Omar El Sayed - World Editor

Tucson, Arizona – Savannah Guthrie, the co-host of NBC’s Today show, announced Tuesday that her family is offering a reward of up to $1 million for information leading to the location of her mother, Nancy Guthrie, who has been missing since February 1.

In a four-minute video posted to Instagram, Guthrie acknowledged the possibility that her 84-year-old mother may be deceased, but emphasized the family’s continued hope for her safe return. “If Nancy Guthrie has died, she said, the family still needs to know where she is,” according to a report from USA Today.

The reward is being offered in addition to a $100,000 reward already offered by the FBI, bringing the total potential reward to $1.1 million. Guthrie urged anyone with information, no matter how small, to come forward. “Tell what you know, and help us bring our beloved mum home so that we can either celebrate a glorious, miraculous homecoming, or celebrate the beautiful, brave and courageous and noble life that she has lived,” she stated in the video.

Nancy Guthrie was reportedly taken from her home north of Tucson in the early morning hours of February 1. The abduction occurred “in the dark of night from her bed,” as described by Guthrie in her Instagram post. The FBI and the Pima County Sheriff’s Department have been investigating the case and have received “tens of thousands of tips,” but have yet to announce any significant breakthroughs.

A key piece of evidence released by investigators is 44 seconds of doorbell camera footage showing a masked and armed individual approaching Nancy Guthrie’s home shortly before her disappearance. Details regarding the suspect’s appearance or vehicle remain limited.

Alongside the increased reward, the Guthrie family is donating $500,000 to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, a non-profit organization dedicated to finding missing children and preventing child sexual exploitation, according to TODAY.com.

Guthrie as well expressed hope that the attention surrounding her mother’s case would extend to other families experiencing the anguish of a missing loved one. “We are hoping that the attention that has been given to our mum and our family will extend to all the families like ours, who are in need,” she said.

According to a timeline published by Fox News, the family has been ruled out as suspects in the disappearance. Investigators are currently pursuing leads related to alleged ransom notes, as reported by the BBC, but details regarding the content or authenticity of those notes have not been publicly released.

As of Tuesday, February 24, 2026, Nancy Guthrie remains missing. The FBI continues to lead the investigation, with assistance from local law enforcement. Officials have not announced any scheduled press conferences or updates regarding the case.

New Delhi – In a sharply worded video statement released Tuesday, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of compromising India’s interests in a recent trade deal with the United States, alleging the country was “sold” to American interests. The remarks came as a direct response to Modi’s criticism of a protest staged by the Indian Youth Congress at the India AI Impact Summit, which the Prime Minister characterized as “dirty and shameless politics.”

Gandhi’s broadside attacks extended beyond the trade deal, referencing the Epstein files and a case against industrialist Gautam Adani as reasons for Modi’s alleged avoidance of parliamentary debate. The Congress leader claimed the Prime Minister is “sleepless” over the potential fallout from these issues, framing them as evidence of deeper corruption and compromised national sovereignty. The escalating rhetoric signals a deepening political battle between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the opposition Congress party, particularly as India prepares for upcoming elections.

Trade Deal Under Fire: Allegations of Compromised Sovereignty

Gandhi specifically challenged Modi to scrap the India-US trade deal, describing it as detrimental to Indian farmers. Addressing a ‘Kisan Mahachaupal’ farmers’ rally in Bhopal, Gandhi called the interim trade deal an “arrow piercing the hearts of Indian farmers,” according to reports from the Times of India. He further alleged that the agreement resulted in India receiving nothing in return, even as simultaneously jeopardizing domestic industries like textiles and compromising the nation’s data security.

The Congress leader’s claims build on previous criticisms of the trade deal, which has been a point of contention between the two parties. Gandhi asserted that the deal was rushed through in the interests of Union minister Hardeep Puri and Gautam Adani, whom he described as “the BJP’s financial structure.” He also alleged that the release of Puri’s name in the Epstein files was a deliberate attempt to intimidate the Prime Minister.

Epstein Files and Adani Case: Linking Allegations to Modi’s Actions

Gandhi further connected the trade deal to the ongoing legal challenges faced by Gautam Adani, claiming the case in the United States is not against the industrialist himself, but against Modi and his “financial architecture.” He suggested that these concerns are the true reason behind Modi’s reluctance to engage in parliamentary debate. The Indian Express reported that Gandhi stated Modi has been having “sleepless nights” thinking about the consequences of the Adani case in the US.

