Border Clashes in Thailand and Cambodia: Safeguarding Civilians

Border Clashes Escalate: Civilians Bear Brunt as Thailand and Cambodia Accused of Violating International Law

Phnom Penh/Bangkok – Rising tensions along the Thailand-Cambodia border have ignited grave concerns over the safety of civilians and the potential violation of international humanitarian law. explosive weapons, with their indiscriminate and devastating impact, are increasingly implicated in the ongoing clashes, while accusations of antipersonnel mine use cast a dark shadow over regional stability.

The use of explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas, such as villages, towns, and cities, presents a critical threat to civilian populations.Their inherent inaccuracy, extensive blast radius, and the rapid delivery of multiple munitions inflict immediate harm, damaging not only lives but also essential civilian structures. The reverberating, long-term consequences are equally dire, with destroyed buildings and crippled critical infrastructure hindering access to vital services like healthcare and education. Moreover, these weapons contribute to widespread displacement and the destruction of cultural heritage and the environment, as documented in Human Rights Watch reports.

Both Cambodia and thailand have previously signaled their commitment to civilian protection by endorsing the 2022 political declaration. This declaration pledges to adopt and implement national policies and practices aimed at preventing and addressing civilian harm, including restrictions on the use of explosive weapons in populated areas.

The situation has been further exacerbated by reports of antipersonnel mine injuries sustained by Thai soldiers in two separate incidents on July 16 and 23. Thailand has alleged that Cambodian forces recently emplaced these deadly weapons in Thai territory, an accusation Cambodia has vehemently denied.

Both nations are signatories to the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, a comprehensive prohibition on the production, transfer, stockpiling, and use of antipersonnel mines. The treaty mandates state parties to prevent and suppress any noncompliance, including by prosecuting and punishing those responsible for mine use on their territory. In light of these grave accusations, Cambodia and Thailand are urged to engage with Japan, currently presiding over the Mine Ban Treaty, to activate the treaty’s “cooperative compliance” procedures.

In response to Cambodia’s request, the UN Security Council is scheduled to convene an urgent meeting on July 25 to address the escalating border clashes.

“Neither Thailand nor Cambodia appears to be paying attention to international humanitarian law at grate expense to civilians,” stated sifton, highlighting the critical need for adherence to the laws of war. “Diplomatic efforts underway need to prioritize protecting civilians and civilian infrastructure.”

The international community watches with growing concern as these border disputes threaten the lives and livelihoods of innocent civilians, underscoring the urgent need for de-escalation, accountability, and unwavering respect for international humanitarian law.

What specific measures could be implemented to enhance the effectiveness of rapid deployment forces in protecting civilians during border clashes?

Historical Context of Thailand-Cambodia Border Disputes

The Thailand-Cambodia border has been a source of tension for over a century, rooted in colonial-era mapping discrepancies and competing territorial claims. The most notable flashpoints have centered around the Preah Vihear Temple, a UNESCO World Heritage site.

Early Disputes: Initial disagreements arose in the early 20th century during French colonial rule in Indochina. France’s mapping of the border favored Cambodia, a point of contention for Thailand (then Siam).

Preah vihear Temple: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in 1962 that the temple belonged to Cambodia, but questions regarding the surrounding territory remained unresolved.

Recent Clashes: Renewed clashes occurred between 2008 and 2011, primarily around the temple, resulting in casualties on both sides. Thes incidents highlighted the fragility of the peace and the urgent need for civilian protection. These conflicts involved artillery fire and infantry engagements, displacing thousands.

Ongoing Negotiations: Bilateral talks continue, aiming to fully demarcate the border and prevent future escalations. However, progress has been slow, and sensitivities remain high.

The Impact on Civilian Populations

Border clashes disproportionately affect civilians, disrupting lives and creating humanitarian crises. Understanding these impacts is crucial for effective safeguarding strategies.

Displacement: Armed conflict forces communities to flee their homes, seeking refuge in safer areas.This leads to internal displacement and, in some cases, cross-border movements.

Loss of Livelihoods: Agricultural lands are ofen located near the border, making communities dependent on farming vulnerable to disruption. Clashes destroy crops, livestock, and infrastructure, leading to economic hardship.

Psychological Trauma: Exposure to violence and displacement causes significant psychological distress, especially among children.Long-term mental health support is often lacking.

Access to Essential Services: Conflict disrupts access to healthcare, education, and other essential services, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities.

Landmine and UXO Contamination: Past conflicts have left a legacy of landmines and unexploded ordnance (UXO),posing a continuing threat to civilians,even after hostilities cease.

International Humanitarian Law and Civilian Protection

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) provides a framework for protecting civilians during armed conflict. Key principles include:

Distinction: Parties to the conflict must distinguish between combatants and civilians, targeting only military objectives.

Proportionality: Attacks must not cause civilian harm that is excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.

Precaution: All feasible precautions must be taken to avoid or minimize civilian harm.

Humanitarian Access: Humanitarian organizations must have unimpeded access to populations in need.

Strategies for Safeguarding Civilians

Effective civilian protection requires a multi-faceted approach involving governments, international organizations, and local communities.

1. Strengthening Border Security & Diplomacy:

Joint Border Patrols: Collaborative security measures between Thailand and Cambodia can help deter armed groups and prevent cross-border incursions.

High-Level Dialogue: Continued diplomatic efforts are essential to resolve outstanding territorial disputes peacefully.

Confidence-Building Measures: Joint advancement projects and cultural exchanges can foster trust and cooperation.

1. Early Warning and Response Systems:

Community-Based Monitoring: Empowering local communities to monitor and report potential threats.

Rapid Deployment Forces: Establishing well-trained and equipped rapid response forces to protect civilians in imminent danger.

Evacuation Plans: Developing and regularly updating evacuation plans for vulnerable communities.

1. Humanitarian Assistance and Support:

Emergency Relief: Providing immediate assistance to displaced populations, including food, shelter, and medical care.

Long-Term Recovery: Supporting livelihood restoration and infrastructure rehabilitation.

Psychosocial Support: Offering mental health services to address the trauma of conflict.

Mine Action: Investing in mine clearance and UXO removal programs.

1. advocacy and Accountability:

raising Awareness: Highlighting the plight of civilians affected by border clashes.

*