Entertainment

Boris Moiseev passed away on September 27 last year. The tragic news was a blow to many. According to the law, six months following the death of a person, his heirs will have to receive what they are entitled to. At the end of March, it will be exactly six months since the singer died.

For the property of the performer, his elder brother Marx Tolkach is ready to fight. The man is the only relative of Boris Moiseev. Note that the capital’s apartment of the star has already passed to its director Sergei Gorokh according to the rental agreement, but this does not stop his brother.

The shaman Elvira Usubaliyeva spoke regarding the likely development of events. She believes that a third party will fight for the celebrity inheritance. “Most likely, the illegitimate child of the artist will appear,” the psychic is quoted by the portal Prozvezd.info. She is sure that this is not at all the outrageous showman Stas Baretsky, who previously declared his relationship with Boris Moiseev. According to Usubalieva, the musician still has an illegitimate daughter or son.

She suggested that one of the members of his famous trio “Expression” gave birth to Moiseev. However, the shaman said that the singer’s property would eventually go to Sergei Gorokh.

It is noteworthy that data have recently appeared that Kristina Orbakaite may also begin to fight for the inheritance of Moiseev. After all, the artist called her his daughter and loved her very much. But, according to the shaman, this will not happen.

Some fans believed that Peas influenced the death of Moiseev in order to take possession of his property as soon as possible. However, Usubalieva is sure that the director and friend of the star is not to blame for the tragedy. Recall that Boris Moiseev struggled with the consequences of a severe stroke for 12 years.

The previously famous showman and blogger Rustam Solntsev explained, why during his lifetime Boris Moiseev bequeathed all his property to Sergey Gorokh.

A golden trophy but no foul. In a decision made public on Thursday, Arcom considers that Cyril Hanouna did not commit any fault by celebrating the audience records for his show in October. Do not touch My TV ! the day following an issue largely devoted to murder of Lola.

“The acclaimed audiences concerned the first two months of the season and not recent sequences during which tragic events might be mentioned”, judges the audiovisual regulator in this decision taken in December and published Thursday on its website. Arcom “has therefore not identified any element likely to constitute an attack on the dignity of the human person”. Several sequences of TPMP in connection with the murder of Lola, 12, on October 14, had given rise to reports from viewers to Arcom.

Insults once morest MP Louis Boyard

In the main of these cases, the C8 channel (Canal+ group), which broadcasts TPMP, received a formal notice on November 18, because Cyril Hanouna had called for summary trials in cases similar to Lola’s murder. This measure, which targeted programs broadcast on October 18, 19 and 24, is the second level of warning from Arcom before possible sanctions.

The decision rendered on Thursday relates to a sequence from the October 19 broadcast. A party was then organized on the set to celebrate the audiences of the show. During this party, the boss of C8, Franck Appietto, had given Cyril Hanouna a gold trophy bearing the date of the day before. The issue of October 18, partly devoted to Lola, had indeed exceeded the bar of two million viewers.

In addition to the proceedings concerning the Lola affair, C8 and TPMP might also be penalized for insults from Cyril Hanouna towards the deputy LFI Louis Boyard on the November 10 issue. A week following this incident, Arcom had paved the way for a sanction procedure by forwarding this new case to an independent reporter, a member of the Council of State.

This Thursday at noon the verdict was known that found guilty Magdalena Esposito Valentimother of Lucio Dupuyand your partner Abigail Peace, for the murder of a five-year-old boy in La Pampa. However, despite the fact that it was detected that Lucio had been sexually abused, that crime was not charged to his mother in the sentence, but only to his partner.

On the one hand, the mother of Lucio Dupuy, 25, was found guilty of the crime of homicide triple qualified by the link, treachery and crueltyfor which he will receive the sentence of life imprisonment when the penalty is set. Nevertheless, She was acquitted of the sexual assault charge.. It is that unanimously, the Court of Hearings of Santa Rosa understood that the principle of in doubt for the accusedthat is, the benefit of the doubt in favor of the accused.

On the other hand, in the case of Abigail Páez, 28 years old and partner of Espósito Valenti, she was found guilty of the crime of homicide doubly qualified for treachery and cruelty, in real competition with the crime of sexual abuse with carnal access through the anal route, executed with a phallic object, aggravated for being the guardian and for having been committed once morest a minor under 18 years of age, taking advantage of the pre-existing living situation.

The chats of the accused of the crime of Lucio Dupuy: from the tenure claim to “we are going to send a shit”

In this way, despite the fact that both will receive life imprisonment, one might receive a maximum sentence of 50 years and the other a maximum sentence of 35 years.

“Although then I have no doubts regarding the occurrence of the event (sexual abuse), the manner, time and element used (or at least one of them); yes, instead, I believe that the accusing parties have only managed to produce proof regarding the authorship of one of them: Páez”, argued Judge Olié in his vote, which was supported by his colleagues.

Although he already knows Páez and Valenti as guilty, the sentencing hearing was set for February 13 at 8 in the morning.

For his part, Judge Olié explained: “There were several witnesses to those first moments of Lucio, already lifeless, outside the apartment (where he lived with the accused), taken by Páez who reported having heard his version that ‘they might having beaten and abused’, according to what agent Argüello declared, and that ‘they had raped him’, according to Edgardo Mourino and Lady Esther Soria, who assisted Páez to take the child to the Evita Hospital and to whom it was reasonably brought to their attention how she This allows me to attribute the crime of sexual abuse to Páez, since she knew that the child had been subjected to sexual abuse, a circumstance that directly links her to the fact, in the absence of other evidence gathered during the debate that reasonably explain such knowledge, revealed by his repeated warning to other people”.

Crime of Lucio Dupuy: the mother and her partner were found guilty of murder

Likewise, the judge added that it was proven that Lucio suffered sexual abuse by Páez for at least two months before his death.

“I will then take it as proven that Páez, while living with Lucio, his partner’s son, at the home of Allan Kardec 2385, apartment 2, in the city of Santa Rosa, carried out acts of anal penetration with a phallic object on the child, in such a way that five years of age at the time of the event, repeatedly for at least two months before his death, without being able to specify the exact time of such grievances,” said the judge.

To justify the ruling that acquits Lucio’s mother of sexual abuse, they detailed that “The evidentiary plexus gathered, especially that referring to the genetic expert evidence, determined the finding of genetic material of both defendants and of Lucio. If the first is perfectly reasonable and expected, as long as it is an element intended for use by them [el objeto fálico]the second becomes incriminating with respect to the sexual abuse attributed, although it is not possible to ensure, with the rigor required by a conviction, that this is also due to the action of Espósito Valenti: it is perfectly feasible that his DNA was already there, for previous employment, when the remaining defendant sexually assaulted the child”.

JD / ds

Only 30 issues of Prince Harry’s Memoirs “Spare” are said to have been sold in the posh town of Montecito, British media reported at the end of last month. Could this be because the Dukes of Sussex have lost some celebrity friends? how express.co.uk now reported, should at least Oprah Winfrey and the Obamas are no longer part of the couple’s inner circle.

Oprah: No birthday invitation for Sussexes?

Oprah Winfrey has so far been considered a supporter of Meghan and Harry, who also gave the talk show icon a controversial TV interview in 2021, in which they openly made allegations once morest the British royal family for the first time. Oprah, who like the Sussexes lives in Montecito, was also named as a friend of Duchess Meghan traded.

The relationship may have cooled down by now. When Winfrey celebrated her 69th birthday over the weekend at a star-studded soiree attended by the who’s who of Hollywood’s upper class, Meghan and Harry were reportedly not on the guest list.