Bret Hart Reveals WWE’s Mixed Signals: Invited to SummerSlam 2025 Yet Denied a Seat

Bret Hart Feels “Unappreciated” by WWE After SummerSlam Snub

Detroit, MI – Wrestling legend Bret “The hitman” Hart revealed he felt overlooked by WWE at SummerSlam, despite being invited to attend the event. Speaking at vaughan Con, Hart detailed an incident where he was told no seats were available for him after arriving at the show, despite observing fellow wrestling personality Kevin Nash seated comfortably.

“They invited me down, this year for WWE, and they told me that they wanted me to be in the crowd,” Hart explained.”They told me once I got there that they didn’t have any seats, but I noticed Kevin Nash got a seat, so I just started [shaking my head]. maybe I finally realized that I don’t think they fully appreciated me, even after Hulk [Hogan]’s passing. There is no certain gratitude for anything I did.”

This revelation comes after a period of renewed engagement between Hart and WWE. He last appeared on “WWE Raw” in September, receiving a confrontation from then-World Heavyweight Champion GUNTHER, who declined a title match with Sami Zayn in Hart’s presence, calling him simply “the best there was.” Hart responded by labeling GUNTHER a coward, sparking a brawl between GUNTHER and Zayn.

Hart’s comments raise questions about the relationship between wrestling promotions and their legendary figures. While WWE frequently acknowledges its history, instances like this highlight potential disconnects in recognizing the contributions of those who built the industry.

Adding outlook to his enduring legacy, Hart noted his past meaning within WWE, stating, “Someone told me there’s only three wrestlers alive that were main event wrestlers in the first ten WrestleManias. Sgt. Slaughter is one. Million Dollar man [Ted DiBiase] is the other one. I’m not planning on going anywhere for at least another 30 years.”

This incident underscores the complex dynamics between wrestling icons and the companies they helped establish, and serves as a reminder of the lasting impact of performers like Bret Hart on the world of professional wrestling.

How does Bret Hart’s experience with the SummerSlam 2025 invitation and subsequent denial of accommodation reflect broader issues regarding WWE’s treatment of its legends?

The SummerSlam Snub: A Developing story

Bret “The Hitman” Hart has publicly expressed his frustration with WWE following an invitation to SummerSlam 2025, only to be afterward denied a seat at the event. The revelation, made via Hart’s social media channels on August 12, 2025, has ignited a firestorm of discussion amongst wrestling fans and industry observers. This incident raises questions about WWE’s relationship with its legends and the complexities of navigating professional wrestling politics. The core issue revolves around perceived disrespect towards a Hall of Famer and a pivotal figure in the company’s history.

Timeline of Events: From Invitation to rejection

The sequence of events, as detailed by Hart, unfolded as follows:

1. Initial invitation: Hart received a formal invitation from WWE to attend SummerSlam 2025 in Detroit, Michigan. He interpreted this as a gesture of goodwill and a potential step towards mending fences after years of a strained relationship.
2. Seat Request: Upon accepting the invitation, Hart requested a standard ticket or seating arrangement befitting a WWE Hall of Famer.
3. Denial of Accommodation: Hart alleges that his request was denied, with WWE citing logistical issues and limited seating availability. He claims he was offered a standing-room-only position, which he found unacceptable.
4. Public Outcry: Hart voiced his disappointment publicly, leading to widespread criticism of WWE’s handling of the situation.

This sequence has fueled speculation about the underlying reasons for the denial, with many suggesting it’s more than just a seating issue. Fans are discussing potential reasons on platforms like Reddit and X (formerly twitter), using hashtags like #BretHart and #SummerSlam.

Ancient Context: bret Hart and WWE’s Complicated Past

Understanding the current situation requires acknowledging the tumultuous history between Bret Hart and WWE (formerly WWF). Key events contributing to the fractured relationship include:

The Montreal Screwjob (1997): This infamous incident, where Hart lost the WWF Championship under controversial circumstances, remains a significant point of contention. The screwjob involved vince McMahon ordering the referee to stop the match and award the title to Shawn Michaels,despite Hart not submitting.

Years of Estrangement: Following the screwjob, Hart left WWF and joined WCW.A long period of animosity followed, with Hart frequently criticizing WWE’s management and practices.

Recent Reconciliation Attempts: In recent years, there have been signs of a thawing relationship, including Hart’s induction into the WWE Hall of Fame and sporadic appearances. However, this latest incident suggests that underlying issues persist.

WWE Legends‘ Treatment: this situation echoes concerns raised by other wrestling veterans regarding WWE’s treatment of its legends. Many feel that the company doesn’t adequately recognize or respect the contributions of those who helped build the business.

Potential Reasons Behind WWE’s Decision

Several theories attempt to explain WWE’s decision to deny Hart a seat at SummerSlam. These include:

Budgetary constraints: While unlikely given the scale of the event, WWE could argue that seating was limited and prioritized for sponsors or other VIP guests.

Ongoing Tension: Despite attempts at reconciliation,lingering resentment from key figures within WWE may be a factor.

Control of Narrative: WWE may be hesitant to give Hart a prominent platform, fearing he might publicly address sensitive topics or criticize the company.

Seating Logistics: The venue, Ford Field, is a large stadium, and specific seating arrangements for legends may have been pre-steadfast.However, Hart’s claim that even a standard ticket was denied raises questions.

Impact on WWE’s Public Image & Fan Perception

The incident has undoubtedly damaged WWE’s public image. Social media is flooded with criticism, and many fans are expressing their disappointment with the company’s handling of the situation. This controversy could lead to:

Decreased Fan Loyalty: Some fans may reconsider their support for WWE if thay perceive the company as disrespectful to its legends.

Negative Media Coverage: The story has garnered significant media attention, potentially harming WWE’s brand reputation.

Increased Scrutiny: The incident will likely lead to increased scrutiny of WWE’s treatment of its talent, both past and present.

Lost Opportunities: A positive experience for Hart at SummerSlam could have been a valuable public relations opportunity for WWE.

What This Means for the Future of WWE & Its Legends

This situation serves as a cautionary tale for WWE. Building and maintaining positive relationships with its legends is crucial for preserving the company’s history and appealing to long-time fans. Moving forward, WWE should:

Prioritize Respectful Treatment: ensure that all Hall of Famers and wrestling legends are treated with the respect they deserve.

Improve Communication: Maintain open and honest communication with legends regarding event invitations and accommodations.

Address Underlying Issues: Actively work to resolve any lingering tensions or grievances with former talent.

Invest in Legacy: Recognize and celebrate the contributions of those who helped build the wrestling industry.

The Bret Hart situation highlights the delicate balance between business interests and honoring the past