Read the latest Entertainment news, on Archyde. Stay informed with global economic updates and expert insights.
Belgian author Herman Brusselmans has announced his departure as a jury member on the popular quiz show ‘De Slimste Mens ter Wereld’ (The Smartest Person in the World), despite recently having a conversation with the show’s host, Erik Van Looy. Brusselmans, known for his often-provocative writing, cited a growing disconnect with the current composition of the jury and a feeling of being sidelined as key reasons for his decision. The news comes after a season where he felt underutilized, appearing only twice despite a history of frequent participation.
The author explained his frustration with the show’s current jury selection process, stating that many members lack the necessary expertise to properly evaluate contestants. He contrasted the current panel with previous iterations that included seasoned stand-up comedians like Jeroom and Philippe Geubels, whom he considered true professionals in the field. Brusselmans believes that success on the show itself doesn’t automatically qualify someone to be a judge, pointing to Felix, a recent winner, who quickly became a prominent public figure. “They are suddenly bombarded, like Felix who won, that is suddenly one of the most famous Flemish people there are,” he said, according to VRT News.
Brusselmans’ decision follows a period of questioning his role on the show, having been told last season that, due to the large number of jury members, his appearances would be limited. This season, he was only invited to participate twice, a significant reduction from his previous involvement of “12, 13 times” per season. He expressed suspicion that this limited participation was intentional and sought clarification from Van Looy. He intends to discuss the matter further with the presenter.
Concerns Over Jury Composition
The core of Brusselmans’ discontent lies in what he perceives as a dilution of expertise within the jury. He argues that being a judge on ‘De Slimste Mens ter Wereld’ is a “profession” and that the current panel includes too many individuals without relevant experience. This criticism extends to those who have achieved success as contestants, suggesting their newfound fame doesn’t automatically translate into sound judgment. He feels the quality of the jury has diminished, impacting the overall integrity of the show.
Play, the television channel broadcasting the show, has responded to Brusselmans’ critique by inviting him to a meeting with Erik Van Looy, signaling a willingness to address his concerns. TV Visie reports that Play has left the door open for Brusselmans’ return, hoping to resolve the issues he has raised.
Recent Controversies and Continued Appearances
Brusselmans’ decision comes after a period of controversy surrounding his writings. Two months ago, he faced accusations of antisemitism following comments made in a column for Humo magazine. Despite the backlash, he continued to appear on other television programs, including ‘De tafel van Gert’ and ‘Kamp Jeroom’. Redactie24 reported that Erik Van Looy received an email from the Forum of Jewish Organizations demanding Brusselmans’ removal as a juror, but Van Looy refused.
Brusselmans himself dismissed the calls for his removal, stating, “Certain people are of the opinion that I should no longer be in entertainment programs after my controversial column, but I don’t care about that.” He also noted that the show’s editors shared his sentiment.
Despite his departure from ‘De Slimste Mens ter Wereld’, Herman Brusselmans remains a prominent figure in the Flemish cultural landscape. His decision highlights ongoing debates about the role of expertise and experience in television entertainment and the balance between public opinion and artistic freedom.
The future of the jury on ‘De Slimste Mens ter Wereld’ remains to be seen, but Play’s willingness to engage with Brusselmans suggests a potential for adjustments to address his concerns. It will be interesting to observe how the show evolves in response to this situation and whether it will lead to a broader discussion about the criteria for jury selection. Share your thoughts in the comments below.