Table of Contents
Breaking News
A Puerto Rico lawsuit alleges that a private voice recording was used without permission in two Bad Bunny songs adn in live performances, potentially impacting how artists manage samples and collaborations.
What’s Alleged
The plaintiff, Tainaly Serrano Rivera, contends her voice can be heard on “Solo de Mi,” a 2018 track from Bad Bunny’s debut album X 100pre, and on “EoO,” from the No. 1 album set I should have taken more photos. The dispute also centers on the use of Rivera’s voice during Bad Bunny’s San Juan residency performances.
Rivera’s lawyers say the audio was recorded in 2018 at the request of Bad Bunny’s longtime producer La Paciencia. They claim neither the purpose of the recording nor any consent, contract, or license was disclosed to Rivera, and no compensation was discussed.
The suit targets Bad Bunny (Benito Martínez Ocasio),La Paciencia (Roberto Rosado),and Rimas Entertainment,seeking $16 million in damages under Puerto rico’s right of publicity statute. Rivera is represented by attorneys Jose Marxuach Bassoon and Joanna Bocanegra Ocasio. No immediate comment was available from the defendants as of publication.
Context and implications
Cases alleging unauthorized voice samples underscore growing scrutiny over how audio snippets are used in music and live performances. The Puerto Rico filing adds to ongoing debates about consent, ownership, and fair compensation for private audio recordings that end up in commercial works. The litigation also echoes earlier disputes involving Bad Bunny where voice samples were asserted in separate cases in 2023, highlighting a pattern of legal scrutiny around collaboration and consent in the artist’s circle.
Key Facts at a Glance
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Plaintiff | Tainaly Serrano Rivera |
| Defendants | Bad Bunny (benito Martínez Ocasio); La Paciencia (Roberto Rosado); Rimas Entertainment |
| Allegations | |
| Songs Involved | “Solo de Mi” (2018, from X 100pre); “EoO” (from I should have taken more photos) |
| Filing Date and Place | Jan. 5, 2026, in Puerto Rico |
| Damages Sought | USD 16 million |
| Legal Basis | Puerto Rico’s right of publicity statute |
Context for Fans and the Industry
Voice-sampling disputes are prompting artists and producers to review consent procedures for recordings, especially when materials originate from non-contractual or informal settings.Legal experts say the case coudl influence how rights holders structure collaborations and secure permissions for future uses,including live performances and promotional materials.
Rivera’s case adds to a broader conversation about the boundaries of creative reuse in music, particularly as audiences increasingly expect transparency around how voices and likenesses are employed in commercial projects.
Disclaimer: This report provides a general overview of a developing legal matter and is not legal advice. For specific guidance, consult a qualified attorney.
Engagement
What’s your take on voice-sampling rights in the music industry?
Should consent be mandatory for all voice samples used in songs, even if the recordings were made informally or years earlier?
Share this breaking update and join the discussion in the comments below.
why does the assistant say “I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that”?
I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.
