News

Brasília – Despite being incarcerated since March 2024, Domingos Brazão, convicted of ordering the murder of Rio de Janeiro councilwoman Marielle Franco and her driver Anderson Gomes, continued to receive substantial payments from the State Court of Accounts (TCE) of Rio de Janeiro. Since his imprisonment, Brazão has received over R$726,200 (approximately $146,780 USD as of February 26, 2026) as a court counselor, raising questions about oversight and accountability within the state government. The payments, totaling R$56,000 per month, have sparked outrage and renewed calls for reform.

The Supreme Federal Court (STF) definitively condemned Brazão and his brother, Chiquinho Brazão, along with three other individuals, on February 25, 2026, for their roles in the 2018 killings. Domingos Brazão received a sentence of 76 years and three months in prison, even as his brother, a former federal deputy, received the same sentence. The court also ordered R$7 million (approximately $1.4 million USD) in damages to be paid to the victims’ families. The convictions mark a significant turning point in a case that has been plagued by political interference and obstruction for years.

The continued payments to Brazão while imprisoned underscore a loophole in Rio de Janeiro’s regulations governing TCE counselors. According to reporting, there are no provisions explicitly preventing incarcerated officials from receiving their salaries. This has prompted immediate calls for legislative changes to address the issue and prevent similar situations in the future. The TCE has stated it is reviewing its internal policies, but has maintained that it was legally obligated to continue the payments given the existing rules.

The STF Ruling and Key Players

The STF’s ruling, reached unanimously by the First Panel, detailed the extensive planning and execution of the assassination. Ronald Paulo Alves Pereira, a major in the military police, was also sentenced for his involvement, while Robson Calixto Fonseca, a former advisor to Domingos Brazão, was convicted for providing intellectual and financial support. Rivaldo Barbosa de Araújo Júnior, a former head of the Rio de Janeiro Civil Police, faced a lesser charge of obstruction of justice and passive corruption due to insufficient evidence linking him directly to the murders.

The investigation revealed that the Brazão brothers allegedly ordered the hit due to Marielle Franco’s outspoken criticism of police violence and corruption. Franco, a prominent human rights activist and Black lesbian politician, had been a vocal advocate for marginalized communities in Rio de Janeiro. Her assassination sent shockwaves through Brazil and internationally, becoming a symbol of the country’s deep-seated social and political inequalities.

The court’s decision followed a three-day trial and relied heavily on witness testimony, intercepted communications, and forensic evidence. According to reports, ministers Alexandre de Moraes, Cristiano Zanin, and Cármen Lúcia were instrumental in securing the convictions, with Flávio Dino later joining the majority. The STF’s ruling is considered final, barring any successful appeals.

Financial Discrepancies and Public Outcry

The revelation that Brazão continued to receive a substantial income from the TCE while awaiting and now serving a lengthy prison sentence has ignited public anger and demands for accountability. Critics argue that the payments represent a blatant disregard for justice and a misuse of public funds. Social media platforms have been flooded with calls for the immediate suspension of all benefits for convicted criminals holding public office.

The TCE’s justification that it was legally bound to continue the payments has been met with skepticism. Legal experts have pointed out that the TCE could have sought a legal interpretation or initiated an administrative process to suspend the payments pending the outcome of the criminal trial. The agency’s inaction has fueled accusations of complicity and a lack of transparency.

The case also highlights broader concerns about the influence of powerful individuals within Rio de Janeiro’s political and judicial systems. The Brazão brothers have long been associated with a network of influential figures, and their alleged involvement in the assassination raised questions about potential cover-ups and obstruction of justice.

The YouTube video detailing the STF’s condemnation can be viewed here.

What’s Next?

The focus now shifts to the implementation of the STF’s ruling and the potential for further investigations into the network of individuals allegedly involved in the assassination. Legislative efforts to reform the TCE’s regulations and prevent similar situations in the future are expected to gain momentum. The families of Marielle Franco and Anderson Gomes continue to seek full justice and accountability for the crimes committed against their loved ones. The case serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democracy and the importance of protecting human rights defenders in Brazil and around the world.

