifting Landscape: The Rise of the High-Leverage Arm
However, baseball is evolving. The emphasis on maximizing matchups and leveraging specialized arms is reshaping the game. Teams are increasingly willing to deploy their best relievers in the highest-leverage situations, often for multiple innings. This increased importance of the closer role, and the broader bullpen, is changing the calculus. A dominant closer isn’t just finishing games; they’re actively shortening them and significantly impacting win probability. This shift is reflected in the increasing investment teams are making in bullpen talent, recognizing their crucial role in postseason success.
Chapman’s Case: Beyond Saves and Into Advanced Metrics
Aroldis Chapman’s recent streak isn’t just about avoiding hits; it’s about the way he’s avoiding them. His velocity remains elite, and his command has been exceptional. But to truly assess his Cy Young potential, we need to look beyond traditional stats. Advanced metrics like FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching), WHIP (Walks plus Hits per Inning Pitched), and wRC+ (Weighted Runs Created Plus) paint a more complete picture. These metrics isolate a pitcher’s performance from defensive factors and ballpark effects, providing a more accurate measure of their true skill. If Chapman continues to maintain elite numbers in these categories, the conversation will inevitably shift.
The Competition: Crochet and Beyond
Chapman isn’t operating in a vacuum. As the original article notes, teammate Garrett Crochet is also a strong contender. The American League is brimming with talented relievers, making the path to a Cy Young even more challenging. However, the presence of multiple deserving candidates could actually increase the likelihood of a reliever winning, as it forces voters to seriously consider the value of dominant bullpen arms. The debate itself elevates the position’s profile.
Looking Ahead: Will We See Another Reliever Cy Young Winner?
While Chapman’s current streak is remarkable, sustained dominance is key. He needs to continue shutting down opposing hitters, and the narrative needs to build momentum. The media’s attention, as the original article suggests, is crucial. But more broadly, the future of the Cy Young Award may well depend on how baseball continues to value relief pitching. If the trend towards specialized bullpens and high-leverage arms continues, we’re likely to see more relievers enter the Cy Young conversation – and perhaps even take home the award. The game is changing, and the Cy Young might need to change with it. The question isn’t just whether Chapman can win, but whether the award will finally recognize the immense impact of a dominant closer.
Fangraphs provides in-depth baseball statistics and analysis.
What are your thoughts? Is Aroldis Chapman a legitimate Cy Young contender, or is the award still firmly in the realm of starting pitchers? Share your opinions in the comments below!
