News

Dallas-area commuters are navigating significant changes to a key stretch of US 75, formerly known for its high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes. Construction is underway to convert these lanes into “Tech Lanes,” a project designed to improve traffic flow through variable access rules. The transformation, impacting travel between the President George Bush Turnpike and I-635, is expected to continue through the summer of 2026, causing delays and requiring drivers to adjust their routines.

The shift from traditional HOV lanes – restricted to vehicles with two or more occupants or motorcycles – to Tech Lanes represents a significant change in North Texas traffic management. These new lanes will open to all drivers during off-peak hours, while prioritizing carpools during rush hour. A key benefit for drivers is that the Tech Lanes will remain toll-free throughout their operation, a departure from many other managed lanes in the region. The project aims to address growing congestion in one of the fastest-expanding metropolitan areas in the country.

Construction Timeline and Lane Closures

Work began in August 2025, initially focusing on the southbound lanes. Crews are restriping approximately 1,500 to 1,800 feet of the southbound HOV lane nightly between the PGBT and I-635, operating from 9 p.m. To 6 a.m. To minimize disruption to daytime traffic. The southbound HOV lane will remain open throughout the construction period. Around August 25, 2025, work will shift to the northbound lanes between I-635 and PGBT. Once striping begins on the northbound side, that HOV lane will close for the duration of the 11-month project. After the initial striping is completed, work zones will operate both day and night.

Access Restrictions and Vehicle Eligibility

The converted lanes will enforce specific access times. Southbound lanes will restrict access to HOV vehicles, low-emission vehicles, and motorcycles on weekdays from 7 a.m. To 9 a.m. Northbound restrictions will apply weekdays from 4 p.m. To 6 p.m. Outside of these peak hours, all vehicles will be permitted to use the lanes. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) project manager, Travis Campbell, P.E., can answer questions about the project at 214-320-6146. Additional project details are available at keepitmovingdallas.com/US75TechLanes.

Currently, standard HOV lanes in North Texas, as outlined by TxDOT, allow passenger cars, pickup trucks, vans, buses, motorcycles, and emergency vehicles responding to a call. A vehicle must be occupied by two or more people to qualify, with the exception of motorcycles. TxDOT provides detailed information on HOV lane usage and eligibility.

Tech Lanes vs. Traditional HOV and TEXpress Lanes

The Tech Lane concept differs from both traditional HOV lanes and the TEXpress Lanes system in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. While traditional HOV lanes maintain consistent occupancy requirements, and TEXpress Lanes typically operate as toll lanes with HOV discounts available through apps like GoCarma as detailed on the TEXpress Lanes website, the Tech Lanes offer dynamic access based on time of day. This flexibility aims to maximize lane utilization and reduce congestion for all drivers.

The conversion of the US 75 HOV lanes to Tech Lanes is part of a broader effort to improve traffic flow in North Texas. The project represents a $57 million investment by TxDOT, reflecting the growing need for innovative solutions to address increasing commuter demand. Drivers should plan ahead and be aware of the changing lane configurations and access restrictions during the construction period.

As construction progresses, commuters should monitor traffic conditions and adjust their travel plans accordingly. The completion of the Tech Lanes project in the summer of 2026 is expected to provide a more efficient and flexible transportation option for drivers along US 75. The long-term impact of this change on traffic patterns and commute times will be closely watched by transportation officials and commuters alike.

Share your experiences and thoughts on the US 75 Tech Lane conversion in the comments below. Let’s discuss how these changes are affecting your daily commute.

Six Palestine Action activists are set to face a retrial on criminal damage and violent disorder charges following a 2024 raid on an Elbit Systems UK factory near Bristol. The decision comes after they were previously acquitted of aggravated burglary, a verdict that drew criticism from police, lawmakers, and Jewish communal groups. The upcoming trial, scheduled for February 2027, centers on allegations stemming from the protest against the Israeli defense firm, which Palestine Action claims is complicit in weapons manufacturing for the Israeli military – a claim Elbit Systems strongly denies.

The initial incident, which occurred on August 6, 2024, involved a meticulously planned assault on the Elbit facility, as described by reports following the event. The case has sparked debate regarding protest tactics and the legal boundaries surrounding demonstrations targeting defense contractors. Notably, aggravated burglary charges against 18 other defendants initially linked to the raid have been dropped, with prosecutors citing insufficient evidence, according to statements made in court.

Details of the Original Incident and Charges

The six activists – Samuel Corner, 23. Charlotte Head, 29; Leona Kamio, 30; Fatema Rajwani, 21; Zoe Rogers, 22; and Jordan Devlin, 31 – were initially accused of aggravated burglary. While the jury found them not guilty of this charge, they were unable to reach a verdict on charges of criminal damage. Rajwani, Rogers, and Devlin were also acquitted of violent disorder, but verdicts remained outstanding for Head, Corner, and Kamio on that charge. Corner also faces a charge of causing grievous bodily harm.

The grievous bodily harm charge relates to an incident where a police officer, Sergeant Kate Evans, was allegedly struck with a sledgehammer during the raid, resulting in a fractured lumbar spine. Footage of the incident shows Corner striking the officer while she was on the floor, leaving her initially unable to perform basic tasks without assistance and requiring medication for pain, as reported by the Times of Israel.

Government Ban and Subsequent Legal Challenges

The legal proceedings follow a recent setback for Palestine Action, as the UK’s High Court struck down a government ban on the group as a terror organization. This decision came shortly after the initial verdict in the burglary case and adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal battles surrounding the group’s activities. The government’s initial attempt to proscribe Palestine Action reflects the sensitivity surrounding protests targeting Israeli-linked companies.

Retrial Focus and Dropped Charges

The retrial will specifically focus on the criminal damage charges against all six defendants, the violent disorder allegations against Head, Corner, and Kamio, and the charge of inflicting grievous bodily harm against Corner. Prosecutor Deanna Heer KC confirmed the prosecution’s intention to pursue a retrial on these remaining charges at Woolwich Crown Court, according to the Independent. The decision to drop aggravated burglary charges against the 18 other defendants was also announced, with Heer stating the prosecution had reconsidered the sufficiency of the evidence.

Palestine Action alleges that Elbit Systems UK is involved in the manufacture and supply of weapons to the Israeli military, a claim the company strongly denies, as Sky News reported. The group has staged numerous protests and direct actions against Elbit facilities in the UK, aiming to disrupt the company’s operations and raise awareness about its alleged role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The retrial is expected to draw significant attention from both supporters and critics of Palestine Action, and the outcome could have implications for future protests targeting defense contractors. The case highlights the challenges of balancing freedom of expression with concerns about public safety and the protection of critical infrastructure.

As the retrial approaches, the focus will be on the evidence presented regarding the extent of the damage caused during the raid and the intent of the activists involved. The legal proceedings are likely to continue to fuel debate about the appropriate response to protests targeting companies with links to international conflicts.

What comes next will depend on the outcome of the February 2027 retrial. The case will likely continue to be a focal point for discussions surrounding protest rights and the legal boundaries of activism. We encourage readers to share their thoughts and engage in respectful dialogue in the comments section below.