Breaking stories and in‑depth analysis: up‑to‑the‑minute global news on politics, business, technology, culture, and more—24/7, all in one place.
“`html
Pakistan Cricket Announces squad for ICC U19 Cricket World Cup: Naseem Shah’s brother Included
Table of Contents
- 1. Pakistan Cricket Announces squad for ICC U19 Cricket World Cup: Naseem Shah’s brother Included
- 2. Pakistan Names Strong Squad for U19 Cricket World Cup
- 3. Key Squad selections and Team Dynamics
- 4. ICC U19 Cricket World Cup: A Platform for Future Stars
- 5. Understanding the Squad Composition
- 6. How will Saud shakeel’s captaincy in the Shaheens tour impact his chances of a permanent spot in the Pakistan national team?
- 7. Shakeel to Captain Pakistan Shaheens on England Tour
- 8. Appointment Details & Squad Implications
- 9. Saud Shakeel: A Rising Star in Pakistan Cricket
- 10. Tour Schedule & Match Details (Confirmed as of July 11, 2025)
- 11. Key Players to Watch in the Shaheens Squad
- 12. The Importance of the Pakistan Shaheens Program
- 13. Potential Impact on Future Pakistan Squads
By Archyde Staff Writer
Pakistan Names Strong Squad for U19 Cricket World Cup
Pakistan has revealed its 18-member squad for the upcoming ICC U19 Cricket World Cup. The selection notably includes Ubaid Shah, the younger brother of Pakistan’s star fast bowler Naseem Shah. This inclusion highlights a potential legacy in the making for the Shah family in international cricket. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has put together a promising contingent, aiming to bring home the prestigious junior title.
Alongside Ubaid Shah, left-arm wristspinner Faisal Akram also earned a spot in the squad. Akram’s unique bowling style is expected to be a notable asset for Pakistan in the tournament. The squad selection reflects a blend of proven young talent and emerging players eager to make their mark on the global stage.
Did You Know? ubaid Shah, like his brother Naseem, is a fast bowler, bringing a familiar pace element to the Pakistan attack.
Key Squad selections and Team Dynamics
The Pakistan U19 squad is poised to make a strong impression at the ICC U19 Cricket World Cup. The inclusion of Ubaid Shah, who has been performing well in domestic junior cricket, signals the PCB’s confidence in nurturing new talent. His presence is sure to draw considerable attention,given his family’s strong ties to Pakistan cricket.
Faisal Akram’s inclusion as a left-arm wristspinner adds an exciting dimension to the bowling attack. This type of bowler can often prove difficult for opposition batsmen to read, especially in crucial match situations. the coaching staff will be looking to leverage Akram’s distinctive skills to create breakthroughs.
The team’s preparation will be crucial as they build up to the tournament.Cohesion and match practise will be key to their success. National selectors have emphasized a commitment to youth growth, and this squad represents the latest generation of cricketers aiming for international success.
ICC U19 Cricket World Cup: A Platform for Future Stars
The ICC U19 Cricket World Cup serves as a vital stepping stone for aspiring cricketers. Many of the world’s top international stars,including several from Pakistan,have graced this tournament in their formative years. This event provides an invaluable opportunity for players to gain experiance against diverse opposition and under intense pressure.
Pakistan has a rich history in the U19 Cricket World cup,having won the title twice. The team will be aiming to replicate that success in the upcoming edition. The focus will be on developing a winning mentality and executing strategies effectively throughout the tournament.
Pro Tip Young bowlers often find success in junior tournaments by varying their pace and developing a deceptive slower ball. Ubaid Shah might find this notably useful facing international competition.
Understanding the Squad Composition
The 18-member squad is a testament to the depth of talent within Pakistan’s junior cricket system. Players have been selected based on their performances in age-group tournaments and domestic competitions. The aim is to field a well-balanced side capable of competing against the best teams in the world.
Key areas of focus for the selectors included building a potent pace attack, a formidable spin department, and a reliable batting lineup. The inclusion of players like Ubaid Shah and Faisal Akram suggests a strategic approach to filling these crucial roles.
| Player | Key Attribute | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Ubaid Shah | Fast Bowler | Brother of naseem shah; brings pace to the attack. |
| Faisal Akram | Left-arm Wristspinner |
How will Saud shakeel’s captaincy in the Shaheens tour impact his chances of a permanent spot in the Pakistan national team?
