The social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, has become a focal point in examining the online activities of far-right groups and individuals. Recent reports detail the sharing of provocative imagery and the display of potentially illegal symbols by individuals linked to the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), raising questions about online radicalization and the spread of extremist content. The case highlights the challenges platforms face in moderating content and addressing the presence of extremist ideologies online.
In late March 2022, an individual from Upper Austria repeatedly posted the same photograph on an account on X. The image depicted thirteen young men, nine of whom were performing what appeared to be a Hitler salute. This act, illegal under Austrian law, quickly drew attention and sparked investigations into the individuals involved and their potential connections to extremist groups. The incident underscores the ongoing concern about the resurgence of far-right ideologies and their propagation through digital channels.
Investigation and Identifications
The photograph quickly circulated online, prompting scrutiny from both media outlets and authorities. Investigations revealed that the individual who posted the image was associated with the FPÖ, a right-wing populist party in Austria. Further examination of the account revealed a pattern of sharing content containing extremist symbols and rhetoric, including references to the “Dauergeile Barbaren” – a phrase associated with a far-right online community known for its misogynistic and nationalistic views. The term itself, meaning “permanently horny barbarians,” is used to glorify a hypermasculine, aggressive, and anti-immigrant ideology.
X Corp.’s Ownership and Content Moderation
The incident occurred after Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, which was subsequently rebranded as X in July 2023. Since the takeover in October 2022, X Corp., now a wholly owned subsidiary of X Holdings Corp. Controlled by Musk, has undergone significant changes in its content moderation policies. These changes have been criticized by some as leading to a more permissive environment for extremist content, while others argue they are aimed at promoting free speech. According to Britannica, X is now one of the most visited online platforms in the world, with 229 million daily active users as of 2022 [Wikipedia].
Legal Ramifications and Austrian Law
The display of Nazi symbols and the performance of the Hitler salute are illegal in Austria, punishable by imprisonment under the country’s Prohibition Act. The investigation into the individuals depicted in the photograph focused on determining whether their actions constituted a violation of this law. Authorities are examining the context of the image and the intent of those involved to assess whether criminal charges are warranted. The case highlights the challenges of enforcing laws against hate speech and extremist symbols in the online realm, where content can be easily disseminated across borders.
The “Dauergeile Barbaren” Network
The “Dauergeile Barbaren” network, identified through the content shared on the X account, represents a growing trend of online radicalization. This community, active on various social media platforms, promotes a particularly virulent strain of far-right ideology characterized by misogyny, xenophobia, and a glorification of violence. The network’s apply of coded language and memes allows it to evade detection by content moderation systems and spread its message to a wider audience. The incident on X brought increased attention to this network and its activities.
The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk in 2022, for $44 billion, led to significant changes within the company, including layoffs and alterations to content monitoring policies [Yahoo News]. In March 2025, X Corp. Was acquired by Musk’s AI firm, X.AI [Wikipedia].
As investigations continue, the case serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance in monitoring online spaces for extremist content and the importance of holding individuals accountable for violating laws against hate speech. The incident also raises broader questions about the responsibility of social media platforms in combating the spread of radical ideologies and protecting users from harmful content. What remains to be seen is how Austrian authorities will proceed with the investigation and whether further action will be taken against those involved, as well as how X will respond to concerns about the presence of extremist content on its platform.
What are your thoughts on the role of social media platforms in combating extremist content? Share your opinions in the comments below.
