Breaking Down Silos: How EHRs Can Unite Payers and Providers for Effective Value‑Based Care

Breaking: Payers and Providers seek New Playbook too Accelerate Value‑Based Care Adoption

december 15, 2025 – As value‑based care (VBC) reshapes reimbursement across the United States, a fresh wave of data shows that collaboration gaps between insurers and clinicians remain the biggest obstacle to delivering outcomes‑driven treatment.

Why Collaboration Is Now a Must‑Do

In the latest CMS report released in August 2024, more than 45 % of Medicare Advantage members were enrolled in a value‑based contract, yet readmission rates fell only 3 % compared with fee‑for‑service benchmarks. Experts say the modest improvement stems from fragmented data streams that keep payers and providers operating in silos.

“Transformation isn’t just a policy shift; it’s a connectivity challenge,” said Amanda Banister,senior manager at Veradigm,during a Veradigm webinar on September 12,2024. “When insurers and clinicians use disconnected systems,patients experience reactive,piecemeal care.”

Data Silos Undermine the whole‑Patient View

Effective VBC requires a 360‑degree view of each patient’s health history, medication regimen, and social determinants. Yet more than 70 % of providers report that critical claims data from payers arrives days-or weeks-after a clinical encounter, according to a Health Affairs survey of 1,200 clinicians.

Without real‑time insight, physicians resort to manual chart pulls and redundant testing, inflating costs and eroding trust.

EHRs as the Bridge Between Payors and Providers

Electronic health‑record platforms are evolving from passive data repositories to proactive decision‑support hubs. Modern EHRs now embed payer‑derived risk scores, care‑gap alerts, and medication adherence flags directly into the provider workflow.

Banister highlighted that native integrations can surface a patient’s missed preventive screening at the moment a clinician opens the chart, turning “data latency” into “actionable insight.”

💡 Pro Tip: ask your EHR vendor about “real‑time claims feeds” and “care‑gap widgets.” These features can cut the average time to close a preventive‑care gap from 14 days to under 48 hours.

Strategic Moves Payers Can Make Today

• Start with bite‑size, measurable goals-e.g., reduce duplicate imaging by 10 % in a pilot network.
• Provide clinicians with dashboards that translate raw claims data into concise risk scores rather than dense spreadsheets.
• Tie incentives to transparent,shared‑savings models that reward both outcome improvement and workflow efficiency.
• Offer technical assistance for integrating payer APIs into existing EHRs, relieving clinicians of custom‑coding burdens.

Key Comparison: Conventional Fee‑for‑Service vs. Value‑Based Care

How did the HITECH Act unintentionally contribute to challenges in payer-provider data exchange?

---

Backstory & technical Foundations

The push to dismantle data silos between payers and providers began in earnest after the 2009 HIT Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which offered $27 billion in incentives for hospitals to adopt certified electronic health‑record (EHR) systems. While the act succeeded in boosting EHR adoption rates-from 9 % of hospitals in 2008 to 96 % by 2020-it also exposed a new problem: most EHRs were “closed boxes” that exchanged data only within the same vendor ecosystem.

A pivotal turning point arrived with the 2015 CMS Interoperability and Patient‑Access final rule, which mandated that Medicare‑advantage plans make claims and enrollment data available to providers via secure APIs.This requirement catalyzed the development of standards such as the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and the Direct Project, both of which provide a uniform language for sharing clinical and financial data in near real‑time.

The 2018 ONC “Cures Act” rule escalated the agenda by prohibiting information‑blocking practices and requiring that all certified EHR technology (CECT) support API‑based data exchange by 2021. Consequently, major EHR vendors-including Epic, Cerner, and Allscripts-released FHIR‑based integration platforms (e.g., Epic’s app Orchard, Cerner’s Code) that allow payers to push risk scores, prior‑authorization status, and social‑determinant metrics directly into the clinician’s workflow.

Since 2020,numerous payer‑provider pilots have demonstrated measurable gains.A 2022 Blue Cross Blue shield‑New York pilot with an integrated claims‑feed reduced duplicate imaging orders by 12 % and shortened care‑gap closure times from an average of 14 days to 3 days. By 2024, the average cost of adding a real‑time claims API to a mid‑size health‑system’s EHR had fallen to roughly $150,000-a 30 % decrease from early‑adopter figures in 2020-making large‑scale rollout financially feasible for most organizations.

Milestone / event	Year	Key Specification / Standard	Impact on Payer‑Provider Integration	Representative Cost (USD)
HITECH Act Incentives for EHR Adoption	2009‑2014	Meaningful Use Stage 1‑3	Accelerated EHR penetration; highlighted need for interoperability	$0 ( federal incentive)
CMS Interoperability & Patient‑Access Final Rule	2015	Standardized API requirements for Medicare Advantage	First mandated payer data feeds to providers	$50,000‑$80,000 (initial API development)
ONC Cures Act Rule (Information‑Blocking Ban)	2018‑2021	FHIR R4, SMART on FHIR, Bulk‑Data Export	Vendor‑agnostic data exchange; opened market for third‑party apps	$120,000‑$180,000 (vendor integration upgrades)
First Large‑Scale Payer‑Provider Pilot (Blue Cross blue Shield‑NY)	2022	Real‑time claims API + risk‑score widget	demonstrated 12 % reduction in duplicate imaging; 78 % faster care‑gap closure	≈ $150,000 (mid‑size system integration)
Nationwide Adoption of FHIR‑Based Care‑Gap Alerts	2024‑2025	FHIR® CarePlan, CDS Hooks	Embedded preventive‑care prompts; average gap‑closure time <48 hrs	Variable; $100,000‑$250,000 per health‑system (scale‑dependent)

Long‑Tail Queries

Is breaking down silos via EHR‑payers integration safe?

Yes. Modern integrations rely on industry‑standard security protocols-oauth 2.0 for authentication, TLS 1.3 encryption for data transit, and granular consent management built into FHIR‑based APIs. Regulatory frameworks such as HIPAA, HITECH, and the Cures Act explicitly require audit trails and breach‑notification procedures, which most certified EHR vendors already embed. Moreover, pilot studies have shown no increase in data‑privacy incidents when proper token‑based access controls are enforced.

What does it cost to implement silo‑breaking EHR solutions over time?

Initial implementation (API development,vendor licensing,staff training) typically ranges from $120,000 to $250,000 for a moderate‑size health system. Ongoing operational costs-maintenance, version upgrades, and API usage fees-average $30,000‑$45,000 annually. However, most organizations recoup these expenses within 18‑24 months through reduced duplicate testing, lower readmission rates, and shared‑savings contracts with payers. For large integrated delivery networks, economies of scale can drive per‑facility costs below $100,000, while smaller clinics may leverage cloud‑based “integration‑as‑a‑service” platforms for as little as $10,000 upfront.