Shakeel to Captain Pakistan Shaheens on England TourAppointment Details & Squad ImplicationsThe Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has announced Saud Shakeel as the captain of the Pakistan Shaheens squad for their upcoming tour of England. This marks a important step in Shakeel’s career, showcasing the PCB’s faith in his leadership abilities. The tour, scheduled for late July and August 2025, will see the Shaheens engage in a series of List A and T20 matches against county and university sides. this provides crucial growth opportunities for emerging Pakistani cricketers. The appointment follows a period of evaluation by the PCB,considering various candidates for the role.shakeel’s consistent performance in domestic cricket and his calm demeanor on the field were key factors in his selection. the Shaheens tour serves as a vital pathway for players aiming to break into the national Pakistan cricket team. Saud Shakeel: A Rising Star in Pakistan CricketSaud Shakeel, a top-order batter, has steadily risen through the ranks of Pakistani cricket. Known for his solid technique and ability to build long innings, Shakeel has become a mainstay in Pakistan’s domestic circuit. Domestic Record: Shakeel boasts an impressive average in First-Class cricket, consistently scoring runs for Sindh. International Exposure: He has already represented Pakistan in both Test and ODI formats, demonstrating his adaptability to international conditions. Leadership Qualities: Observers have noted his ability to motivate teammates and make sound tactical decisions during pressure situations. This is a key reason for his captaincy appointment. batting Style: Shakeel is a technically sound player, known for his defensive solidity and ability to rotate the strike effectively. He is also capable of playing aggressive shots when required. Tour Schedule & Match Details (Confirmed as of July 11, 2025)The Pakistan Shaheens tour of England will consist of the following matches:
All matches will be played under standard List A and T20 regulations. The tour aims to expose the Shaheens players to the challenging conditions of English cricket,including seaming pitches and variable weather. Key Players to Watch in the Shaheens SquadBeyond the captain, several players are expected to make a significant impact during the England tour: Mohammad Huraira: A promising young opener with a reputation for aggressive strokeplay. Aamer Jamal: A fast-bowling all-rounder capable of generating pace and bounce. Usama Mir: A leg-spin bowler with a good track record in domestic cricket. Rohail Nazir: A wicket-keeper batsman known for his consistent performances. Thes players represent the future of Pakistan cricket and will be looking to impress the national selectors with their performances in England. The Shaheens squad provides a platform for these emerging talents to gain valuable experience and develop their skills. The Importance of the Pakistan Shaheens ProgramThe Pakistan Shaheens program plays a crucial role in the development of Pakistani cricket. It serves as a bridge between domestic cricket and the national team, providing a platform for emerging players to showcase their talent and gain experience in competitive conditions. Player Development: The program focuses on honing the skills of young cricketers and preparing them for the rigors of international cricket. Exposure to Foreign Conditions: Tours like the England tour provide valuable exposure to different playing conditions and cultures. Talent Identification: The Shaheens program helps the PCB identify and nurture promising talent from across the country. Strategic Readiness: The program allows the PCB to experiment with different team combinations and strategies. Potential Impact on Future Pakistan SquadsShakeel’s captaincy and the performance of the Shaheens squad could have a significant impact on future Pakistan national team selections. A accomplished tour could see several Shaheens players earning call-ups to the senior squad. Shakeel himself will be aiming to solidify his place in the national team with strong performances both as a batsman and a leader. The PCB will be closely monitoring the progress of all players on the tour, with a view to building a strong and competitive national team for the years to come. This tour is a key component of Pakistan’s long-term cricket strategy. Texas Faces Flood Crisis Amidst Criticisms of FEMA‘s Flood Management HUNT, Texas – Authorities are grappling with the aftermath of significant flooding along the Guadalupe River in Hunt, Texas, where the rising waters have inundated roadways, forcing vehicles to navigate treacherous conditions. The scene, with a car bravely pushing through the floodwaters on July 9, 2023, highlights the immediate challenges faced by communities during such natural disasters. This event, however, has also reignited scrutiny of federal disaster response, with South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem recently voicing sharp criticism of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Noem, speaking to the FEMA Advisory Council, a body tasked with recommending reforms, including potential restructuring of the agency, alleged “gross mismanagement adn negligence” within FEMA. Her comments, directed at both the