Global coverage at a glance: breaking international headlines, geopolitical insights, regional developments, and on‑the‑ground reports from every continent.
Washington D.C. – Former President Donald Trump formally launched his “Board of Peace” initiative on Thursday, outlining plans for reconstruction in Gaza and signaling a broader ambition to address conflicts worldwide. The inaugural meeting, held at the U.S. Institute of Peace, comes after Trump announced the board’s creation at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on January 22, 2026. The initiative aims to leverage pledges of over $5 billion for rebuilding Gaza, a territory devastated by recent conflict, and to establish international stabilization and police forces.
While Trump touted the “unlimited potential” of the Board of Peace, its formation has been met with skepticism and caution from key international allies. Several major European nations declined to participate in the initial meeting, raising questions about the board’s effectiveness and its potential to rival existing international bodies like the United Nations. The board’s expanding mandate, initially focused on a cease-fire in Gaza, now encompasses a wider range of global conflicts, fueling concerns about its scope and authority.
Gaza Reconstruction Pledges and Board Membership
President Trump stated that members of the Board of Peace have pledged $5 billion toward rebuilding Gaza, according to reports from the Associated Press. This funding is intended to address the widespread destruction of infrastructure and provide support for the civilian population. The board similarly intends to commit personnel to international stabilization and police forces within the territory. However, details regarding the specific allocation of funds and the deployment of personnel remain limited.
The composition of the Board of Peace has also drawn scrutiny. Trump extended invitations to both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin, both of whom are subject to investigation by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes. Netanyahu has formally accepted a seat on the board, despite expressing reservations about the inclusion of officials from Turkey and Qatar on the Gaza Executive Board.
According to Al Jazeera, Trump described the board as potentially “the most consequential International Body in History.”
International Response and Concerns
The launch of the Board of Peace has been met with a mixed response from the international community. While some Middle Eastern nations are participating in the inaugural meeting, many of the U.S.’s Western allies are maintaining a cautious distance. This reluctance stems from concerns about the board’s potential to undermine the United Nations and its perceived lack of transparency.
Critics have also raised concerns about the inclusion of leaders accused of war crimes, arguing that it could legitimize their actions and hinder efforts to hold them accountable. The board’s expanding charter, moving beyond its initial focus on Gaza, has further fueled these concerns, with some analysts describing it as an “imperial agenda.”
What’s Next for the Board of Peace?
The immediate focus of the Board of Peace will be on developing strategies and securing additional funding for the reconstruction of Gaza. The board is expected to present a detailed plan outlining its approach to rebuilding infrastructure, providing humanitarian aid, and establishing a sustainable security framework. However, the board’s long-term success will depend on its ability to gain the trust and cooperation of key stakeholders, including the United Nations, regional powers, and the international community.
The board’s broader ambitions to address conflicts beyond Gaza remain largely undefined. It remains to be seen whether the Board of Peace can effectively navigate the complex geopolitical landscape and deliver on its promise of “world peace.” The coming months will be crucial in determining whether this initiative can evolve beyond its controversial beginnings and become a meaningful force for conflict resolution.
What are your thoughts on the Board of Peace? Share your comments below.