Breaking stories and in‑depth analysis: up‑to‑the‑minute global news on politics, business, technology, culture, and more—24/7, all in one place.
Riga, Latvia – A prominent Latvian influencer and media personality, Ieva Adamss, is facing public criticism after appearing in a commercial for a menopause remedy broadcast on Russian state television. The controversy, brought to light by Latvian political scientist and journalist Marats Kasems on February 14, 2026, raises questions about the intersection of personal gain and national interests amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Kasems detailed his concerns in a lengthy post on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Adamss of collaborating with Russian media at a time when the country continues its military aggression in Ukraine. The advertisement features “klimalanīns,” a product marketed for alleviating menopause symptoms and aired on Russian federal channels known for disseminating pro-Kremlin propaganda, according to Kasems’ report. This has sparked outrage among many in Latvia, who view the move as financially supporting a regime actively engaged in conflict.
Adamss, known for her work as a sex expert, presenter, and influencer with a substantial following on platforms like Instagram, has built a brand around themes of self-development, relationships, and travel. However, her recent appearance in the Russian broadcast has led to accusations of hypocrisy, given her public persona and advocacy for ethical living. The situation highlights a growing concern about the potential for individuals to inadvertently or knowingly contribute to the economic support of Russia’s war effort.
The product itself, “klimalanīns,” is reportedly available in Russian pharmacies. Although seemingly innocuous as a health supplement, its promotion on state-controlled television channels – which simultaneously broadcast justifications for the war in Ukraine – has drawn sharp criticism. Kasems argues that the financial benefits from such advertising ultimately flow into the Russian federal budget, directly funding the ongoing military campaign.
😢 Laiks iet, bet dažas Latvijas slavenības joprojām nesaprot, kur ir robeža starp personīmove labklājību un valsts interešu nodevību.
🤷🏻♂️ Piemēram, var minēt Ievu Adamsu — pazīstamu latviešu influenceri, mediju personību un seksa simbolu, kas savu dzīvi veltījusi seksualitātes… pic.twitter.com/WJl8x2YSA0— Marats Kasems 🇱🇻 🇪🇺 (@MaratQasem) February 14, 2026
Adamss’s Career and Public Image
Ieva Adamss is a well-known figure in Latvian media, working as a lecturer at RISEBA University and the journalism school “Artek,” according to Delfi. She has similarly been described as a “radiogeiša” and frequently participates in fashion and lifestyle events. Recent reports indicate she is preparing to legally change her surname to Adamss, as reported by play.1188.lv. Prior to this controversy, Adamss had been publicly discussing her personal life, including her relationship with her partner, Vladimir, and her views on marriage.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Debate
Kasems’s post on X has generated significant discussion, with many users expressing disappointment and anger towards Adamss. The incident has reignited a debate about the responsibilities of public figures and the ethical implications of collaborating with entities linked to the Russian government, particularly during a time of war. The Latvian public is closely watching for a response from Adamss regarding these allegations.
The situation underscores the broader challenges of navigating economic and professional opportunities in a world increasingly divided by geopolitical tensions. It remains to be seen what impact this controversy will have on Adamss’s career and public standing. Further developments are expected as more information becomes available and as Adamss potentially addresses the accusations directly.
What comes next will likely depend on whether Adamss responds to the allegations and provides context for her involvement in the Russian advertisement. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of seemingly innocuous commercial decisions in the context of international conflict.
Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below.