current Biden governance and previous administrations, painted a stark picture of systemic failures. “The list of famous failures is staggering,” Noem asserted, underscoring a deep-seated dissatisfaction with the agency’s track record. It is indeed noteworthy that former Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who appointed Noem to the council, has been a vocal advocate for enhancing disaster preparedness and response. As Texas residents contend with the immediate impacts of the flooding, the broader conversation around FEMA’s effectiveness continues. The agency’s ability to provide timely and adequate support in the face of escalating weather events remains a critical concern for officials and the public alike. The absence of Acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson from the affected texas areas as of Thursday afternoon further fuels these ongoing discussions. Evergreen Insights on Flood Preparedness and Disaster Response: The recurrent nature of significant flooding events, especially in regions like Texas, underscores the enduring importance of robust disaster preparedness and response strategies. This situation serves as a stark reminder of several key principles: Infrastructure Resilience: Investing in and maintaining flood-resilient infrastructure, such as improved drainage systems and elevated roadways, is crucial for mitigating the impact of rising water levels. The events in Texas serve as a tangible illustration of the ongoing need for effective governance and preparedness in the face of environmental challenges, encouraging a proactive approach to these persistent issues. What political calculations might be influencing Trump’s highly visible response to the Texas floods, contrasting with criticisms received during hurricane Harvey?Table of Contents
Trump Visits Texas Amidst Flood Crisis, Sidestepping Past CriticismThe Texas Floods of 2025: A Rapidly Developing SituationSevere flooding across central and southeastern Texas in July 2025 has prompted a federal disaster declaration and a visit from former President Donald Trump. Record rainfall, exceeding 20 inches in some areas, has overwhelmed drainage systems and led to widespread evacuations. Major cities like Houston, San Antonio, and Galveston are grappling with inundated streets, power outages, and disruptions to essential services. The National Guard has been deployed to assist with rescue efforts and provide aid to affected communities. This disaster is prompting comparisons to Hurricane Harvey in 2017, though the current situation is characterized by inland flooding rather than coastal storm surge. Trump’s Texas Trip: A Calculated move?Trump’s visit to the disaster zone is being closely watched, particularly in light of his past relationship with Texas and his often-controversial responses to natural disasters during his presidency.He arrived in Houston on July 11th, touring affected areas and meeting with local officials and first responders. Focus on Federal Aid: Trump emphasized the federal government’s commitment to providing financial assistance and resources to support recovery efforts. He announced an additional $10 billion in federal aid for Texas, building on the initial disaster declaration. Avoiding Direct Comparisons to Harvey: Unlike his response to Hurricane Harvey, which drew criticism for perceived slow action and downplaying the severity of the situation, Trump has adopted a more visibly supportive tone. He refrained from making controversial statements or engaging in political attacks during his public appearances. photo opportunities & Public Perception: The visit was heavily documented with photo opportunities showcasing Trump interacting with flood victims and praising the work of emergency personnel. This is widely seen as an attempt to rehabilitate his image and demonstrate leadership. Past Criticism & The Texas ConnectionDuring his presidency, Trump faced scrutiny for his handling of several natural disasters, including:
His previous interactions with Texas have been largely positive, enjoying strong support from the state’s conservative base. Though, the memory of perceived shortcomings during Harvey remains fresh for many Texans. This visit appears strategically designed to counter that narrative. The Role of FEMA & Disaster Relief EffortsThe Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) is playing a crucial role in coordinating the federal response. Key FEMA activities include: Search and Rescue Operations: Supporting local teams in rescuing stranded residents. Providing Shelter and Supplies: Establishing temporary shelters and distributing essential supplies like food, water, and blankets. Damage Assessment: Conducting thorough assessments to determine the extent of the damage and inform aid allocation. Individual Assistance Programs: Offering financial assistance to individuals and families affected by the floods. Beyond FEMA, numerous organizations, including the American Red cross, Salvation Army, and local charities, are providing on-the-ground support. Volunteer efforts are also critically important, with thousands of Texans offering their time and resources to help their neighbors. Potential Long-Term Impacts & Infrastructure ConcernsThe Texas floods highlight the growing vulnerability