What we have is a developing story, and we will continue to provide updates as they grow available. Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Los Angeles – The Loyola Marymount Lions will host the Washington State Cougars tonight in a college basketball matchup where contrasting styles will be on display. Whereas Washington State boasts a potent offense, Loyola Marymount aims to leverage its defensive resilience in what’s expected to be a closely contested game. Analysts are closely examining the strengths of both teams as they prepare for a late-February battle that could significantly impact their respective seasons.

The Cougars, currently 12-17, have demonstrated an ability to score in bursts, making them a dangerous opponent despite their overall record. The Lions, at 14-15, are known for making games difficult for opponents, prioritizing a controlled pace and strong defensive presence. This preview and prediction from DraftKings Network highlights the key factors that could determine the outcome.

Washington State’s offensive prowess is reflected in their adjusted offensive efficiency (AdjOE) of 116.4, coupled with a 55.5% effective field goal percentage (eFG%). They rely heavily on three-point shooting, with 45.0% of their shots originating from beyond the arc, and convert at a 36.9% clip. Their ability to secure second-chance points is likewise notable, grabbing offensive rebounds 29.4% of the time. However, Loyola Marymount presents a significant defensive challenge.

Defensive Strength of Loyola Marymount

Loyola Marymount’s defense, with an adjusted defensive efficiency (AdjDE) of 105.7, is built on limiting opponents’ scoring opportunities. They hold teams to a 48.6% effective field goal percentage (eFGD) and excel at defending two-point shots, allowing only 47.1% from that range – the best single team-shape number in this matchup. The Lions also effectively contest three-point attempts, holding opponents to 34.2% shooting from three and limiting them to 35.6 three-point attempts per game.

A key difference lies in interior defense. Loyola Marymount allows just 53.0% on close two-point shots and 38.5% on farther twos, compared to Washington State’s 58.6% and 43.8%, respectively. This interior gap is particularly significant given the similar adjusted tempo (67.3) of both teams, suggesting that shot quality and half-court control will be crucial. While Loyola Marymount’s offense isn’t explosive (107.3 AdjOE), they are efficient in key areas, converting 84.1% of their dunks, 61.7% of close two-point shots, and earning a 31.4% free throw rate.

Key Players to Watch

Loyola Marymount’s structure is anchored by Myron Amey Jr., who has a 22.7% usage rate with a low 10.5% turnover rate, demonstrating reliable ball-handling. Jan Vide contributes with a 27.9% assist rate, facilitating the offense, while Jalen Shelley adds versatility with a 24.4% usage rate, 44.7% free throw rate, and 19.5% defensive rebounding rate. The Lions’ size is a significant asset, featuring Rick Issanza (7-1) with a 10.0% block rate, alongside Aaron McBride and Joshua Dalton, providing interior defense and rebounding.

Washington State counters with Ace Glass III, who drives the offense with a 27.3% usage rate and a 58.4% true shooting percentage, and Rihards Vavers, known for his efficiency (127.2 ORTG, 63.8 eFG%, 66.2 TS%). ND Okafor provides interior presence with a 10.0% offensive rebounding rate and a 7.2% block rate. However, Loyola Marymount’s size and defensive positioning could disrupt Washington State’s offensive flow.

Betting Outlook and Prediction

According to analysis, Washington State holds a better overall Barthag rating of .6259 compared to Loyola Marymount’s .5425. The Cougars are the stronger shooting team and more inclined to take three-point shots. However, Washington State’s higher turnover rate (18.5% vs. LMU’s 17.9%) and inability to force turnovers could prove costly. The game’s close spread emphasizes the importance of minimizing possessions and capitalizing on interior opportunities.

The home-court advantage for Loyola Marymount is also a factor, extending beyond atmosphere to include rebounding, rim protection, and potentially favorable officiating. The prediction is a narrow victory for Loyola Marymount, 76-73. The best bet, as identified by analysts, is a Loyola Marymount moneyline wager at +100, playable up to -105.

As the college basketball season progresses, matchups like this one highlight the importance of defensive strategy and interior play. The outcome will likely hinge on which team can control the paint, protect the ball, and secure crucial possessions in the closing minutes. Fans can follow sports betting picks for further insights.

The next step for both teams will be to analyze their performance in this game and adjust their strategies for upcoming contests. The remainder of the season promises further competitive matchups and opportunities for both the Lions and the Cougars to improve their standings.

What are your thoughts on this matchup? Share your predictions in the comments below!