world

Geneva – A second round of indirect nuclear talks between the United States and Iran concluded in Geneva on Tuesday, with Iranian officials reporting an understanding reached on “general guiding principles” for future negotiations. The progress comes amid heightened tensions, including recent military threats from Washington and Iranian warnings regarding the security of vital waterways.

While details remain limited, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that the discussions were “more constructive” than previous engagements and signaled a potential pathway toward a further meeting focused on Iran’s nuclear program. The United States has yet to issue a public comment on the outcome of the talks. This latest round of diplomacy, mediated by Oman, aims to address concerns over Tehran’s nuclear activities and the potential for de-escalation in the region, following a period of increased military posturing from both sides.

US Military Buildup and Iranian Countermeasures

The negotiations unfolded against a backdrop of a significant US military buildup in the Middle East. President Donald Trump has repeatedly asserted his belief that Iran desires a deal, but has also issued stern warnings and alluded to past military actions. In remarks aboard Air Force One, Trump referenced the use of B-2 stealth bombers in previous operations targeting Iranian nuclear sites, stating, “We could have had a deal instead of sending the B-2s in to knock out their nuclear potential.” He expressed hope that Iran would be “more reasonable” in future discussions.

In response to the US military presence, Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, warned that US warships are vulnerable and that Iran possesses weaponry capable of sinking them. He stated, “Warships are dangerous, but ‘more dangerous than a warship is a weapon that can send it to the bottom of the sea.’” Simultaneously, Iranian state media announced the temporary closure of parts of the Strait of Hormuz for naval exercises, a move that could disrupt global oil flows. A full closure of the Strait, which handles approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply, would have significant economic consequences. NBC News reported on these developments as the talks began.

Focus of Negotiations and Previous Actions

Iran entered the talks seeking the lifting of economic sanctions imposed by the US, while the US has indicated a desire to discuss Iran’s ballistic missile development program in addition to its nuclear activities. The indirect discussions, held at the Omani mission in Geneva, followed a period of heightened tensions stemming from Iran’s crackdown on anti-government protests. The BBC reports that the talks focused on the terms for Iran to constrain its nuclear program under the supervision of the UN nuclear weapons inspectorate.

Prior to Tuesday’s meeting, the Iranian foreign ministry expressed optimism that the US position on the nuclear issue was evolving toward a “more realistic one.” However, the path forward remains uncertain. Araghchi cautioned that reaching a final agreement would be a complex process, stating, “The path toward an agreement has started but we will not reach it quickly.” He added that both sides would now work on drafting texts for consideration in future negotiations.

What to Watch Next

The coming weeks will be critical in determining whether these initial “guiding principles” can translate into concrete progress toward a renewed nuclear agreement. The lack of immediate comment from the US side leaves the extent of their commitment unclear. Further negotiations are expected, but the timing and location remain to be determined. The ongoing US military presence in the region and Iran’s continued military exercises will likely continue to shape the dynamics of the talks. The situation remains fluid and carries significant implications for regional stability and global energy markets.

What are your thoughts on the progress made in these talks? Share your comments below and help us continue the conversation.

Spain’s political paralysis is beginning to raise concerns about long-term economic consequences, according to Laurine Pividal, economist for Southern Europe at the credit risk management firm Coface. Speaking at the ‘Country Risk Conference’ in Paris on Tuesday, Pividal warned that the ongoing political uncertainty will impact industrial strategy and the public deficit.

While Pividal indicated that there is currently no direct, medium-term impact on the Spanish economy, she highlighted the energy sector as particularly vulnerable. “The Government is not approving reforms for the energy sector, nor is it voting on new investments or subsidies on electricity prices or network costs for industries,” she stated, according to reporting from 20minutos.

Pividal suggested Spain requires a more structural shift to improve productivity and address the public deficit, advocating for policies that support industry. She pointed to the discrepancy between Spain’s renewable energy subsidies and the high costs faced by energy-intensive industries due to network costs, comparing the situation unfavorably to Germany and France, where similar businesses benefit from greater support.