of communities to extreme weather events. Experts warn that climate change is exacerbating the risk of heavy rainfall and flooding. Infrastructure Investment: The disaster underscores the urgent need for investment in infrastructure improvements, including upgraded drainage systems, flood control measures, and resilient building codes. climate Change Adaptation: long-term solutions require proactive climate change adaptation strategies, such as land-use planning, wetland restoration, and improved early warning systems. Economic Costs: The economic impact of the floods is expected to be substantial, with significant damage to homes, businesses, and infrastructure. Recovery efforts will require billions of dollars in funding. While focused on the Texas floods, it’s worth noting recent developments regarding potential personnel changes in a future Trump management.Reports indicate Donald Trump is considering Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for the position of Health and Human Services Secretary. This move, as reported by Ärzteblatt [https://www.aerzteblatt.de/news/nach-trump-wahl-wie-amerika-angeblich-wieder-gesund-werden-soll-4676ff8c-04ad-4fc7-a402-3190d8b988f1](https://www.aerzteblatt.de/news/nach-trump-wahl-wie-amerika-angeblich-wieder-gesund-werden-soll-4676ff8c-0 March Madness on the Brink of Expansion? Discussions Heat Up Over Increasing Tournament Field The iconic NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, a staple of March sports, is reportedly considering a importent expansion of its field. While the exact number of additional teams remains undecided, discussions are centering around a potential increase to either 72 or 76 teams. Currently, the men’s tournament has featured 68 teams as its expansion in 2011, a format that includes the “First Four” play-in games.The women’s tournament adopted this 68-team structure in 2022. an expanded tournament would likely build upon the existing “First Four” model,with lower-seeded teams perhaps playing their way into the main bracket. The logistics of how to best implement such an expansion are still being ironed out. The prospect of a larger tournament has drawn mixed reactions. Fans and Division I leaders have expressed some hesitation, leading to the lack of a definitive decision thus far. A primary argument in favor of expansion is the inclusion of more deserving teams that might otherwise be excluded from the current 68-team field. For instance, ESPN bracketologist Joe Lunardi has suggested that teams like West Virginia, Indiana, Boise State, and Ohio State could have realistically made the cut in 2025 with a 72-team format. while the timing and the exact number of teams are still up for debate, the expansion of March Madness appears to be an increasingly likely development in the near future. What are the primary financial incentives driving the consideration of expanding the NCAA tournament to 72 or 76 teams?Table of Contents
March Madness Expansion: 72 or 76-Team Brackets Considered FeasibleThe Current Landscape of the NCAA TournamentFor decades, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament, affectionately known as March Madness, has captivated the nation with its 68-team bracket. Though, ongoing discussions about expanding the tournament to either 72 or 76 teams are gaining momentum.This isn’t simply about adding more games; it’s a complex debate involving revenue, competitive balance, and the future of college basketball. Understanding the driving forces behind this potential NCAA tournament expansion is crucial for fans, analysts, and stakeholders alike. Key terms frequently searched include “March Madness bracket size,” “NCAA expansion proposals,” and “college basketball tournament changes.” Why Expand March Madness? The Core ArgumentsSeveral compelling arguments support expanding the March Madness bracket. Increased Revenue: A larger tournament translates directly into increased revenue from television rights, ticket sales, and sponsorships. The NCAA and conferences stand to benefit significantly. More Automatic Bids: Expansion allows more conferences to secure automatic bids, increasing participation and excitement within smaller leagues. This addresses concerns about equitable access to the tournament. Enhanced Competitive Balance: Including more teams, especially those with strong regular-season performances but lacking high RPI/NET rankings, could lead to a more representative and competitive field. Addressing Bid Discrepancies: The current system often leaves deserving teams on the bubble out of the tournament, sparking controversy and debate. Expansion aims to mitigate this issue. Fan Engagement: More games mean more opportunities for fans to engage with the tournament,boosting viewership and overall interest in college basketball. The 72-Team Bracket proposal: A Closer LookThe 72-team model is often presented as a more conservative approach to expansion.Here’s how it would likely work: Automatic Bids: All 32 Division I conferences would receive an automatic bid. At-Large Bids: 40 at-large bids would be awarded by the NCAA selection Committee, based on factors like RPI, NET ranking, strength of schedule, and conference performance. Frist Four: The First Four games would remain, possibly expanding to eight games to