The allegations surrounding the Epstein files, which contain records related to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, have been a recurring theme in Gandhi’s criticisms of the Modi government. He claims that the files contain information implicating Modi and his associates, though specific details remain largely unconfirmed. The US Supreme Court recently ruled against Trump’s global tariffs and invalidated it, a decision Gandhi referenced as a potential opportunity to renegotiate the trade deal.

Modi’s Response and the Context of Recent Protests

The exchange between Gandhi and Modi follows a protest by the Indian Youth Congress at the India AI Impact Summit, where members staged a shirtless demonstration. Modi criticized the protest as “dirty and shameless politics,” prompting Gandhi’s rebuttal. The New Indian Express reported that Gandhi defended the protest as a cornerstone of democracy, accusing Modi of hypocrisy.

The India-US trade relationship has been a key focus of the Modi government, with efforts to strengthen economic ties and strategic partnerships. However, the terms of the trade deal and its potential impact on Indian industries and farmers have drawn criticism from opposition parties and advocacy groups. The current dispute highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding trade liberalization and the balance between national interests and international cooperation.

Looking ahead, the political fallout from these accusations is likely to intensify as India approaches general elections. The debate over the India-US trade deal and the allegations leveled against the Modi government will likely remain central to the political discourse, with both sides attempting to mobilize public opinion. The next procedural step will likely involve continued parliamentary debate, though Modi’s willingness to engage remains uncertain given Gandhi’s claims.

What are your thoughts on the India-US trade deal? Share your opinions in the comments below.

Ukraine’s military claims to have successfully struck a key weapons factory deep inside Russia using a domestically produced long-range cruise missile, the FP-5 Flamingo. The reported strike, which occurred on February 20, 2026, targeted a facility involved in the production of components for Iskander missiles, according to statements from Ukrainian officials. This development marks a significant escalation in Ukraine’s ability to target strategic assets within Russia and highlights the growing importance of indigenous arms manufacturing in the ongoing conflict.

The Ukrainian General Staff reported that the attack resulted in a fire at the targeted facility. While independent verification of the extent of the damage is ongoing, the claim underscores Ukraine’s commitment to disrupting Russia’s military capabilities. The ability to strike such targets is particularly noteworthy given the distance involved and the reliance on domestically produced weaponry, a capability Ukraine has been developing with increasing urgency since the start of the full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Details of the Strike and the FP-5 Flamingo Missile

According to reports, the strike targeted a plant responsible for manufacturing engines for the Iskander missile system, a short-range ballistic missile used extensively by the Russian military. Українська правда reported that the FP-5 Flamingo missile was used in the attack. The FP-5 Flamingo is a Ukrainian-designed cruise missile, representing a significant advancement in the nation’s defense industry. Details about the missile’s range and payload remain limited, but its successful deployment demonstrates Ukraine’s growing self-reliance in arms production.

The targeted facility is also reportedly involved in the production of components for the Yars and Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles, which form a key part of Russia’s nuclear arsenal. UNITED24 Media published satellite images purportedly showing damage to the facility following the strike. The Ukrainian military has not released detailed information about the extent of the damage, but stated that a fire was confirmed at the site.

Geopolitical Context and Regional Stakes

This strike occurs amidst a period of intensified fighting in eastern Ukraine and increasing concerns about the potential for escalation. Ukraine has repeatedly stated its intention to target military assets within Russia, arguing that these strikes are necessary to disrupt Russia’s war effort. Russia has consistently condemned these actions as acts of terrorism and has vowed retaliation. The utilize of domestically produced weapons like the FP-5 Flamingo is a direct response to limitations in Western arms supplies and a demonstration of Ukraine’s resolve to continue the fight.

The attack also carries broader geopolitical implications. It demonstrates Ukraine’s growing capacity to project force beyond its borders, potentially altering the strategic calculus of the conflict. The targeting of facilities involved in the production of nuclear missile components raises concerns about the potential for miscalculation and escalation, although Ukrainian officials have emphasized that the strikes are aimed solely at military targets. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported that the strike targeted a weapons factory in central Russia, further extending the range of Ukraine’s capabilities.

What to Watch Next

The coming days will be crucial in assessing the impact of the strike and Russia’s response. Further satellite imagery and on-the-ground reporting will be needed to verify the extent of the damage and determine whether the facility can be quickly repaired. The international community will be closely monitoring the situation for any signs of escalation, and diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the conflict are likely to intensify. Ukraine’s continued development and deployment of domestically produced weapons will undoubtedly remain a key factor in shaping the future trajectory of the war.

What are your thoughts on Ukraine’s increasing ability to strike targets within Russia? Share your perspectives in the comments below.