Home » Economy » Both accused of attacking advocate Baidyanath Upadhyay were beaten fiercely by lawyers in the court premises

Both accused of attacking advocate Baidyanath Upadhyay were beaten fiercely by lawyers in the court premises

Jamshedpur Courtroom Erupts in Violence: Advocates Beat Accused in Police Custody – Urgent Updates

Jamshedpur, Jharkhand – A shocking scene unfolded at the Jamshedpur Court today as advocates launched a brutal attack on two individuals in police custody, accused of assaulting a local BJP leader. The incident, which occurred within the court premises, necessitated the intervention of a Quick Response Team (QRT) to restore order and protect the accused. This breaking news story highlights a disturbing breakdown of courtroom security and raises critical questions about the boundaries of justice and public outrage.

Attack Unfolds Before Magistrate’s Arrival

The accused, identified as Sumit Baig and Guhiram Singh, were brought before Civil Judge Senior Division First Class Judicial Magistrate DR Tirkey, facing charges related to the alleged assault of Baidyanath Upadhyay, the BJP Golmuri Mandal President, near Mango Dimna. However, before the magistrate could enter the courtroom, advocates reportedly spotted the accused in the verandah and immediately attacked them. Witnesses describe a chaotic scene where “eight-ten advocates” physically assaulted the men while police stood by, seemingly unable to intervene.

“It was a complete free-for-all,” said a court official who wished to remain anonymous. “The advocates were enraged. The police were overwhelmed. It took the QRT’s arrival to finally separate everyone.”

Citizen Journalism Meets Legal Boundaries

Adding another layer to the unfolding drama, a young man and a young advocate attempted to document the incident on their mobile phones. They were quickly intercepted by other lawyers, who reportedly beat the young man and reprimanded the advocate for recording within the court premises. The footage and photos were subsequently deleted from their devices, raising concerns about freedom of the press and the legality of recording within courtrooms. This incident underscores the increasingly complex relationship between citizen journalism and established legal protocols. While transparency is vital, courts often restrict recording to maintain order and protect the integrity of proceedings. Understanding these restrictions is crucial for anyone attempting to document legal events.

Judge Takes Serious Note, Accused Remanded to Jail

The escalating chaos prompted District Head and Sessions Judge Arvind Kumar Pandey, along with the Registrar and Judicial Magistrate, to emerge from their courts to investigate. Judge Pandey reportedly took the matter very seriously, issuing directives to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Both accused have been remanded to jail pending further investigation.

The charges against Baig and Singh include obstructing government work, unlawful assembly, road obstruction, and attempted murder of a police officer, ASI Amar Singh Rathore of MGM police station. Notably, Advocate Upadhyay has not yet filed a formal complaint regarding the initial assault against him.

The Growing Concern of Courtroom Security in India

This incident in Jamshedpur isn’t isolated. Across India, concerns are mounting regarding courtroom security. While the legal system is designed to be impartial, the emotional intensity of cases – particularly those involving high-profile figures or perceived injustices – can sometimes boil over. Increased security measures, including stricter screening procedures and a greater police presence, are often discussed, but implementation varies widely. The Jamshedpur case serves as a stark reminder of the potential for violence and the urgent need for robust security protocols to protect all parties involved in legal proceedings. This event will undoubtedly fuel the debate surrounding court security and the role of law enforcement in maintaining order within the judicial system.

The events in Jamshedpur are a chilling reminder of the fragility of order within the legal system. The attack on the accused, the suppression of citizen journalism, and the judge’s swift response all contribute to a complex narrative that demands further scrutiny. As investigations continue and the legal process unfolds, archyde.com will remain committed to providing comprehensive and up-to-date coverage of this developing story, offering insights into the broader implications for justice and security in India. Stay tuned for further updates and analysis as this breaking news story evolves.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.