accommodate the additional teams. Regional Structure: The regional structure would likely be adjusted to accommodate the increased number of teams. This model is favored by some as it maintains a relatively manageable bracket size while still addressing concerns about access and competitive balance. Searches related to this include “72-team March Madness bracket,” “NCAA tournament format changes,” and “conference tournament implications.” The 76-Team Bracket Proposal: A More Radical ShiftThe 76-team proposal represents a more significant overhaul of the tournament structure. Automatic Bids: All 32 Division I conferences would receive automatic bids. At-Large Bids: 44 at-large bids would be awarded. First Four: The First Four would likely expand to accommodate the additional teams, potentially involving more play-in games. Potential for Multiple Sites: To handle the increased number of games, the NCAA might need to utilize more first and second-round sites. This model is seen as potentially more inclusive but also raises concerns about diluting the quality of the tournament and extending its duration. Common searches include “76-team NCAA tournament,” “March Madness expansion impact,” and “college basketball tournament logistics.” Potential Challenges and Concerns with ExpansionDespite the potential benefits,expanding March Madness isn’t without its challenges: Impact on Regular Season: Concerns exist that expansion could diminish the importance of the regular season,as more teams would have a path to the tournament through automatic bids. Tournament Fatigue: Extending the tournament could lead to player fatigue and potentially affect the quality of play in later rounds. Logistical Complexities: Managing a larger tournament requires significant logistical planning, including securing venues, coordinating travel, and ensuring adequate media coverage. Dilution of Quality: Some argue that adding more teams could dilute the overall quality of the tournament, as less-qualified teams gain entry. Revenue Distribution: Debates surrounding how increased revenue would be distributed among conferences and institutions are ongoing. Case Study: Past Tournament Expansions & Their effectsThe NCAA has expanded the tournament before. The jump from 64 to 68 teams in 2011 provides a valuable case study. While the “First Four” games were initially met with skepticism, they’ve become a popular part of the tournament experience and have generated significant revenue. However, the expansion also led to increased scrutiny of the selection process and debates about the fairness of automatic bids. this past context BREAKING: Coalition Ditches Nuclear Power in Emissions Strategy In a significant shift for Australian energy policy, the Coalition has officially abandoned its proposal to introduce government-owned nuclear power plants as a cornerstone of its emissions reduction plan for the next three decades. The move comes after intense internal deliberation and follows mounting pressure to align with international investment trends. The Coalition’s initial net zero by 2050 policy, adopted in 2021 just before the UN climate summit in Glasgow, was reportedly the subject of considerable debate, notably between then-deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce and former prime minister Scott Morrison. Morrison, speaking in June, reiterated his belief in maintaining net zero targets, citing the need for Australia to remain attractive to global investors. He emphasized his desire to prevent Australia from becoming an “island” in terms of capital investment, a growing concern at the time. This strategic pivot away from nuclear power signals a potential recalibration of the Liberal party’s approach to climate policy. Matt Kean, former NSW energy minister and current chair of the Climate Change Authority, stressed the importance of evidence-based decision-making. He urged the party to “get back to making rational decisions when it comes to energy policy based on engineering, economics and science,” warning that any deviation from this path would be “a road to ruin.” Evergreen Insights: The Coalition’s decision underscores a recurring theme in energy policy debates: the balance between long-term emissions goals and the immediate economic realities of investment and technological feasibility. The inclusion and subsequent withdrawal of nuclear power highlights the complex interplay of political ideology, public opinion, and scientific consensus in shaping national energy strategies. This progress also serves as a reminder that climate policy is not static. Governments must remain adaptable, responding to evolving scientific understanding, technological advancements, and global market dynamics. The emphasis on “engineering,economics,and science” by figures like Matt Kean points to a broader need for policy grounded in pragmatism rather than purely ideological stances. As the world continues its transition towards a low-carbon future, the ability of political parties to forge consensus on credible and sustainable energy pathways will be crucial for national prosperity and environmental security. What are the potential legal ramifications of Joyce’s private bill to roll back net zero targets?Table of Contents
