Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Kyiv – New allegations of corruption have emerged in Ukraine, implicating individuals close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The accusations, presented to Ukraine’s parliamentary investigative committee on Monday, center on claims of bribery involving former intelligence chief Ivan Bakanov and Andriy Naumov, a former head of the Security Service of Ukraine’s (SBU) internal security department. The developments come as Ukraine continues to navigate the challenges of war and seeks to solidify international support.

Businessman Serhiy Vaganjan testified before the Temporary Investigative Commission of the Verkhovna Rada (Ukraine’s parliament), alleging a scheme where Bakanov and Naumov accepted millions of dollars in bribes. Vaganjan claimed to possess photographic and video evidence supporting his accusations, stating the total sum involved reached “tens of millions of dollars.” The full recording of the hearing is available online here. These allegations add to a growing scrutiny of corruption within Ukraine, a key concern for Western allies providing substantial financial and military aid.

Allegations Detail a System of Bribes

Vaganjan detailed a system where Bakanov and Naumov allegedly exploited Ukraine’s sanctions regime for personal gain, effectively turning it into a “personal business project.” He asserted he paid substantial sums, including profits from grain exports, in exchange for assurances of avoiding regulatory issues. According to Vaganjan, Naumov systematically created obstacles for businesses in the agricultural and healthcare sectors – through inspections and cargo delays – and then demanded millions of dollars to resolve them. He specifically cited a payment of six million hryvnias (approximately €117,000) he was forced to produce to ensure a cargo ship could depart from the port of Odesa without obstruction.

The Ukrainian sanctions regime is a system of state-imposed, non-military restrictions that Ukraine can apply to individuals, companies, or states deemed a threat to its national security, sovereignty, or economy. Vaganjan testified that Bakanov, a long-time friend of Zelenskyy dating back to school, was appointed head of the SBU due to this close relationship. He further claimed Bakanov lacked a deep understanding of the SBU’s operations, with Naumov effectively running the agency. Vaganjan stated Naumov did not directly communicate with the President, instead relaying information through Bakanov, who “handled everything that needed to be reported to the President.”

Claims of Funds Reaching Zelenskyy

Perhaps the most serious allegation made by Vaganjan was the claim that Bakanov subsequently transferred the collected bribes directly to President Zelenskyy. When asked about this possibility, Vaganjan responded affirmatively, stating, “Yes, I think so.” This claim has prompted significant attention from Ukrainian media. TSN, one of Ukraine’s largest television networks, described the testimony as “shocking” according to a report on Wednesday.

Vaganjan also stated that other businesspeople possess evidence corroborating his claims but are currently too intimidated to come forward, alleging that Bakanov and Naumov retain influence within security circles. He initially made these accusations in a YouTube interview with Boryslav Berez, an ex-member of parliament and former spokesperson for the extremist Right Sector group, last month.

Context and Ongoing Investigations

These allegations follow previous reports of corruption concerns within Ukraine. In January 2026, President Zelenskyy warned of a new wave of “massive attacks” on the country’s energy infrastructure, alleging Russia was preparing to exploit freezing temperatures to cripple the power grid as reported by Aktuality.sk. The timing of these new corruption claims, amidst the ongoing conflict with Russia and the need for continued international aid, is particularly sensitive. Ukraine is heavily reliant on financial assistance from Western partners, and concerns about corruption could potentially impact future support.

President Zelenskyy met with Ukrainian skeleton racer Vladyslav Heraskevych and his father, Mykhailo Heraskevych, in Munich on February 15, 2026, according to the official website of the President of Ukraine. This meeting occurred during Zelenskyy’s visit to the Munich Security Conference, where he also met with partners in the Berlin Format and leadership of a Ukrainian-German drone production venture.

The Verkhovna Rada’s investigative commission is expected to continue its investigation into these allegations. The outcome of the investigation and any subsequent legal proceedings will be closely watched by both domestic and international observers. It remains to be seen whether the claims will lead to formal charges or further shakeup within Ukraine’s government.

Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below.

The initial 72 to 96 hours after ceasing substance use can be the most medically dangerous period for individuals struggling with addiction, a reality often overlooked by both those experiencing dependency and their families. Attempting to manage withdrawal symptoms without professional medical supervision can be life-threatening, highlighting the crucial role of medical detox as a foundational step in long-term recovery.

Medical detox isn’t simply about clearing substances from the body; it’s a carefully regulated process designed to stabilize both physical and mental health, preparing individuals for more comprehensive addiction treatment. As the UKAT website explains, detox “clears your system and allows you to start again, substance-free,” but this process requires expert management to ensure safety and minimize discomfort.