Despite these concerns, Pividal acknowledged Spain’s positive macroeconomic figures, but anticipates a slowdown in economic growth in 2026. This growth, she explained, is currently driven by strong domestic demand, fueled by increased purchasing power and wage increases that are outpacing inflation, with wage increases averaging around 3.5 percent. She also noted that immigration is contributing to economic growth, with 70 percent of the increase in the active population since 2022 coming from foreign nationals.

Pividal also addressed the allocation of funds from the European Union’s NextGenerationEU recovery plan. While acknowledging the positive impact of the recent influx of funds, she noted that the Spanish government has opted to forego approximately 67 billion euros in available loans, choosing instead to seek financing from the markets. She suggested this decision was motivated by a desire to avoid the reforms and investment conditions attached to the EU funds, characterizing it as a simpler option for the government.

According to Coface, as of January 8, 2026, 42 percent of the NextGenerationEU funds – over 270 billion euros – remain unspent, with a deadline for disbursement at the end of 2026. This delay, the firm states, risks both short-term economic growth and long-term structural reforms.

Berlin – The Alternative for Germany (AfD), a far-right political party gaining traction in several German states, is facing a growing scandal involving allegations of nepotism. The accusations center around multiple instances of elected officials employing family members as assistants and staffers, raising questions about the party’s commitment to transparency and accountability, particularly as it positions itself as an advocate for the “common person.”

The revelations come at a critical juncture for the AfD, with key regional elections looming in Baden-Württemberg on March 8th and Saxony-Anhalt in September. The party has consistently attacked established political groups, labeling them “Altparteien” (old parties) and accusing them of corruption, making these internal allegations particularly damaging. The unfolding situation threatens to undermine the AfD’s anti-establishment narrative and potentially impact its electoral prospects.

Several cases have come to light in recent days. In Baden-Württemberg, Markus Frohnmaier, the AfD’s leading candidate for the upcoming state election, has a wife employed as an assistant to another AfD politician. Similarly, in Saxony-Anhalt, the father of Ulrich Siegmund, the party’s top candidate for the September election, is reportedly receiving a monthly salary of 7,500 euros – approximately 80,000 Swedish kronor – for his work as an assistant to a member of the Bundestag. Dagens Nyheter first reported these details.

While these practices are not explicitly illegal, they have drawn criticism from within the party itself. Tino Chrupalla, the AfD’s vice chairman, acknowledged the situation “doesn’t look good,” stating it “tastes a little strange” in an interview with ARD television. Hufvudstadsbladet reported on Chrupalla’s comments. He also admitted to employing the wife of another AfD politician in his own “citizen’s office,” a type of reception area German politicians can open to constituents.

AfD’s History of Anti-Corruption Rhetoric

The current scandal is particularly ironic given the AfD’s frequent accusations of corruption against other parties. The party has built a significant portion of its platform on criticizing what it perceives as a corrupt and outdated political system. Nyheter Sverige highlights this contrast, noting the party’s previous attacks on other political groups.

Broader Context of Far-Right Gains in Germany

The AfD has experienced a surge in popularity in recent years, capitalizing on concerns about immigration, economic inequality, and national identity. In the 2024 European Parliament elections, the party achieved a surprising victory, winning more votes than any other single party despite a united front from other political groups. Aftonbladet reported on this outcome, noting the shock among established parties.

This success has been attributed to a combination of factors, including dissatisfaction with mainstream parties and the AfD’s effective utilize of social media to spread its message. However, the party’s extremist views and controversial statements have also drawn widespread condemnation. The current nepotism scandal adds another layer of scrutiny to the AfD’s internal practices and its public image.

What to Watch Next

The coming weeks will be crucial for the AfD as it attempts to navigate this crisis. The regional elections in Baden-Württemberg and Saxony-Anhalt will serve as key tests of the party’s resilience and its ability to maintain voter support in the face of these allegations. Further investigations and potential revelations could also emerge, potentially escalating the scandal and further damaging the AfD’s reputation. The party’s response to these challenges will likely shape its trajectory in the months and years to come.

What are your thoughts on the AfD scandal? Share your opinions in the comments below and consider sharing this article with your network.