Joyce to Roll back Net Zero Targets with Private BillUnderstanding the Proposed Changes to Climate PolicyRecent reports indicate that Minister for Climate Action, Eamon Joyce, is preparing to introduce a private bill aimed at significantly altering Ireland’s legally binding net zero targets. This move has sparked considerable debate amongst environmental groups,industry leaders,and political opponents. The proposed legislation seeks to revise the existing commitments outlined in the Climate Action and Low Carbon Advancement act 2021, specifically concerning the timelines for achieving carbon neutrality. The core of the controversy revolves around the feasibility and economic impact of the current targets, with joyce arguing for a more pragmatic and phased approach. Key Provisions of the Private BillThe private bill, currently under development, is expected to include the following key provisions: Revised Target Dates: A postponement of the original 2050 net zero target, perhaps shifting it to 2055 or 2060. This adjustment is justified by Joyce as necessary to allow for adequate technological advancements and infrastructure development. sector-specific Adjustments: Relaxation of emission reduction targets for specific sectors, notably agriculture and transport. These sectors have consistently faced challenges in meeting the stringent requirements set under the existing legislation. Increased Focus on Carbon Leakage: Measures to address carbon leakage, where industries relocate to countries with less stringent environmental regulations, potentially offsetting any emission reductions achieved domestically. Investment in carbon Capture Technologies: A commitment to increased investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and othre innovative technologies as a means of mitigating emissions. Review mechanisms: Establishment of regular review mechanisms to assess progress and adjust targets as needed, ensuring flexibility in response to evolving circumstances. The Rationale Behind the Rollback: Economic ConsiderationsJoyce’s justification for the proposed changes centers on economic concerns. He argues that the current net zero commitments are overly ambitious and could severely damage the Irish economy, particularly in rural areas heavily reliant on agriculture. Agricultural Impact: The agricultural sector, a meaningful contributor to ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions, faces ample challenges in reducing its carbon footprint without impacting food production and livelihoods. Transport Challenges: The transition to electric vehicles and sustainable transport infrastructure requires significant investment and faces logistical hurdles, particularly in rural areas. Energy Security: Concerns about energy security and affordability are also driving the push for a more gradual transition, with a focus on diversifying energy sources. Competitiveness: Maintaining the competitiveness of Irish businesses in a global market is another key consideration,with Joyce arguing that overly stringent environmental regulations could put them at a disadvantage. Reactions and Opposition to the BillThe announcement of the private bill has been met with strong opposition from environmental groups and opposition parties. Green Party Criticism: The Green Party has condemned the proposed changes as a betrayal of Ireland’s climate commitments and a step backwards in the fight against climate change. Environmental NGO concerns: Organizations like Friends of the Earth have expressed concerns that the rollback will undermine Ireland’s credibility on the international stage and jeopardize efforts to limit global warming. Labor Party Opposition: The Labour Party has accused Joyce of prioritizing short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability. * Industry Response: While some industry representatives have welcomed the proposed changes, citing the need for a more realistic and achievable pathway to decarbonization, others have expressed concerns about the potential for regulatory uncertainty. The Role of Carbon Budgets and National strategiesIreland operates under a system of carbon budgets, five-year legally binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions. the proposed bill would likely necessitate a revision of these budgets, potentially leading to higher emission allowances in the short to medium term. This also impacts the implementation of the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), which outlines Ireland’s strategy for achieving its climate goals. Adjustments to the NECP will be required to align with the revised targets. Understanding climate policy and its intricacies is crucial to grasping the implications of this bill. Potential Impacts on Renewable Energy investmentThe rollback of net zero targets could have a significant impact on investment in renewable energy projects. While Joyce maintains that the bill will not discourage investment in renewables, some analysts fear that a less ambitious climate policy could reduce investor confidence and slow down the transition to a low-carbon economy. Specifically, projects related to wind energy, solar power, and bioenergy could be affected. Legal Challenges and Parliamentary ProcessThe private bill is expected to face significant legal challenges, with Adblock Detected |