The human brain adapts to the repeated use of substances like alcohol, opioids, and benzodiazepines, altering neurochemical pathways. Over time, the brain’s receptors turn into less sensitive, requiring increased amounts of the substance to achieve the same effect. This leads to a reliance where the substance effectively takes over the role of naturally produced feel-good chemicals like dopamine and serotonin. When substance use is abruptly stopped, the nervous system becomes overreactive, a biological response, not a lack of willpower, according to experts at UKAT.

The physiological consequences can be severe. Alcohol withdrawal, for example, can lead to seizures within 24 to 48 hours of the last drink. While opioid withdrawal is rarely directly fatal, the intense physical distress significantly increases the risk of relapse, with rates exceeding 90% without medical assistance.

Attempting self-detox, while seemingly economical, carries substantial risks. Healthcare providers can anticipate and treat potential complications before they escalate into emergencies. They can administer medications to alleviate withdrawal symptoms, prevent seizures, and address dehydration – a common and dangerous consequence of detox. Perhaps most importantly, a supervised environment minimizes the temptation to relapse, offering a structured and supportive setting.

The psychological component is equally vital. Trained staff recognize that irritability, depression, and anxiety are common withdrawal symptoms and can provide appropriate support and treatment, rather than leaving individuals to cope alone.

Effective detox programs share core components. A comprehensive medical assessment is the first step, going beyond simply identifying the substance used. Healthcare professionals evaluate overall health, identify any co-occurring mental health conditions, review medication history, and assess the degree of physical dependence. This assessment informs the individualized treatment protocol. Blood tests, vital sign monitoring, and tools like the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment are used to gauge the severity of anticipated withdrawal symptoms, recognizing that a long-term, heavy drinker will require different interventions than someone with a shorter history of prescription opioid abuse.

Contemporary detox programs increasingly incorporate medication-assisted treatment (MAT). For opioid dependency, medications like buprenorphine and methadone activate the same brain receptors as opioids, but in a controlled and tapered manner, reducing the intensity of withdrawal symptoms. In alcohol addiction, benzodiazepines can prevent seizures, and medications like naltrexone can reduce cravings. According to Priory Group, medically-supervised detoxes can “significantly reduce the risk of severe withdrawal symptoms and relapse.”

Around-the-clock medical care is a hallmark of quality detox programs. Staff continuously monitor blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and oxygen levels, watching for signs of delirium tremens in alcohol withdrawal, respiratory depression in opioid withdrawal, or seizures in benzodiazepine withdrawal. This constant vigilance allows for immediate intervention when necessary, such as administering IV fluids to combat dehydration or treating a rapidly fluctuating heart rate.

Withdrawal symptoms vary widely depending on the substance, duration of use, individual physiology, and overall health. Effective programs anticipate this variability and adjust treatment accordingly, addressing both physical and psychological distress. Symptoms can range from aches, sweating, tremors, nausea, and insomnia to more severe manifestations like anxiety, paranoia, depression, and, in some cases, hallucinations. Healthcare providers utilize a combination of medication, nutritional support, and environmental adjustments – such as providing a quiet, dimly lit room – to maximize patient comfort.

Certain withdrawal syndromes can be fatal. Delirium tremens, occurring in approximately 5% of untreated alcohol withdrawal cases, can lead to fatal seizures. Benzodiazepine withdrawal also carries a risk of seizures. Even opioid withdrawal, while not directly causing death, can lead to fatalities due to severe dehydration and electrolyte imbalances, particularly in settings with limited healthcare access. Medical detox is specifically designed to prevent these life-threatening complications through seizure prophylaxis, cardiac monitoring, and rapid response to emergencies.

Yet, detox is not a cure for addiction. It addresses physical dependence but doesn’t address the underlying psychological, behavioral, and social factors that contribute to substance use. Relapse rates remain high – around 80% in the first year – without follow-up care. Detox stabilizes individuals, creating a foundation for meaningful participation in therapy and counseling.

Quality detox programs don’t simply release patients once physical withdrawal subsides. They collaborate with individuals to develop a comprehensive aftercare plan, potentially including residential treatment, intensive outpatient programs, individual psychotherapy, group counseling, or continued medication-assisted treatment. This planning considers practical aspects like insurance coverage, family support, employment, and geographic location, as well as strategies for managing triggers and accessing community resources.

Adequate detoxification is strongly correlated with long-term sobriety. Patients who undergo medical detox are more likely to engage in and complete treatment programs and less prone to relapse due to traumatic withdrawal symptoms. The process also offers a psychological reset, demonstrating to individuals that they can survive even the most unbearable discomfort without resorting to substances, fostering self-confidence and motivation.

Choosing the right detox environment is crucial. Facilities should have appropriate medical licensing and accreditation from organizations like The Joint Commission or CARF. Physician availability is essential, not just nursing or technician staff. Inquire about protocols for the specific substance involved and the approach to medication-assisted treatment. The physical environment – comfortable common areas, private rooms, and access to outdoor space – also contributes to a positive experience.