2024-01-19 02:01:18

American officials directed sharp criticism at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following he announced that he had informed the administration of President Joe Biden of his refusal to establish a Palestinian state following the end of the war in Gaza.

Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said that Netanyahu’s opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state may complicate the Senate’s approval of the aid package for Israel.

Meanwhile, Democratic Senator Peter Welch confirmed that Netanyahu does not share the United States’ concern regarding the loss of Palestinian lives.

He added that Netanyahu’s refusal to establish a Palestinian state reveals that he “wants to take American money while always rejecting its advice,” as he put it.

For her part, Senator Tammy Duckworth described Netanyahu’s statements as “shocking.”

Senator Brian Schatz also considered that Netanyahu is wrong and makes things difficult for Israel’s future.

In turn, US Senator Elizabeth Warren described Netanyahu’s refusal to establish a Palestinian state within any post-war arrangements as “dangerous and contradictory” to American policy.

Warren added that Washington supports the two-state solution because it is the only way to guarantee peace, security, and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians, as she put it.

Public differences have surfaced between Biden (left) and Netanyahu over the way to manage the war on Gaza and the “day following” it (European)

Netanyahu’s statements

Netanyahu said that he informed the United States of his opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state “within the framework of any post-war scenario” in Gaza, contrary to American desire.

In a press conference yesterday, Thursday, Netanyahu pledged to move forward with the attack on Gaza until Israel achieved a “decisive victory” over the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) and to restore those he described as kidnapped, rejecting the idea of ​​a Palestinian state, and saying that he “conveyed his positions to the Americans.”

Netanyahu said: “In any future arrangement, Israel needs security control over all the lands west of the Jordan River.” He added, “The prime minister must be able to say ‘no’ to our friends,” referring to the United States.

The United States called on Israel to reduce its attack on Gaza, and said that the establishment of a Palestinian state must be part of the “day following” the war.

During the past weeks, public disagreements surfaced between Biden and Netanyahu over the way to manage the war on Gaza, and the future of the Strip following the fighting stopped, but these disagreements did not reach the point of stopping or changing the nature of American support for Tel Aviv.

Last week, the Axios news website reported that the US President hung up the phone on Netanyahu during their last call, in new evidence of the expansion of the dispute as a result of the ongoing Israeli war on the Gaza Strip for 105 days.

Before that, Biden said that Israel had begun to lose global support because of what he described as its indiscriminate bombing of Gaza, but he reiterated that Tel Aviv might rely on American support and stressed that he supported “its right to defend itself.”

The US President hinted at the existence of differences in his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stressing that the latter is in a “difficult position.”

1705633839
#storm #criticism #Netanyahu #statements #Palestinian #state #News

2024-01-19 00:05:17

Read also: The victory of Aleksandar Vucic’s party in the Serbian legislative elections is confirmed

“We also talk regarding corruption”

The European Parliament yesterday looked into the Serbian elections, which according to the opposition were marred by fraud and vote buying. Several parliamentarians discussed the preliminary report by OSCE observers, published on December 18, the day following the elections. It describes a vote “marked by isolated cases of violence, procedural irregularities and frequent allegations of organizing and transporting voters to support the ruling party in local elections”, as well as “vote buying and ballot stuffing.

Read also: Thousands take to the streets in Belgrade to denounce alleged electoral fraud

In Belgrade, the opposition claims that the SNS organized the convoy of thousands of unregistered voters to the capital to vote “on a scale that decisively influenced the result”. According to the director of the non-governmental organization CRTA, Rasa Nedeljkov, “many people were paid for this. So we also talk regarding corruption. We are talking here regarding an operation which must have cost hundreds of thousands of euros.” A previous complaint, filed on January 12, was deemed inadmissible by the courts.

Read also: Vote buying, ballot stuffing: Serbian prosecutor’s office calls for investigation into alleged electoral fraud
1705633129
#Serbian #opposition #appeals #Constitutional #Court #annul #presidential #election #result