Home » Economy » BlackRock Clinic Founder Opposes South Dublin Housing Plans

BlackRock Clinic Founder Opposes South Dublin Housing Plans

Ireland’s Housing Crossroads: Will ‘Build-to-Sell’ Schemes Finally Unlock Supply?

The battle lines are drawn in Blackrock, south Dublin, where a plan for 252 ‘build-to-sell’ (BTS) homes is facing fierce opposition from local residents, including prominent healthcare executive James M Sheehan. This isn’t simply a local dispute; it’s a microcosm of a national crisis. Ireland’s housing shortage is arguably the most pressing issue facing the country, and the debate over the best path forward – build-to-rent versus build-to-sell – is reaching a fever pitch. But beyond the immediate conflict, a crucial question looms: can a shift towards BTS developments truly address the demand, or are we simply trading one set of problems for another?

The Blackrock Objection: A Familiar Story

Mr. Sheehan, co-founder of several leading private clinics, isn’t alone in his opposition. Over 30 residents have lodged objections to Cairn Homes’ proposal for apartments and houses on the Chesterfield site. Concerns center around overdevelopment, loss of privacy, and the erosion of the neighborhood’s character. These objections echo a common sentiment across Ireland – a fear that rapid development will sacrifice quality of life and community cohesion. The proposed eight-story apartment blocks are a particular point of contention, seen as out of scale with the existing low-rise suburban landscape.

Planning consultant David Armstrong, representing other objectors, argues the scheme represents “over-development and over-densification.” This isn’t merely aesthetic preference; it raises practical concerns about traffic congestion, parking, and strain on local amenities. The O’Sullivans, local residents, believe the development prioritizes “commercial gain at the expense of amenity.” These arguments highlight a fundamental tension: balancing the need for increased housing supply with the preservation of existing community standards.

From ‘Build-to-Rent’ Backlash to ‘Build-to-Sell’ Pivot

Cairn Homes’ current proposal is a direct response to a previous rejection. Last year, An Coimisiún Pleanála (The Planning Commission) refused permission for 355 ‘build-to-rent’ (BTR) apartments on the same site, citing concerns about an over-concentration of rental properties in the area. This refusal underscores a growing skepticism towards BTR schemes, which have been criticized for potentially exacerbating affordability issues and failing to address the needs of first-time buyers.

Build-to-sell developments, in contrast, are explicitly designed for owner-occupation. Cairn’s planning consultants, McCutcheon Halley Chartered Planning Consultants (MHP), emphasize that the new scheme “aligns with the identified housing needs” of the Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council and contributes to Ireland’s overall housing demand. The argument is simple: more homes for sale mean more opportunities for people to get on the property ladder.

The Future of Irish Housing: Beyond BTS vs. BTR

While the shift from BTR to BTS appears to be a pragmatic response to planning concerns, it’s unlikely to be a silver bullet. The core issue isn’t simply *how* homes are built, but *enough* homes are built. Several key trends will shape the future of Irish housing, demanding a more nuanced approach than simply favoring one model over another.

Trend 1: The Rise of Suburban Regeneration

Sites like the Chesterfield site in Blackrock – underutilized land within established suburban areas – represent a significant opportunity. Expect to see more developers targeting these locations for infill projects. However, successful regeneration requires careful planning and genuine community engagement. Ignoring local concerns, as seen in Blackrock, risks prolonged delays and further fueling opposition to development.

Trend 2: Modular Construction and Speed to Market

Traditional construction methods are slow and expensive. Modular construction – building homes off-site in factories and then assembling them on location – is gaining traction as a way to accelerate delivery and reduce costs. Companies like Vision Built are leading the charge, demonstrating the potential of this technology to address the housing crisis. Increased adoption of modular construction could significantly shorten project timelines and increase housing supply.

Trend 3: The Impact of Remote Work on Housing Demand

The pandemic-induced shift to remote work has fundamentally altered housing preferences. Demand for larger homes with dedicated office space, and for properties in more rural or suburban locations, has increased. This trend is likely to continue, requiring planners to rethink zoning regulations and infrastructure investments to accommodate changing needs. The traditional focus on commuting distance to city centers is becoming less relevant for a growing segment of the population.

Trend 4: Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Homes

Growing environmental awareness and rising energy costs are driving demand for sustainable and energy-efficient homes. New building regulations are increasingly focused on reducing carbon emissions and improving energy performance. Developers who prioritize sustainability will likely have a competitive advantage, attracting environmentally conscious buyers and tenants. This includes incorporating features like solar panels, rainwater harvesting systems, and high-performance insulation.

Navigating the Complexities: A Call for Collaborative Solutions

The Blackrock dispute highlights the need for a more collaborative approach to housing development. Developers, planners, and local communities must engage in meaningful dialogue to find solutions that address both housing needs and quality-of-life concerns. Simply imposing developments from above is likely to generate resistance and delay progress.

“The key to unlocking Ireland’s housing potential lies in fostering a more constructive relationship between developers and communities. Transparency, genuine consultation, and a willingness to compromise are essential.” – Dr. Lorcan Sirr, Housing Economist, Technological University Dublin.

Ultimately, solving Ireland’s housing crisis requires a multifaceted strategy. ‘Build-to-sell’ schemes can play a role, but they are not a panacea. Embracing innovation, prioritizing sustainability, and fostering collaboration are crucial steps towards creating a more affordable and equitable housing system for all.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between ‘build-to-rent’ and ‘build-to-sell’?

A: ‘Build-to-rent’ (BTR) developments are designed for long-term rental, typically managed by a single entity. ‘Build-to-sell’ (BTS) developments are designed for individual ownership and sale to homebuyers.

Q: Why is there opposition to ‘build-to-rent’ schemes in Ireland?

A: Concerns include potential for inflated rental prices, limited opportunities for homeownership, and the impact on local communities.

Q: What is modular construction?

A: Modular construction involves building homes off-site in a factory setting and then transporting and assembling them on the final location. It’s often faster and more cost-effective than traditional construction.

Q: How will remote work impact housing demand in Ireland?

A: Remote work is likely to increase demand for larger homes with dedicated office space and for properties in more suburban or rural locations.

What are your predictions for the future of housing in Ireland? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.